Consumer Law Library

United States Asphalt Corporation

Volume 55 · 55 F.T.C. 587

Citation
55 F.T.C. 587
Docket
7181
Complaint
1958-07-11
Decision
1958-10-16
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
roofing materials distribution
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Hearing examiner
ROBERT L. PIPER (Hearing Examiner)
Commission counsel
Ga1'land S. Ferguson Esq
Respondent counsel
BTeed, Abbot MoTgan of New York, N
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

United States Asphalt Corporation, 55 F.T.C. 587 (1958). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v055-0107

Report an error in this record (decision id v055-0107)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF UNITED STATES ASPHALT CORPORATION ET AL. CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7181. Complaint, July 1958-Decision, Oct. , 1958 Consent order requiring distributors in New York City to cease misrepresenting the availability and price of their "Neva-Leak Asbestos Roof Coating by advertising letters advising prospects falsely of "substantial discounts offered on purported overages from shipments to other purchasers in a particular locality.

Ga1'land S. Ferguson Esq., for the Commission. BTeed, Abbot Morgan of New York, N. , for respondents. INITIAL DECISION BY ROBERT L. PIPER, HEARING EXAMINER The Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint against the above-named respondents on July 11 , 1958, charging them with having violated the Federal Trade Commission Act by misrepresenting the availability and regular prices of their product. Respondents appeared by counsel and entered into an agreement dated August 25 , 1958, containing a consent order to cease and desist, disposing of all the issues in this proceeding without hearing, which agreement has been duly approved by the Director of the Bureau of Litigation. Said agreement has been submitted to the undersigned, heretofore duly designated to act as hearing examiner herein, for his consideration in accordance with 93. of the Rules of Practice of the Commission. Respondents pursuant to the aforesaid agreement, have admitted all of the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint and agreed that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been made duly in accordance with such allegations. Said agreement further provides that respondents waive all further procedural steps before the hearing examiner or the Commission including the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law and the right to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with such agreement. It has also been agreed that the record herein shall consist solely of the complaint and said agreement, that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission, that said agreement is Order 55 F.

for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint, that said order to cease and desist shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing and may be altered, modified, or set aside in the manner provided for other orders, and that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order. .

This proceeding having now come on for final consideration on the complaint and the aforesaid agreement containing the consent order, and it appearing that the order and agreement cover all of the allegations of the complaint and provide for appropriate disposition of this proceeding, the agreement is hereby accepted and ordered filed upon this decision and said agreement becoming part of the Commission s decision pursuant to ~S3.21 and 3. of the Rules of Practice, and the hearing examiner accordingly makes the following findings, for jurisdictional purposes, and order:

1. Respondent, United States Asphalt Corporation, is a corporation, organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the la\vs of the State of New York. Its office is located at 576 Fifth Avenue New York, N.Y. Individual respondents Stanley Legum and Alvin Legum are officers of said corporation. They formulate, direct and control the policies and practices of the corporate respondent. The address of Alvin Legum is the same as that of the corporate respondent. The address of Stanley Legum is 418 Timothy Avenue, Norfolk, Va. 2. The Federal Trade Comnlission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents hereinabove named. The complaint states a cause of action against said respondents under the Federal Trade Commission Act, and this proceeding is in the interest of the public. ORDER It is ordered That respondents United States Asphalt Corporation, a corporation, and its officers, and Stanley Legum and Alvin Legum, individually and as officers of said corporate respondent, and respondents' agents, representatives, and employees directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of roofing n1aterial or any other products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined UNITED STATES ASPHALT CORPORATION ET AL. 589 587 Decisio.n by the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing directly or by implication: 1. That a certain sale of their product has been made to a purchaser in a specific locality, unless such is the fact; 2. That respondents have an overage or surplusage of their product in a certain area as a result of a certain sale, unless such is the fact;

3. That any amount is respondents' regular price for a product when such amount is in excess of the price at which respondents sell such product in their normal and usual course of business; 4. That any amount is a reduced price for a product unless it is less than the price at which respondents sell their product in their normal and usual course of business. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 16th day of October 1958 become the decision of the Commission; and accordingly:

It is ordered That the above-named respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

Decision 55 F.

← 55 F.T.C. 583 · 55 F.T.C. 590 →