Philip Rosenthal
Volume 61 · 61 F.T.C. 1291
Cite this decision
Philip Rosenthal, 61 F.T.C. 1291 (1962). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v061-0146
Report an error in this record (decision id v061-0146)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In Tae Martrer oF PHILIP ROSENTHAL ET AL. TRADING AS PHILIP ROSENTHAL COMPANY CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FED- ERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS Docket C-271. Complaint, Nov. 29, 1962—Decision, Nov. 29, 1962 Consent order requiring New York City manufacturers to cease violating the Flammable Fabrics Act by selling in commerce scarfs which were so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn.
Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission having reason to believe that Philip Rosenthal and Sidney Rick, individually and as copartners, trading as Philip Rosenthal Company, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: Decision and Order 61 F.T.C.
Paracrapy 1. Respondents Philip Rosenthal and Sidney Rick are individuals and copartners trading as Philip Rosenthal Company and have their office and principal place of business at 140 West 36th Street, New York, N.Y.
Par. 2. Respondents, subsequent to July 1, 1954, the effective date of the Flammable Fabrics Act, have manufactured for sale, sold and offered for sale, in commerce; have imported into the United States; and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported and caused to be transported, in commerce; and have transported and caused to be transported, for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale in commerce; as “commerce” is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, articles of wearing apparel, as that term is defined therein, which articles of wearing apparel were, under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when - worn by individuals. Among the articles of wearing apparel mentioned above were scarfs.
Par. 3. Respondents, subsequent to July 1, 1954, the effective date of the Flammable Fabrics Act, have sold and offered for sale, in commerce, have imported into the United States; and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported, and caused to be transported, in commerce; and have transported and caused to be transported, after sale in commerce; as “commerce” is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, fabric, as that term is defined therein, which fabric was, under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals. Par. 4, Respondents, subsequent to July 1, 1954, the effective date of the Flammable Fabrics Act, have manufactured for sale, sold, and offered for sale, articles of wearing apparel made of fabric which was, under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals, and which fabric had been shipped or received in commerce, as the terms “article of wearing apparel”, “fabric”, and “commerce” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act.
Among the articles of wearing apparel mentioned above were scarfs. Par. 5. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents were and are in violation of the Flammable Fabrics Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and as such constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Decision AND ORDER The Commission having heretofore determined to issue its complaint charging the respondents named in the caption hereof with PHILIP ROSENTHAL CO. 1293 1291 Decision and Order violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, and the respondents having been served with notice of said determination and with a copy of the complaint the Commission intended to issue, together with a proposed form of order; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint to issue herein, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as set forth in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission, having considered the agreement, hereby accepts same, issues its complaint in the form contemplated by said agreement, makes the following jurisidictional findings, and enters the following order :
1. Respondents Philip Rosenthal and Sidney Rick are individuals and copartners trading as Philip Rosenthal Company with their office and principal place of business located at 140 West 36th Street, New York, N.Y.
2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.
ORDER It is ordered, That respondents Philip Rosenthal and Sidney Rick, individually and as copartners trading as Philip Rosenthal Company, or under any other name, and respondents’ representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. (a) Importing into the United States; or (b) Manufacturing for sale, selling, offering for sale, introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting or causing to be transported, in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; or (c) Transporting or causing to be transported, for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale in commerce; any article of wearing apparel which, under the provisions of Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, is so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals. 2. Manufacturing for sale, selling, or offering for sale any article of wearing apparel made of fabric, which fabric has been Complaint . 61 F.T.C.
shipped or received in commerce, and which under Section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, is so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals. 8. (a) Importing into the United States; or (b) Selling, offering for sale, introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting, or causing to be transported, in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; or (c) Transporting or causing to be transported, for the purpose of sale or delivery after sale in commerce; any fabric, which, under the provisions of Section 4 of the said Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, is so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals.
It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.