Consumer Law Library

Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.

Volume 56 · 56 F.T.C. 168

Citation
56 F.T.C. 168
Docket
7445
Complaint
1959-03-17
Decision
1959-08-26
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
rug manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Alwin D, Edelson
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Cite this decision

Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 56 F.T.C. 168 (1959). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v056-0041

Report an error in this record (decision id v056-0041)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In THE MatTrer oF FIELDCREST MILLS, INC., TRADING AS KARASTAN RUG MILLS, INC.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7445. Complaint, Mar. 17, 1959—Decision, Aug. 26, 1959 Consent order requiring a manufacturer in Spray, N.C., to cease attaching to its rugs, labels giving an “approx” size which was larger than was the fact, thus enabling retailers to mislead the public. Mr. Alwin D, Edelson for the Commission.

Lovejoy, Morris, Wasson & Huppuch, of New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Initrau Decision By ABNER E. Lirscomp, Hearinec EXAMINER The complaint herein was issued on March 17, 1959, charging respondent with the use on labels of false, misleading and deceptive statements as to the sizes of its rugs, and with placing in the hands of retailers means and instrumentalities by and through which they may mislead the public with respect thereto, in violation of the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Thereafter, on June 17, 1959, respondent, its counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint herein entered into an Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist, which was approved by the Director and an Assistant Director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter submitted to the hearing examiner for consideration.

The agreement identifies respondent Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., as a Delaware corporation, with its office and principal place of business located in Spray, North Carolina, and Karastan Rug Mills, Inc., as an unincorporated subdivision of the corporate respondent, with office and principal place of business at 295 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York.

Respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint and agrees that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations.

Respondent waives any further procedure before the hearing examiner and the Commission; the making of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and all of the rights it may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in FIELDCREST MILLS, INC., ETC. 169 168 Decision accordance with the agreement. All parties agree that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; that the order to cease and desist, as contained in the agreement, when it shall have become a part of the decision of the Commission, shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing, and may be altered, modified or set. aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the complaint herein may be used in construing the terms of said order; and that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the Respondent that it has violated the law as alleged in the complaint.

After consideration of the allegations of the complaint and the provisions of the agreement and the proposed order, the hearing examiner is of the opinion that such order constitutes a satisfactory disposition of this proceeding. Accordingly, in consonance with the terms of the aforesaid agreement, the hearing examiner accepts the Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist; finds that the Commission has jurisdiction over the respondent and over its acts and practices as alleged in the complaint; and finds that this proceeding is in the public interest. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondent Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., a corporation, trading as Karastan Rug Mills, Inc., or under any other name, and respondent’s agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device in connection with the manufacture, offering for sale, sale or distribution of rugs or other merchandise, in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: Representing, directly or by implication, the size of their said rugs or other merchandise to be of larger dimensions than is the fact. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 26th day of August, 1959, become the decision of the Commission; and accordingly :

It is ordered, That respondent Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., a corporation, trading as Karastan Rug Mills, Inc., shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist. Decision 6 F.T.C.

← 56 F.T.C. 165 · 56 F.T.C. 170 →