B. D. Ritholz
56 F.T.C. 1639 · Docket 1554 · Decided · Set aside or reopened
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
B. D. Ritholz, 56 F.T.C. 1639 (1959). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0365s14
Decision id v056-0365s14
Text (OCR of the scan; may contain errors)
B. D. RITHOLZ ET AL.
Docket 2069. Order, Sept. 30, 1959 Order denying motion to vacate desist order of Apr. 6, 1934, 18 F.T.C. 348, prohibiting false advertising in the sale of spectacles. This matter having come on to be heard upon respondents’ motion to vacate and set aside an order to cease and desist entered by the Commission in this proceeding on April 6, 1934, and upon the answer in opposition to said motion filed by counsel supporting the complaint; and The Commission having fully considered said motion and supporting affidavit and the answer in opposition thereto and having concluded that respondents have made no adequate showing that changed conditions of fact or of law justify reopening the proceeding looking towards modification or the setting aside of the aforesaid order to cease and desist, or that the public interest so requires: Accordingly, it is ordered, That the motion, filed on behalf of respondents on September 3, 1959, seeking to vacate the order to cease and desist heretofore entered against respondents be, and the same hereby is, denied.