Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

J. Weingarten, Inc.

Volume 63 · 63 F.T.C. 452

Citation
63 F.T.C. 452
Docket
7714
Complaint
1960-01-05
Decision
1963-08-13
Document type
dismissal
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
Fur Products Labeling Act
Industry
fur products
Outcome
dismissed
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labeling

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

J. Weingarten, Inc., 63 F.T.C. 452 (1963). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v063-0021

Report an error in this record (decision id v063-0021)

Order status: set_aside Commission order action. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

IN THE MATTER OF

J. WEINGARTEN, INC.

ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDEDAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT

Docket 7714. Complaint, Jan. 5, 1960—Decision, Aug. 13, 1963

Order dismissing "solely for the purpose of complying with the * * * order of the District Court" requiring the Commission to issue a final order disposing of the case by August 13—"without prejudice to the right of the

Syllabus 63 F.T.C.

5. Failing to set forth the term "Dyed Broadtail-processed Lamb" in the manner required where an election is made to use that term instead of the words "Dyed Lamb". 6. Failing to set forth the term "Natural" as part of the information required to be disclosed on invoices under the Fur Products Labeling Act and Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder to describe fur products which are not pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed or otherwise artificially colored. 7. Failing to set forth separately information required under Section 5(b)(1) of the Fur Products Labeling Act and Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder with respect to each section of fur products composed of two or more sections containing different animal furs.

It is further ordered, That respondents Murray Hoffman and Edward Jacobs, individually and as copartners trading as Hoffman & Jacobs or under any other trade name, and respondents' representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the introduction, sale, advertising or offering for sale, in commerce, or the processing for commerce, of fur products; or in connection with the selling, advertising, offering for sale, or processing of fur products which have been shipped and received in commerce, do forthwith cease and desist from misbranding fur products by substituting for the labels affixed to such fur products pursuant to Section 4 of the Fur Products Labeling Act labels which do not conform to the requirements of the aforesaid Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder.

It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 63 F.T.C. 446 · 63 F.T.C. 452 →