Amity Mills, Incorporated
Volume 53 · 53 F.T.C. 74
Cite this decision
Amity Mills, Incorporated, 53 F.T.C. 74 (1956). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v053-0012
Report an error in this record (decision id v053-0012)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THe Matter oF AMITY MILLS, INCORPORATED ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6510. Complaint, Feb. 17, 1956—Decision, July 21, 1956 Consent order requiring a distributor in New York City of cotton and other fabrics, to cease using the word “Mills” in its corporate name and to cease representing falsely in advertising that certain fabrics it imported from Italy were manufactured exclusively for it. Mr. Charles S. Cox for the Commission.
Scribner & Miller, of New York City, for respondent. Inzrtau Decision By J. Eart Cox, Heartnc EXAMINER The complaint charges that respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act by the deceptive use of the word “Mills” in its corporate name, and by misrepresenting in its advertising that certain fabrics imported and offered for sale by it were manufactured for it and that it was the exclusive distributor thereof. Respondent filed an answer to the complaint, denying generally the charges contained therein. ‘hereafter, on April 25, 1956, respondent and its counsel and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist, which was approved by the Director and Assistant Director, Bureau of Litigation of the Commission, and subsequently transmitted to the Hearing Examiner for consideration.
The agreement identifies respondent Amity Mills, Incorporated as a corporation existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its office and principal place of business located at 12 West 32nd Street, New York, New York.
The agreement provides, among other things, that respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint and agrees that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; that respondent’s answer to the complaint herein shall be considered as having been withdrawn, and the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part AMITY MILLS, INCORPORATED 75 74 Decision of the decision of the Commission; that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order agreed upon, which may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that it has violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the order set forth in the agreement and hereinafter included in this decision shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing. Respondent waives any further procedural steps before the Hearing Examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all of the rights it may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with this agreement.
The order agreed upon fully disposes of all the issues raised in the complaint, and adequately prohibits the acts and practices charged therein as being in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Accordingly, the Hearing Examiner finds this proceeding to be in the public interest and accepts the Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist as part of the record upon which this decision is based. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondent, Amity Mills, Incorporated, a corporation, and its officers, representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of cotton and other fabrics in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from directly or indirectly :
1. Using the word “Mills” or any other word of similar import or meaning in or as a part of respondent’s trade or corporate name, or representing in any other manner that respondent is the manufacturer of the fabrics sold by it unless and until respondent actually owns and operates, or directly and absolutely controls the manufacturing plant wherein said fabrics are woven or made; 2. Using the words “Manufactured for” or “Distributor” separately or in combination one with the other, or any other word or words so as to represent in any manner that it is the exclusive or sole distributor of any fabric sold by it, unless and until such is a fact. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 21st day of July, 1956, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly:
Decision 53 BVT.C.
It is ordered, That respondent Amity Mills, Inc., a corporation, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist.
DURLACHER AND COMPANY, INC., ET AL. 77 Decision