Wilmington Chemical Corporation
Volume 69 · 69 F.T.C. 828
Cite this decision
Wilmington Chemical Corporation, 69 F.T.C. 828 (1966). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v069-0074
Report an error in this record (decision id v069-0074)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF WILMI;\GTON CHEMICAL CORPORATION ET AL. ORDER, OPIXIQX, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 8648. Complaint, Oct. 1964-Decision, June, 1966 Order nquiring a Chicago, Il1. , manufacturer of a water repellent product, to cease misrepresenting the origin and waterproofing qualities of jts product and making deceptive claims concerning testing, profitability, discounting of notes, and guarantee coverage. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Fedoral Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Wilmington Chemical Corporation, a corporation, and Joseph S. KJehman, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, here- ;.
Complaint 69 F, control a miIJ, factory or manufacturing plant wherein said hosiery or other textile products are manufactured. FIX AL ORDER ;\ a appeal from the initial decision of the hearing examiner having been filed, and the Commission having determined that the case should not be placed on its own docket for review and that pursuant to Section 3,21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice (effective August 1, 1963), the initial decision should be adopted and issued as the decision of the Commision: It ordered That the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 16th day of June 1966, become the decision of the Comnlission.
It is further ordered That respondents, Midwest Hosiery Incorporated, a corporation, Sidney Leibowitz, Solomon Kopman and Ann Gruber, individually and as offcers of said corporation shah, within sixty (60) days after service of this order upon them, file with the Commission a report in writing, signed by such respondents, setting forth in detail the manner and form of their compliance with the order to cease and desist.