Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

American Cyanamid Co. et al.

Volume 63 · 63 F.T.C. 1747

Citation
63 F.T.C. 1747
Docket
7211
Complaint
1958-07-28
Decision
1963-12-17
Document type
modifying order
Case type
antitrust
Industry
antibiotic manufacturing
Outcome
modified
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

American Cyanamid Co. et al., 63 F.T.C. 1747 (1963). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v063-0104

Report an error in this record (decision id v063-0104)

Order status: modified (still in effect) Commission order action. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In the Matter of

AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. ET AL.

ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT

Docket 7211. Complaint, July 28, 1958—Decision, Dec. 17, 1963

Final order modifying desist order of August 8, 1963, page 1895 herein requiring six antibiotic manufacturers and distributors accounting for 100% of the industry's sale of tetracycline, to cease concerted price fixing and collusive

AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. ET AL. 1747

1692 Syllabus

similar products in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Clayton Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: (1) Knowingly inducing, or knowingly receiving or accepting, any discrimination in the price of such products by directly or indirectly inducing, receiving or accepting from any seller a net price respondents know or should know is below the net price at which said products of like grade and quality are being sold by such seller to other customers who in fact compete with respondents in the resale and distribution of such products. (2) Maintaining, operating, or utilizing respondent National Parts Warehouse or any other organization as a means or instrumentality to induce or receive discounts or rebates which result in a net price respondents know or should know is below the net price at which said products of like grade and quality are being sold by such seller to other customers who in fact compete with respondents in the resale and distribution of such products. The provisions of this paragraph (2) are not applicable to respondent National Parts Warehouse or respondent Bryant M. Smith, Sr.

For the purpose of determining the “net price” under the terms of this order, there shall be taken into account all discounts, rebates, allowances, deductions or other terms and conditions of sale by which net prices are effected.

It is further ordered, That the aforesaid respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

By the Commission, Commissioner Elman not concurring and Commissioner Higginbotham concurring.

← 63 F.T.C. 1692 · 63 F.T.C. 1747 →