Ideal Record Products, Inc.
Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 1552
deceptive advertisingendorsements
Cite this decision
Ideal Record Products, Inc., 56 F.T.C. 1552 (1960). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0356
Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0356)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
the order to cease and desist.
In the MatTTerR oF IDEAL RECORD PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7768. Complaint, Jun. 27, 1960—Decision, June 23, 1960 Consent order requiring New York City distributors for several record manufacturers to retail outlets and jukebox operators, to cease paying concealed “nayola” to television and radio disc jockeys to have their records broadcast day after day in order to increase sales. Mr. John 7. Walker and Mr. James H. Kelley tov the Commission. Newman, Hauser & Teitler, by Mr. Samuel L. Teitler, of New York, N.Y., for respondents.
InittaL Decision py J. Hart Cox, Hearing Examiner The complaint charges respondents, who are engaged in the offering for sale, sale and distribution of phonograph records as independent distributors for several record manufacturers to retail out- Jets and jukebox operators in various states of the United States, with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, in that respondents, alone or with certain unnamed record manufacturers, have negotiated for and disbursed “payola,” ie., the payment of money or other valuable consideration to disk jockeys of musical programs on radio and television stations, to induce, stimulate or motivate the disk jockeys to select, broadcast, “expose” and promote certain records, in which respondents are financially interested, on the express or implied understanding that the disk jockeys will conceal, withhold or camouflage the fact of such payment from the listening public.
After the issuance of the complaint, respondents, their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement containing consent order to cease and desist, which was approved IDEAL RECORD PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. 1553 1552 Decision by the Director, Associate Director and Assistant Director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter transmitted to the hearing examiner for consideration.
The agreement states that respondent Ideal Record Products, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its principal office and place of business located at 549 West 52nd Street, New York, New York; that respondent Ideal Record Products of New Jersey, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New Jersey, with its principal office and place of business located at 357 Lyons Avenue, Newark, New Jersey; and that individual respondents Alfred Levine and Samuel Keenholtz are, respectively, president and treasurer, and vice president and secretary of each of the corporate respondents, and formulate, direct and control the acts and practices of said corporate respondents, the address of the individual respondents being 549 West 52nd Street, New York, New York.
The agreement provides, among other things, that respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint, and agree that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order agreed upon, which may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the order set forth in the agreement and hereinafter included in this decision shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing. Respondents waive any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all of the rights they may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement. The order agreed upon fully disposes of all the issues raised in the complaint, and adequately prohibits the acts and practices charged therein as being in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Accordingly, the hearing examiner finds this proceed- Decision 56 F.T.C.
ing to be in the public interest, and accepts the agreement containing consent order-to cease and desist as part of the record upon which this decision is based. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondents Ideal Record Products, Inc., a corporation, and Ideal Record Products of New Jersey, Inc., a corporation, and their officers, and respondents Alfred Levine and Samuel Keenholtz, individually and as officers of said corporations, and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with phonograph records which have been distributed in commerce, or which are used by radio or television stations in broadcasting programs in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money, or other material consideration, to any person, directly or indirectly, to induce that person to select, or participate in the selection of, and broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or any of them, have a financial interest of any nature;
2. Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money, or other material consideration, to any person, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to influence any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person in any manner, to select, or participate m the selection of, and the broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or any of them, have a financial interest of any nature. There shall be “public disclosure” within the meaning of this order by any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person, who selects or participates in the selection and broadcasting of a record, when he shall disclose, or cause to have disclosed, to the listening public at the time the record is played, shat his selection and broadcasting of such record are in consideration for compensation of some nature, directly or indirectly received by him or his employer.
DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner did, on the 23rd day of June, 1960, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :
It is ordered, That the above-named respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner W.S.F., INC., ET AL. 1555 1552 Decision and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.