Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Wilmington Chemical Corporation

Volume 69 · 69 F.T.C. 828

Citation
69 F.T.C. 828
Docket
8648
Decision
1966-06-16
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
water repellent chemicals
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Cite this decision

Wilmington Chemical Corporation, 69 F.T.C. 828 (1966). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v069-0074

Report an error in this record (decision id v069-0074)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF WILMI;\GTON CHEMICAL CORPORATION ET AL. ORDER, OPIXIQX, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 8648. Complaint, Oct. 1964-Decision, June, 1966 Order nquiring a Chicago, Il1. , manufacturer of a water repellent product, to cease misrepresenting the origin and waterproofing qualities of jts product and making deceptive claims concerning testing, profitability, discounting of notes, and guarantee coverage. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Fedoral Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Wilmington Chemical Corporation, a corporation, and Joseph S. KJehman, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, here- ;.

Complaint 69 F, control a miIJ, factory or manufacturing plant wherein said hosiery or other textile products are manufactured. FIX AL ORDER ;\ a appeal from the initial decision of the hearing examiner having been filed, and the Commission having determined that the case should not be placed on its own docket for review and that pursuant to Section 3,21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice (effective August 1, 1963), the initial decision should be adopted and issued as the decision of the Commision: It ordered That the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 16th day of June 1966, become the decision of the Comnlission.

It is further ordered That respondents, Midwest Hosiery Incorporated, a corporation, Sidney Leibowitz, Solomon Kopman and Ann Gruber, individually and as offcers of said corporation shah, within sixty (60) days after service of this order upon them, file with the Commission a report in writing, signed by such respondents, setting forth in detail the manner and form of their compliance with the order to cease and desist.

← 69 F.T.C. 816 · 69 F.T.C. 828 →