Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Toycraft Associates, Inc., et al.

Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 1176

Citation
56 F.T.C. 1176
Docket
7658
Complaint
1959-11-16
Decision
1960-04-01
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
Toy manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

Toycraft Associates, Inc., et al., 56 F.T.C. 1176 (1960). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0243

Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0243)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

TOYCRAFT ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ELC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7658. Complaint, Nov. 16, 1959—Decision Apr. 1, 1960 Consent order requiring manufacturers in Brooklyn, N.Y., to cease selling their stuffed toy animals with tickets attached, or supplied for use therewith, printed with fictitious and greatly exaggerated prices, thus represented falsely as the usual retail selling prices. Mr. Ames W. Williams counsel supporting the complaint. Respondents, p7o se.

TOYCRAFT ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 1177 1176 Decision TnitraL Deciston py Epwarpd Cree. Heartnc Examiner The Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint against the above-named respondents on November 16, 1959 charging them with having violated the Federa] Trade Commission Act. The complaint alleged that respondents had misrepresented the usual or customary prices of their toys.

On February 1, 1960 there was submitted to the undersigned hearing examiner an agreement between respondents and counsel supporting the complaint providing for the entry of a consent order. Under the foregoing agreement, the respondents admit the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint. The parties agree, among other things, that the cease and desist order there set forth may be entered without further notice and have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing and the document includes a waiver by the respondents of all rights to challenge or contest the validity of the order issuing in accordance therewith. The agreement further recites that it 1s for settlement purposes only and does not. constitute an admission by the respondents that they have violated the Jaw as alleged in the complaint. The hearing examiner finds that the content of the agreement meets all of the requirements of Section 8.25(b) of the Ruies of the Commission.

The hearing examiner having considered the agreement and proposed order, and being of the opinion that they provide an appropriate basis for settlement and disposition of this proceeding, the agreement 1S hereby accepted, and it is ordered that said agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission. The following jurisdictional findings are made and the following order issued. 1. Respondent Toyeratt. Associates, Inc. 1S a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 10 John Street, Brooklyn, New York.

2. Respondent Harold Miller is an officer of the corporate respondent. and together with Phil Miller, an individual, formulate, direct and control the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including the acts and practices hereinafter set. forth. Their business address is the same as the corporate respondent. 8 The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

Syllabus 56 FTC.

ORDER It is ordered, That the respondents Toycraft Associates, Inc., a corporation, its officers and Harold Miller, individually and as an officer of the corporation, and Phil Miller, an individual, and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in the connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of stuffed toy animals or any other products in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from directly or indirectly :

1. Representing, by preticketing or in any other manner, that any amount is the usual and regular retail price of merchandise when such amount is in excess of the price at which said merchandise is usually and regularly sold at retail in the trade area or areas where the representations are made.

9. Furnishing any means or instrumentality to others by and through which they may mislead the public as to the usual and customary prices of respondents’ merchandise. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall on the Ist day of April, 1960, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :

lt is ordered, That respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

← 56 F.T.C. 1174 · 56 F.T.C. 1178 →