Consumer Law Library

Field Music Sales, Inc.

Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 1567

Citation
56 F.T.C. 1567
Docket
7831
Complaint
1960-03-18
Decision
1960-06-28
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
phonograph record distribution
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Respondent counsel
nr, Raymond HM. Levy, of San Francisco, Calif
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingendorsements

Cite this decision

Field Music Sales, Inc., 56 F.T.C. 1567 (1960). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0362

Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0362)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 1 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In tur MatTrer or FIELD MUSIC SALES, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7831. Complaint, Lar, 18, 1960—Decision, June 28, 1960 Consent order requiring San Francisco, Calif., distributors for several record mutnusactirers to retail outlets and jukebox operators, to cease paying concenled “payola’ to television and radio dise jockeys to have their records broeadeast day after day in order to increase sales. Mr. John T. Walker and Afr, James H. Kelley tor the Commission. nr, Raymond HM. Levy, of San Francisco, Calif., for respondents. Envian Deciston py J. Earn Cox, Hrartne Examiner Lhe complaint charges respondents, who are engaged in the offering for sale, sale and distribution of phonograph records as independent distributors for several record manufacturers to retail outlets and jukebox operators in various states of the United States, with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, in that respondents, alone or with certain unnamed record manufacturers, have negotiated for and disbursed “payola,” ie., the payment of money or other valuable consideration to disk jockeys of musical programs on radio and television stations, to induce, stimulate or motivate the disk jockeys to select, broadcast, “expose” and promote certain records, 1 which respondents are financially interested, on the express or imphed understanding that the disk jockeys will conceal, withhold or camouflage the fact of such payment from the listening public.

After the issuance of the complaint, respondents, their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement containing consent order to cease and desist, which was approved by the Director, the Associate Director and the Assistant Director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter transmitted to the hearing examiner for consideration. The agreement states that respondent Field Music Sales, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under the laws of the State of California, with its principal office and place Order 56 F.T.C.

of business located at 1480 Howard Street, San -Francisco, California, and that respondent Richard Field is President of said corporate respondent and formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, his address being the same as that of the corporate respondent. The agreement provides, among other things, that. respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint, and agree that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; that the agreement shall not become a part. of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order agreed upon, which may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the order set forth in the agreement and hereinafter included in this decision shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing. Respondents may waive any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all of the rights they may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement. The order agreed upon fully disposes of all the issues raised in the complaint, and adequately prohibits the acts and_ practices charged therein, as being in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Accordingly, the hearing examiner finds this proceeding to be in the public interest, and accepts the agreement containing consent order to cease and desist as part of the record upon which this decision is based. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondent Field Music Sales, Inc., a corporation, and its officers, and respondent Richard Field, individuaily and as an officer of said corporation, and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with phonograph records which have been distributed in commerce, or which are used by radio or television stations in broadcasting programs in commerce, xs “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

(1) Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money or other material consideration, to any THE ROBERTS CO. ET AL. 1569 1567 Syllabus person, directly or indirectly, to induce that person to select, or participate in the selection of, and the broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or either of them, have a financial interest of any nature;

(2) Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money, or other material consideration, to any person, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to influence any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person, in any manner, to select, or participate in the selection of, and the broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or either of them, have a financial interest of any nature. There shall be “public disclosure” within the meaning of this order, by any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person, who selects or participates in the selection and broadcasting of a record when he shal! disclose, or cause to have disclosed, to the listening public at the time the record is played, that his selection and broadcasting of such record are in consideration for compensation of some nature, directly or indirectly received by him or his employer. ‘ DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 28th day of June, 1960, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :

It is ordered, That respondents Field Music Sales, Inc., a corporation, and Richard Field, individually and as an officer of said corporation, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

← 56 F.T.C. 1567 · 56 F.T.C. 1569 →