Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

National Outdoor Display, Inc.

Volume 70 · 70 F.T.C. 1369

Citation
70 F.T.C. 1369
Docket
C-1137
Complaint
1966-11-16
Decision
1966-11-16
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
electrical signs manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingfranchise business opportunity

Cite this decision

National Outdoor Display, Inc., 70 F.T.C. 1369 (1966). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v070-0085

Report an error in this record (decision id v070-0085)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-1137. Complaint, NO'I. , 1.9f6-Decision, Nov. , 1966 Consent order requiring a Memphis, Tenn., manufacturer of electrical signs to cease recruiting salesmen and distributors through misrepresentations as to earnings, sales opportunities, training, and tinancial assistance. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that National Outdoor Display, Inc., a corporation, and Hal Burns, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Kational Outdoor Display, Inc., is a corporation, organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Tennessee, with its principal offce and place of business located at 2191 Filmore Street, Memphis, Tennessee.

Respondent Hal Burns is the secretary-treasurer, and general manager of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs, and controls the acts and practices of the said corporate respondent, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His business address is the same as that of the corporate respondent. PAR. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been, engaged in the manufacturing, advertising, offering saJe, sale and distribution of electrical signs to the general publi. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business, respondents now cause and for some time last past have caused, their said Complaint 70 F. T.

product, when sold, to be shipped and transported from their place of business in the State of Tennessee to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States, and maintain and at all times hereinafter mentioned have maintained, a substantial course of trade in said products, in commerce, as "Commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business, and for the purpose of promoting the sale of said products to members of the general public, and inducing members of the public to become salesmen and distributors for the respondents, the said respondents have made 01' caused to be made numerous statements and representations in advertisements and other promotional material with respect to the said merchandise, the profits and income made by salesmen and distributors of same, training programs and financial assistance offered by respondents, and available franchises of existing, growing, and profitable businesses in various States of the United States.

Typical and illustrative, but not all inclusive of said statements and representations, are the following:

(A) FRANCHISE OPEN Existing gro\ving profitable business in this area or state distributorship available :for our product. Investment only secondary to the individual' s ability and aggressiveness to succeed in this very profitable business. We have the most wanted item on the market today. Every business firm a potential customer. Complete individual training program. Financing arrangements provided to appointed individual. Interviews now being held by appointment only. (B) 8500 PER WEEK Executive type experienced salesmen to call on business owners. $500 per week and more is now being made by our salesmen which we \vill quickly prove to you. SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS FOR A SUCCESSFUL MAN A Xational Company will discuss a distributurship branch only with a person with previous business success. Financial ability, and leadership. Company wi1 assist initial organization and sales organization. Investment of $3 750. Secured by merchandise. Possible earnings in excess of $40 000 per year.

PAR. 5. Through the use of the aforesaid statements and representations, and others similar thereto, but not specifically set NATIONAL OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC., ET AL. 1371 1369 Complaint forth herein, and the oral statements and representation of respondents' salesmen, respondents have represented, directly or by implication that:

1. Salesmen of said merchandise were earning $500 per week or more.

2. Distributors could expect to earn in excess of $40 000 a year. 3. Franchises were open and available in various areas for existing, growing, profitable businesses.

4. Without qualification every business is a potential customer. 5. A complete, individual training program would be given to salesmen and distributors.

6. Financial arrangcments would be provided to appointed distributors.

PAR. 6. In truth and in fact:

1. !\ one of respondents' salesmen had earned or were earning $500 a week.

2. No distributor has earned $40 000 a year. Many, if not a11 distributors appointed by respondents have lost money in the enterprise and such earnings would be improbable. 3. The franchise areas advertised did not represent existing, growing, profitable businesses and the business in those areas was nonexistent and would have to be developed. 4. Every business is not a potential customer because of various State laws or local ordinances which regulate such electrical signs.

5. The training program was inadequate and impersonal consisting only of the playing of a record and a short lecture to groups.

6. 0 financing arrangements were provided for distributors. Therefore, the statements and representations as set forth in Paragraphs Five and Six were and are false, misleading and decepti ve.

PAR. 7. In the course and conduct of their business, and at a11 times mentioned herein respondents have been in substantial competition in commerce with corporations, firms, and individuals engaged in the sale of articles of merchandise of the same general kind and nature as those sold by respondents. PAR. 8. The use by respondents of the aforseaid false, misleading and deceptive statements, representations and practices, has had, and now has, the capacity to misleading members of the general public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true, and into the accept- Decision and Order 70 F.

ance of sales jobs, and in the investments of substantial sums of money as distributors of respondents' products, by reason of said erroneous and mistaken beliefs.

PAR. 9. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents, as herein alleged, were and are a11 to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondents' competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. DECISION AND ORDER The Commission having heretofore determined to issue its complaint charging the respondents named in the caption hereof with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the respondents having been served with notice of said determination and with a copy of the complaint the Commission intended to issue together with a proposed form of order; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by respondents of a11 the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint to issue herein, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as set forth in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission s rules; and The Commission, having considered the agreement, hereby accepts same, issues its complaint in the form contemplated by said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent i\ ational Outdoor Display, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the Jaws of the State of Tennessee, with its principal offce and place of business located at 2191 Filmore Street, Memphis, Tennessee. Respondent Hal Burns is the secretary-treasurer and general manager of said corporation, and his address is the same as that of the said corporation.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondents )!ational Outdoor Display, Inc. a corporation, and its offcers, and Hal Burns, individual11y and as NATIO:\AL OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC., ET AL. 1373 1369 Decision and Order an offcer of said corporation, and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the selling, offering for sale or promotion of the sale of signs, displays or other merchandise, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing, directly or hy implication, that:

1. Salesmen of respondents ' pr-oducts have earned, or are earning $500 a week or any other amounts: Provided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereunder for respondents to establish that their salesmen regularly earn the represented amount. 2. Distributors of respondents' products have earned the sum of 840 000 a year, or will receive earnings or compensation in any amount: Provided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceecling instituted hereunder for respondents to establish that distributors of said products have regularly and consistently received earnings or compensation in the represented amounts in the regular course of business.

3. Franchise areas are available in growing, profitable, existing businesses: Provided, hmvever That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereunder for, respondents to establish the truth of such representations. 4. Every business is a potential customer for purchase of respondents' products.

5. Respondents provide a complete individual training program for salesmen and distributors of their products: Provided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereunder for respondents to establish that a training program of the kind and scope represented is in fact furnished all salesmen and distributors. 6. Respondents provide financing arrangements for distributors of respondents ' products: P,' ovided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereunder for respondents to establish that financing in the amount and under the terms and conditions stated is provided.

7. IvIisrepresenting in any manner, the earnings of salesmen or distributors; the nature or character, kind and status of business offered for sale; the potential market for sales; Certification of Record 70 F. the training program provided, or the available financial support.

It is j!l"ther orde?' That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 70 F.T.C. 1318 · 70 F.T.C. 1374 →