Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Dan Millstein, Inc

Volume 68 · 68 F.T.C. 930

Citation
68 F.T.C. 930
Docket
C-1020
Complaint
1965-11-23
Decision
1965-11-23
Document type
consent order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
Clayton Act s2 / Robinson-Patman
Industry
wearing apparel manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Separate statement / dissent
yes
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Dan Millstein, Inc, 68 F.T.C. 930 (1965). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v068-0072

Report an error in this record (decision id v068-0072)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF DAN MILLSTEIN, INC.

CONSENT ORDER , ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 2(d) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket C-I020. Complaint, Nov. 23, 1965-Decision, Nov. , 1965* Consent order requiring a New York City wearing apparel manufacturer to cease discriminating among its competing customers in the payment of advertising and promotional allowances, in violation of Sec. 2 (d) of the Clayton Act.

For Commission s opinion and Commissioner Elman s dissenting statement OIccompanying this decision, see pp. 393, 403, 407 herein.

DAN MILLSTEIN, INC 931 930 Decision and Order COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe the respondent named in the caption hereof has violated and is now violating the provisions of subsection (d) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act (U. , Title , Section 13), and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereto is in the interest of the public, the Commission hereby issues its complaint stating its charges as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. The respondent is a corporation engaged in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the amended Clayton Act, and sells and distributes its wearing apparel products from one state to customers located in other states of the United States. The sales of respondent in commerce are substantial. PAR. 2. The respondent in the course and conduct of its business in commerce paid or contracted for the payment of something of value to or for the benefit of some of its customers as compensation or in consideration for services and facilities furnished by or through such customers in connection with their sale or offering for sale of wearing apparel products sold to them by respondent, and such payments were not made available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing with favored customers in the sale and distribution of respondent's wearing apparel products. PAR. 3. Included among, but not Jimited to, the practices alleged herein, respondent has granted substantial promotional payments or allowances for the promoting and advertising of its wearing apparel products to certain department stores and others who purchase respondent's said products for resale. These aforesaid promotional payments or allowances were not offered and made available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers of respondent who compete with said favored customers in the sale of respondent's wearing apparel products.

PAR. 4. The acts and practices alleged in Paragraphs One through Three are all i violation of subsection (d) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act. DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and subsequently having determined that complaint should issue, and the respondent having entered into an agreement containing an order to cease and desist from the practices being Decision and Order 68 F.

investigated and having been furnished a copy of a draft of complaint to issue herein charging it with violation of subsection (d) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended, and The respondent having executed the agreement containing a consent order which agreement contains an admission of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint to issue herein, and a statement that the signing of the said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated as set forth in such complaint and also contains the waivers and provisions required by the Commission s rules; and The Commission having considered the agreement, hereby accepts the same, issues its complaint in the form contemplated by said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Dan Millstein, Inc. , is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its office and principal place of business located at 205 West 39th Street, New York, New York.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent. ORDER It is ordered That respondent Dan Millstein, Inc., a corporation its officers, directors, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in the course of its business in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Clayton Act, as amended, do forthwith cease and desist from: Paying or contracting for the payment of anything of value , or for the benefit of any customer of the respondent as compensation or in consideration for advertising or promotional services, or any other service or facility, furnished by or through such customer in connection with the handling, sale or offering for sale of wearing apparel products manufactured sold or offered for sale by respondent, unless such payment or consideration is made available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing with such favored customer in the distribution or resale of such products. It is further ordered That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order. Commissioner Elman dissenting.

THE ELMO COMPANY ET AL. 933 933 Complaint

← 68 F.T.C. 927 · 68 F.T.C. 933 →