Magnaflo Company, Inc
67 F.T.C. 1353 · Docket 8422 · Decided · Opinion
Cite this decision
Magnaflo Company, Inc, 67 F.T.C. 1353 (1965). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v067-0077s7
Decision id v067-0077s7
Text (OCR of the scan; may contain errors)
MAGNAFLO COMPANY, INC., ET AL.
Docket 8422. Order, Feb. 18, 1965 Order remanding case to the hearing examiner pursuant to a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, 7 S.&D. 1112. Orver REOPENING Case AND REMANDING IT TO Hearing Examiner The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, by its judgment entered on February 4, 1965 [7 S.&D. 1112], having remanded this case for the further proceedings directed in its opinion of the same date:
It 7s ordered, That the matter be, and it hereby is, reopened.
It is further ordered, That the matter be, and it hereby is, remanded to Hearing Examiner Joseph W. Kaufman for such further proceedings, including hearings, as are necessary to comply fully with the directions contained in the opinion and judgment of the Court that respondent be given an expeditious and full opportunity to show that its trade name can be limited by the use of qualifying words so as to make unambiguous the claim that its product will conserve battery charge and prolong battery effectiveness.
It is further ordered, That the hearing examiner, upon completion of the further proceedings, shall file a supplemental initial decision based upon the record made prior to the remand and any additional evidence that may be received.