Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, et al.
Volume 73 · 73 F.T.C. 266
Cite this decision
Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, et al., 73 F.T.C. 266 (1968). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v073-0007
Report an error in this record (decision id v073-0007)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
Complaint 73 F.T.C.
IN THE MATTER OF
HAWAIIAN CASUALS, LIMITED, ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS
Docket C-1204. Complaint, Feb. 5, 1968—Decision, Feb. 5, 1968
Consent order requiring a Hawaiian manufacturer of ladies' dresses and sportswear, to cease importing, manufacturing, or selling dangerously flammable wearing apparel.
COMPLAINT
Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, a corporation, and Shirley R. Hicks and Karl H. Heyer, individually and as officers of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents have violated the provisions of said Acts and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:
PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Hawaii. Respondent Shirley R. Hicks is the president of said corporate respondent and respondent Karl H. Heyer is the vice president of the corporate respondent. They formulate, direct and control the acts, practices and policies of said corporation.
Respondents are engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of textile fiber products, including wearing apparel in the form of ladies' dresses and sportswear, with their office and principal place of business located at 1311 Kamalie Street, Honolulu, Hawaii.
PAR. 2. Respondents, now and for some time last past, have manufactured for sale, sold and offered for sale, in commerce; have imported into the United States; and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported and caused to be transported, in commerce; and have transported and caused to be transported for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale in commerce; as "commerce" is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, articles of wearing apparel, as the term "article of wearing apparel" is defined therein, which articles of wearing
HAWAIIAN CASUALS, LTD., ET AL. 267
206 Decision and Order
apparel were, under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals. Among the articles of wearing apparel mentioned hereinabove were ladies' dresses. PAR. 3. Respondents, now and for some time last past, have manufactured for sale, sold and offered for sale, articles of wearing apparel made of fabric which was, under Section 4 of the Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals, which fabric had been shipped and received in commerce, as the terms "article of wearing apparel," "fabric" and "commerce" are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; Among the articles of wearing apparel mentioned above were ladies' dresses. PAR. 4. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents herein alleged were and are in violation of the Flammable Fabrics Act and of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and as such constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
DECISION AND ORDER
The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Textiles and Furs proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission's Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have vio-
Decision and Order 73 F.T.C.
lated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in § 2.34(b) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:
1. Respondent Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Hawaii, with its office and principal place of business located at 1311 Kamaille Street, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Respondents Shirley R. Hicks and Karl H. Heyer are officers of said corporation and their address is the same as that of said corporation.
2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.
ORDER
It is ordered, That the respondents Hawaiian Casuals, Limited, a corporation, and its officers, and Shirley R. Hicks and Karl H. Heyer, individually, and as officers of said corporation, and respondents' representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. (a) Importing into the United States: or (b) Manufacturing for sale, selling, offering for sale, introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting or causing to be transported in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; or (c) Transporting or causing to be transported, for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale in commerce;
any article of wearing apparel which, under the provisions of Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, is so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals.
2. Manufacturing for sale, selling, or offering for sale any article of wearing apparel made of fabric, which fabric has been shipped or received in commerce, and which under Section 4 of the Act as amended, is so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals.
It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.
HELEN WONG, INC., ET AL. 269
Complaint
IN THE MATTER OF
HELEN WONG, INC., ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS
Docket C-1295. Complaint, Feb. 5, 1968—Decision, Feb. 5, 1968
Consent order requiring a Los Angeles, Calif., distributor of wearing apparel and fabrics to cease importing and selling dangerously flammable fabrics and furnishing false guaranties to customers.
COMPLAINT
Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Helen Wong, Inc., a corporation, and Jacob Chang, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:
PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Helen Wong, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California. Respondent Jacob Chang is the president of the said corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts, practices and policies of said corporation.
The respondents are engaged in the importation, sale and distribution of wearing apparel and fabrics, with their office and principal place of business located at 127 East 9th Street, Los Angeles, California.
PAR. 2. Respondents, now and for some time last past, have sold and offered for sale, in commerce; have imported into the United States; and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported, and caused to be transported, in commerce; and have transported and caused to be transported for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale, in commerce; as “commerce” is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, fabric, as that term is defined therein, which fabric was, under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals.