Consumer Law Library

Pressing Supply Company

Volume 59 · 59 F.T.C. 146

Citation
59 F.T.C. 146
Docket
8337
Complaint
1961-03-16
Decision
1961-07-25
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
household goods
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

Pressing Supply Company, 59 F.T.C. 146 (1961). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v059-0025

Report an error in this record (decision id v059-0025)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE l\IATTER OF PRESSING SUPPLY COl\IPANY ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER , ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COM~IISSION ACT Docket 8337. Complaint, Mar. 1961-Decision, July, 1961 Consent order requiring Philadelphia distributors to cease falsely representing excessive amounts as the usual retail prices for ironing board covers, by such practices as imprinting fictitious prices on containers of the products before shipment to distributors, jobbers, and retail purchasers. By a similar consent order on Jan. 3, 1962, the matter was disposed of as to the sales representative.

CmrPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission , the Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by ::aicl Act Federal Trade Commission, having reaso:n to be.lieve that Pressing; Supply Company, a corporation, and Ironfast Products Company, a corporationj and tJ el'ome Silk and Sidney Cozen, individually and nncl ~~\nnette as ofiicel's of said corporations, and Sanford A. Specht PRESSING SUPPLY CO. ET AL. 147 146 Complaint Specht, doing business as S. A. Specht Associates, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act and it appearing to the Commisson that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges jnthat respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. . Respondent Pressing Supply Company is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, with its main office and principal place of business located at 1807 E. Huntington Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

R.respondent Ironfast Products Company is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania with its main office and principal place of business located at 1807 E. I-Iuntington Avenue, Philadelphia Pennsy lvania.

Individual respondents Jerome Silk and Sidney Cozen are officers of said corporations. The.y formulate, direct and control the acts and practices of the said corporate respondents, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. Their address is the same as that of the corporate respondents.

PAR. 2. S. A. Sprecht Associates is a copartnership consisting of Sanford A. Specht and Annette Specht. S. A. Specht Associates is the sales representative of the corporate respondents. Its address is 1140 Broadway, New York, New York. PAR. 3. Respondents are now, and for some time last past, have been, engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution of ironing board covers and other merchandise to distributors jobbers and retailers for resale to the purchasing public. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business, respondents now cause, and for some time last past have caused, their said products, when sold, to be shipped from the State of Pennsylvania to purchasers thereof located in various other states of the United States and in the District of Columbia, and maintain, and at all times mentioned herein have maintained, a substantial course of trade in said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 5. Respondents, before shipping said ironing board covers imprint on the containers thereof various prices. By means of the prices appearing on said containers, respondents represent that such are the usual and regular retail prices for said ironing board covers. Such representations are false, misleading and deceptive. In truth and in fact such amounts are tictitiousancl Ded:-,;ioll GO F.

greatly in excess of the prices at which the ironing board covers are usually and regularly sold at retail. PAR. 6. By the practice aforesaid respondents place in the hands of retailers a means and instrumentality ,,'hereby such retailers may mislead and deceive members of the purchasing public as to the usual and regular retail prices of their ironing board covers. P.;\R. 7. In the conduct of their business, at all times mentioned herein, respondents have been in substantial competition, in eommetTe, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of ironing board covers of the same kind and general nature of those sold by respondents.

PAR. 8. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents had, and nmy have, the tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive members of the purchasing public as to the usual and regular retail selling price of said ironing board covers and into the purchase of substantial quantities thereof because of such erroneous and mistaken belief. As a result thereof, substantial trade in commerce has been, and is being, unfairly diverted to the respondents from their competitors and substantial injury has been and is being clone to competition in commerce.

PAR. D. The acts and practices of the respondents, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of their competitors and constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair acts and practices, in commerce, within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

..11, Fj' ede/'ick~ Jl cjl a J//(8 for the Commission. XelCll/al/. ill((8tej' by .11,' Reuben Jlille'i' Philadelphia, Pa. ~ for respondents Pressing Supply Co., Il'ollfnst Products Co. erome Silk and Sidney Cozen.

IXITL\L DECISION BY .AB~ER E. LIPSCO:\IB , I-IEARIXG EXAMINER The complaint. herein "-as issued on l\fai'ch 16 , 1961 , charging Respondents ,,'ith violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act by imprinting on the containers of their ironing board covers false, misleading and deceptive representations of the regular retail prices for said ironing board covers.

Thereafter, on April 25, IH61 , Respondents Pressing Supply Company, Ironfast Products Company, Jerome Silk (who signed as Jerome R. Silk) and Sidney Cozen, their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint herein entered into an Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist, which was approved by the Director and Assistant Director of the Commission s Bureau ,, PRESSING SUPPLY CO. ET AL" 149 146 De-c-i:;.:ion of Litigation, and (hereafter, on ~lay 18 , 1961, submitted to the lIemoing Examiner for consideration.

The agreement identifies I~respondents Pressing Supply Company and Ironfast Products Company fls Pennsylvania corporations, with their main office find principal place of business located at 1807 E. I-Iuntington Street, PhiIndelphia, Pennsylvania, and Jerome. Silk and Sidney Cozen as officers of said corporations, their address being the same as that of the corporate respondents. Attached to and made fl part of the agrpement is a document executed by cou11sel for the above-named Respondents, certifying that. " Jerome. Silk" nncl "Jerome. R. Silk' : are one and the snme person. Respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts a alleged in the complaint. and agree that the 1'("co1'(l Jl1ny be taken ns if findings of jnrisc1ichona1 facts had been duly ma(le in accordance ,,'ith such allegMions.

Respondents waive any further procedure before the. fie-firing Examiner and the Commission: the making of findings of fact and eonclnsions of law; and all of the rights they may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease nnd desist entered in accordance ",ith the fI~rreement. All parties agree that the rp(~ord on ,,-which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; that the order to cease and desist, as contained in the. agreement hen it shall hfiTe become a part of the decision of the Commission, shall have the same force and effect fls if entered after n fnn hearing, and may be filtered, modified or set nside in the manner provided for other orders: that the complaint herein may be used in construing the terms of said order: and t hat the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that. they have violated the In", alleged in the complaint..

\after consideration of the alJegfitions of the complaint and the provisions of the agreement ~:lllcl the proposed order, the Hearing Ex~;minel' is of the opinion that 811eh order constitutes a ~atisfactory disposition of this proceeding as to Respondents Pressing 811ppl)' Company, Ironfast Pro(l11cts Company, .Jerome Silk and tll(',Sidney Cozen. Accordingly, in consonance. ,,-ith the terms of aforesaid agreement, the fleal'ing Examiner acecpts the Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist entered into by the above-named Respondents; finds that the Commission hils jurisdiction over those Respondents and o,-pr their acts and practices ns :1Jlf'ged in the complaint; and finds that thjs proceeding is in the public interest. As provided jn sflid agreement, this proreed- Syllabus 59 F.

ing as to Respondents Sanford A. Specht and Annette Specht ,-\"ill beItotherwiseis ordeTeddisposedThat Respondentsof. ThereforePressing Supply Company, a corporation, and Ironfast Products Company, a corporation, and their officers, and Jerome Silk al.d Sidney Cozen, individually and as officers of said corporations, and Respondents' agents, representatives, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution of ironing board covers or other merchandise, in commerce as "commerce': is defined in the Federal trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist. from:

1. Representing, directly or by implication, in any manner, that any amount is the usual and regular retail price of merchandise when such amount is in excess of the price at which said merchandise is usually and regularly sold at retail in the trade area or areas where the representation is made; 2. Putting any plan into operation whereby retailers or others may misrepresent the usual and regular retail price of merchandise. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 25th day of July 1961, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly: It ordered That Responde.nts Pressing Supply Company and Ironfast Products Company, corporations, and Jerome Silk and Sidney Cozen, individually and as officers of said corporations, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have eompliec1 ,-,ith the. order to cease and desist.

← 59 F.T.C. 141 · 59 F.T.C. 150 →