Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

A-1 Record Distributors, Inc.

Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 1470

Citation
56 F.T.C. 1470
Docket
7752
Complaint
1960-01-19
Decision
1960-05-26
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
phonograph record distribution
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
John T. Walker and Mr. James H. Kelley
Respondent counsel
Mr, Dudley ¥oedicke, of New Orleans, La
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingendorsements

Cite this decision

A-1 Record Distributors, Inc., 56 F.T.C. 1470 (1960). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0328

Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0328)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In the Martrer or A-1 RECORD DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7752. Complaint, Jan. 19, 1960—Decision, Jlay 26, 1960 Consent order requiring New Orleans, La., distributors of phonograph records to cease giving concealed “payola’’ to television and radio disc jockeys to induce playing their records in order to increase sales. Mr. John T. Walker and Mr. James H. Kelley for the Commission. Mr, Dudley ¥oedicke, of New Orleans, La., for respondents. Iniriau Decision py J. Eart Cox, Hearing Examiner The complaint charges respondents, who are engaged in the offering for sale, sale and distribution of phonograph records to independent distributors for resale to retail outlets and jukebox operators In various states of the United States, with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, in that respondents, alone or with certain unnamed record manufacturers, have negotiated for and disbursed “payola,” i.e., the payment of money or other valuable consideration to disk jockeys of musical programs on radio and television stations, to induce, stimulate or motivate the disk jockeys to select, broadcast, “expose” and promote certain records, in which respondents are financially interested, on the express or implied understanding that the disk jockeys will conceal, withhold or camouflage the fact of such payment from the listening public. After the issuance of the complaint, respondents, their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement containing consent order to cease and desist, which was approved by the Director, the Associate Director, and the Assistant Director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter transmitted to the hearing examiner for consideration. The agreement states that respondent A-1 Record Distributors, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Louisiana, with its prin- A-1 RECORD DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL. 147] 1470 Order cipal office and place of business located at 628 Baronne Street, New Orleans, Louisiana; that individual respondents Joseph J. Banashak and Bobbie G. Banashak are president and secretary treasurer, respectively, of the corporate respondent; and that said individual respondents formulate, direct and control the acts and practices of said corporate respondent, their address being the same as that of the corporate respondent.

The agreement provides, among other things, that respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint, and agree that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order agreed upon, which may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the order set forth in the agreement and hereinafter included in this decision shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing. Respondents waive any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of Jaw, and all of the rights they may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement.

The order agreed upon fully disposes of all the issues raised in the complaint, and adequately prohibits the acts and practices charged therein as being in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Accordingly, the hearing examiner finds this proceeding to be in the public interest, and accepts the agreement containing consent order to cease and desist as part of the record upon which this decision is based. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondent A-1 Record Distributors, Inc., a corporation, and its officers, and respondents Joseph J. Banashak and Bobbie G. Banashak, individually and as officers of said corporation, and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with phonograph records which have been distributed in commerce, or which are used by radio or television stations in broadcasting programs in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: Syllabus 56 FTC.

(1) Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money or other material consideration, to any person, directly or indirectly, to induce that person to select, or participate in the selection of, and the broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or any of them, have a financial interest of any nature;

(2) Giving or offering to give, without requiring public disclosure, any sum of money, or other material consideration, to any person, directly or indirectly, as an inducement to influence any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person, in any manner, to select, or participate in the selection of, and the broadcasting of, any such records in which respondents, or any of them, have a financial interest of any nature. There shall be “public disclosure” within the meaning of this order, by any employee of a radio or television broadcasting station, or any other person, who selects or participates in the selection and broadcasting of a record when he shall disclose, or cause to have disclosed, to the listening public at the time the record is played, that his selection and broadcasting of such record are in consideration for compensation of some nature, directly or indirectly received by him or his employer.

DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 26th day of May, 1960, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly : It is ordered, That the above-named respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

← 56 F.T.C. 1467 · 56 F.T.C. 1472 →