Martin Stuart Woolen Company
Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 310
product labelingdeceptive advertising
Cite this decision
Martin Stuart Woolen Company, 56 F.T.C. 310 (1959). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0072
Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0072)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
- 56 F.T.C. 4 — CHARLES F. GOMEZ TRADING AS WESTERN COACHING BUREAU ET AL cited_neutral
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THe MatTrer or MARTIN STUART WOOLEN COMPANY ET AL.
‘CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE WOOL PRODUCTS LABELING ACTS Docket 7479. Complaint, Apr. 80, 1959—Decision, Sept. 17, 1959 ‘Consent order requiring New York City manufacturers to cease violating the Wool Products Labeling Act by labeling and identifying on invoices and shipping memoranda as “100% Cashmere,” fabrics which contained a substantial quantity of fibers other than cashmere, and by failing to label wool products as required.
Mr. Frederich McManus supporting the complaint. Mr, Sidney Silverstein of Higgins & Silverstein, of Woonsocket, R.1., for respondents.
Titra, Decision py Joun B. Pornpexrer, Hearinc Examiner On April 80, 1959, the Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint charging that Martin Stuart Woolen Company, a corporation, and Abraham Baker, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, had violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Wool Products Decision 56 F.T.C.
4. The U.S. Bureau of Standards made tests of granite taken from a quarry named Quarry 115 or that respondent is the owner of the quarry from which the granite tested under Serial No. 115, as shown in Research Paper RP1820, was taken, or that respondent is the exclusive user of said granite.
5. The granite used by the respondent is from the same quarry as the sample tested by the U.S. Bureau of Standards as Serial No. 115 in its Research Paper RP1820.
DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall on the 17th day of September, 1959, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :
It is ordered, That the respondent. herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report. in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist.