Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Colgate-Palmolive Company

Volume 58 · 58 F.T.C. 422

Citation
58 F.T.C. 422
Docket
7660
Decision
1961-03-09
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
dentifrice manufacturing
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Colgate-Palmolive Company, 58 F.T.C. 422 (1961). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v058-0043

Report an error in this record (decision id v058-0043)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

Ix THE IA TTER COLGATE-PAL IOLIVE CmIPANY ORDER. ETC.. IX REG \RD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATIO:r- OF THE FEDERAL TRADE Cm,Il\IISSION ACT Docket 7660. Complaint, Nov. 1959-Decision, l1-Ia1. 9, 1961 Order requiring a manufacturer of a dentifrice, among other products, with headquarters in New York City, to cease representing falsely in advertisements and television commercials that its "Colgate Dental Cream with Garr101'' formed a " protective shield" around teeth, thereby affording l1sers complete protection against tooth decay or the development of en vities in their teeth.

Edward F. Downs, Esq. and Anthony J. Kennedy, Esq. S11 pporting the complaint.

Syllabus 58 F.

stone Tire and R,nbbcr Company, directly or indirectly, pays or contributes anything of value to any such marketing oil company in connection with the sale of TBA products by The Firestone Tire and R.rubber Company or any distributor of Firestone products any wholesaler or retailer of petroleum products of such marketing oil company;

2. Paying, granting or allowing, or offering to pay, grant or a11o,, anything of value to Shell Oil Company or to any other marketing oil company for acting as sales agent or for otherwise sponsoring, recommending, urging, inducing or promoting the sale of TEA products, directly or indirectly, by The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company or any distributor of Firestone products to any wholesaler or retailer of petroleum products of such marketing oil company;

;-). Reporting or part.icipating in the reporting to Shell Oil Company or to any other marketing oil company concerning sales of TBA products to wholesalers or retailers of petroleum products individually or by groups, of any such marketing oil company. I t is f1uther oTdenxl. That the initial de,cision as so modified and snpplemented be, and it hereby is, adopted as the decision of the Commission.

It i8 fUTtheT onlered. That respondents Shell Oil Company and The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, corporations, shall, within sixty (50) days after service upon them of this order, file Tfith the Commission a report, in -writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in Tfhich they have complied with the aforesaid order to cease and desist.

← 58 F.T.C. 371 · 58 F.T.C. 422 →