The Warson Products Corp.
Volume 54 · 54 F.T.C. 949
deceptive advertisinghealth claims
Cite this decision
The Warson Products Corp., 54 F.T.C. 949 (1958). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v054-0135
Report an error in this record (decision id v054-0135)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
- 54 F.T.C. 1956 unresolved_page_range
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THE MATTER OF THE WARSON PRODUCTS CORP. ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6711. Complaint, Jan. 18, 1957—Decision, Jan. 22, 1958 Consent order requiring sellers in St. Louis, Mo., to cease representing falsely in newspaper and radio advertising that their “Warsene Capsules,” the only active ingredient of which was salicylamide, were an effective treatment for arthritis, rheumatism, and similar ailments, contained several active ingredients, were ‘“‘made like a doctor’s prescription,” were new and different from other products, and were a buffered formula and would not cause stomach upset, etc.
The corporate respondent agreed to the same consent settlement on August 22, 1957, p. 200 herein.
Mr. Harold A. Kennedy for the Commission.
Mr. Donald FE. Fahey, of St. Louis, Mo., pro se and for Respondent John J. Powers; Mr. George R. Williams, of St. Louis, Mo., pro se.
Ixrrman, Decision as TO LNpIvViDUAL Respondents By ABNER E. Lirscomp, Hearrne EXAMINER The complaint herein was issued on January 18, 1957, charging Respondents with violation of the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act by the dissemination of false and misleading advertisements with respect to a drug preparation designated “Warsene Capsules,” which respondents sell and distribute in commerce. On July 22, 1957, Respondents John J. Powers, George R. Williams, and Donald E. Fahey, their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement containing consent order to cease and desist, which was approved by the director and the assistant director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter submitted to the hearing examiner for consideration. Respondents John J. Powers, George R. Williams, and Donald E. Fahey are identified in the agreement as individuals and former officers of Respondent The Warson Products Corp. The agreement states that Respondent John J. Powers maintains his office at 5900 North Broadway, St. Louis, Mo., and served as president of said corporate Respondent. until July 1956; that Respondent George R. Williams maintains his office at 5935 Jameison Avenue, St. Louis, Mo., and served as vice president of said corporate respondent until August Decision 54 F.T.C.
1956; and that Respondent Donald E. Fahey maintains his office at 814 North Broadway, St. Louis, Mo.; is now a director of the said corporate respondent; and served as secretary-treasurer thereof until August 1956.
The present agreement specifies that the order contained therein does not prohibit the representations alleged in subparagraphs 5 and 6 of paragraph 6 of the complaint, regarding respondents’ product being a buffered formula and that it is a result of research, for the reason that counsel supporting the complaint is of the opinion, on the basis of the evidence now available, that such allegations cannot be sustained.
Individual Respondents John J. Powers, George R. Williams, and Donald E. Fahey admit all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint; agree that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; and waive any further procedure before the hearing examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all the rights they may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement.
All parties signatory thereto agree that as to that part of this proceeding which is disposed of by this agreement, the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shal] be based shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; that the order to cease and desist as contained in the agreement shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing, and may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders: that the complaint herein may be used in construing the terms of said order; ‘and that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint.
After consideration of the allegations of the complaint and the provisions of the agreement and the proposed order, the hearing examiner is of the opinion that such order constitutes a satisfactory disposition of this proceeding with respect to the individual Respondents John J. Powers, George R. Williams, and Donald E. Fahey. Accordingly, in consonance with the terms of the aforesaid agreement, the hearing examiner accepts the agreement containing consent order to cease and desist; finds that the Commission has jurisdiction over the respondents signatory thereto, and over their acts and practices as alleged in the complaint; and finds that this proceeding is in the public interest. Therefore, THE WARSON PRODUCTS CORP. ET AL. 951 949 ; Decision It is ordered, That Respondents John J. Powers, George R. Willams and Donald E. Fahey, individually and as former officers of The Warson Products Corp., their representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of the preparation “Warsene Capsules,” or any preparation of substantially similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties, whether sold under the same name or under any other name, do forthwith ceuse and desist from, directly or indirectly : 1. Disseminating er causing to be disseminated, by means of the United States mails or by any means in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, any advertisement which represents, directly or by implication, that said preparation: (a) Is an adequate, effective, or reliable treatment. for the aches, pains, or discormforts of any kind of arthritis, rheumatism, neuralgia, neuritis, bursitis, sciatica, lumbago, muscle soreness, or allied disorders; will afford immediate, complete, or permanent relief from the aches, pains, or discomforts thereof, or have any therapeutic effect on the symptoms or manifestations of any such conditions or disorders in excess of affording temporary relief of minor aches or pains thereof; (b) Contains any analgesic ingredient other than salicylamide; (c) Is made like a doctor’s prescription, provided, however, this shal] not prohibit the making of truthful representations concerning the use of such product. by physicians;
(d) Is a new or substantially different, kind of preparation or substantially different, in its mode of action or analgesic effect. from other commonly used analgesics;
(e) Will not cause stomach upset ;
2. Disseminating or causing to be disseminated any advertisements by any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which will likely induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of such preparation which contain any of the representations prohibited in paragraph 1 of this order.
DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to section 3.21 of the Commission’s rules of practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 22d day of January 1958, become the decision of the Commissinn: ond accordingly :
Decision 54 FTC.
It is ordered, That respondents John J. Powers, George R. Williams, and Donald E. Fahey, individually and as former officers of respondent The Warson Products Corp., a corporation, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist. AMERICAN BUSINESS EXCHANGE, INC., ET AL. 953 Decision