Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Leon Wolff

Volume 52 · 52 F.T.C. 946

Citation
52 F.T.C. 946
Docket
6431
Complaint
1955-10-19
Decision
1956-03-08
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
mail order business instruction
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Hearing examiner
WILLIAM L. PACK (Hearing Examiner)
Commission counsel
George E. Steinmetz
Respondent counsel
Ralph B. Herzog, of Beverly Hills, Calif
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingmail order direct sales

Cite this decision

Leon Wolff, 52 F.T.C. 946 (1956). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v052-0123

Report an error in this record (decision id v052-0123)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF LEON WOLFF TRADING AS L. W. MAIL ORDER SURVEY, ETC.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6431. Complaint, Oct. 1955-Decisi, , Mar. , 1956 Consent order requiring an individual in Los Angeles, Calif., selling a Survey or Guide having to do with the establishment and operation of a mail order business, to cease advertising falsely in newspapers, periodicals, etc., that anyone could start a successful mail order business by purchase and use of his Survey, and for only a few dollars; that the successful operators of mail order businesses named had purchased the Survey, and that the large incomes cited were typical and had been achieved by hundreds of small operators who had purchased it; that the Survey revealed confidential facts which had made fortunes for purchasers; that he was its author and one of the foremost experts in the United States on mail order business problems; and that installment purchasers could obtain a refund of all amounts paid if not satisfied.

Before lJir. WilUan~ L. Pack hearing examiner. Mr. George E. Steinmetz for the Commission. Mr. Ralph B. Herzog, of Beverly Hills, Calif., for respondent. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Leon ,Y olff, an individual trading as L. 'lV. :Mail Order Survey and as L. "V. Publishers, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest. hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Leon ,Volff is an individual trading as L. ""V. J\1:ail Order Survey and as L. ,V. Publishers. Respondent is now, and for more than one year last past has been, engaged in the promotion, sale and distribution of a Survey or Guide having to do with the establishment and operation of a mail order business and known as the " L. ,V. Survey." Respondent's office and princi pal place of business is located at 805 Larrabee Street, Los Angeles, California. Said Survey or Guide is sold directly to purchasers in various States of the United States by the respondent. W. MAIL ORDER SURVEY, ETC. 947 946 Complaint PAR. 2. In the course and conduct of his business, respondent now causes and has caused said Surveyor Guide, when sold, to be transported from his place of business in the State of California to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States. Respondent maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a substantial course of trade in commerce selling said Surveyor Guide.

PAR. 3. Respondent at all times mentioned herein has been in substantial competition, in commerce, with other persons and with c.orporations, firms and partnerships engaged in the sale of courses of instruction, books and literature relating to the mail order business.

PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of his business and for the purpose of inducing the sale of his said Surveyor Guide, respondent has made numerous statements in advertisements inserted in newspapers and periodicals and in other advertising literature, with respect to said Survey or Guide; the mail order business, the results that may be expected to follow the purchase of said Survey or Guide, and the establishment of a mail order business by following the said Surveyor Guide.

PAR. 5. By and through statements made in said advertisements respondent represented, directly and by implication: 1. That anyone can start a successful mail order business by purchasing and following respondent's Survey or Guide; 2. That only a few dollars are required to conduct a successful mail order business by those purc.hasing and following respondent' Surveyor 3. That the successful operators of mail order businesses named Guide:in the advertisements are persons who have purchased respondent' Surveyor Guide;

4. That the examples of large incomes cited in the advertisements are typical and have been aehieved by hundreds of small operators who have purchased respondent's Surveyor Guide; 5. That the Survey or Guide offered for sale by respondent reveals confidential facts which have made fortunes for persons who have purchased it;

,'T 6. That re.spondent Leon olff is the author of the Survey Guide and was the agent of the succ.essful persons named in the advertisements; that he is one of the foremost experts in the United States on mail order business problems; and that purchasers will be given two free written opinions by the author of the Survey or Guide in his expert capacity at which time he will answer questions of their choice;

.

Complaint 52 F. T. C. 7. That the Surveyor Guide may be purchased in one transaction or by installments on an examination basis and that the' purchaser may obtain a refund if not satisfied. Said refund shall be the complete purchase price, if bought in one transaction: or all amounts paid by installments if all of the Surveyor Guide the purchaser has received is returned within seven days of the latest shipment of the Surveyor Guide he has received.

PAR. 6. The foregoing representations and implications are grossly exaggerated, false and misleading. In truth and in fact: 1. The purchase and study of respondent's Survey or Guide will not enable every purchaser to conduct a successful mail order business. The mail order business is extremely cro"\vded, competitive and riskv. Success comes only to a very limited number of beginners in this field and then. in practically all eases, only after continued and prolonged investment, experimentation and initial failures. ,Vhile the Surveyor Guide does contain factual information about the field in general, it does not present to the purchaser any information which will assure him of success. The beginner success will depend on his initiative~ background, product: knowledge, resources market conditions: and other fluctuating and uncertain factors, none of which can be satisfactorily determined by studying the Surveyor Guide.

2. The establishment of a mail order business with any chance of success at all requires a minimum of $300 to $500 capital readily available at the very outset. This amount is required for advertiseing and supplies alone and additional amounts would be required for the initial inventory of items to be sold. Respondent's Survey or Guide does nqt enable the purchaser to obviate this necessary prerequisite in any manner.

3. The successful mail order operators named in respondent's advertisements have not purchased and used respondent's Survey or Guide.

4. The examples of large incomes cited in respondent's advertisements are not typical of the mail order business and have not been achieved by hundreds of small operators who have purchased respondent' s Surveyor Guide. On the contrary, earnings for most operators in the mail order business are either non-existent or extremely limited. This is especially true for beginners. 5. The Survey or Guide offered for sale by respondent does not reveal confidential in:formation which has made fortunes for persons purchasing it.

6. Respondent is not the author of the Survey or Guide he sells and offers for sale and was not the agent for the successful mail L. W. MAIL ORDER SURVEY, ETC. 949 946 Decision order operators named in his advertising. He is not a recognized authority on mail order business problems. The free written opinions are given in practically all instances by respondent and only in rare instances are they given by the actual author of the Surveyor Guide. In all cases the purchaser is informed that the written opinions are given by respondent and that he is the author of the Surveyor Guide.

7. Purchasers of respondent's Survey or Guide who purchase by the installment method do not rece.ive a refund of their purchase money for prior shipments if they return said shipment within seven days of receiving their latest shipment. Under these c.ircumstances the purchaser receives a refund of his purchase money for the latest shipment only.

PAR. 7. The use by the respondent of the foregoing false, deceptive and misleading statements, representations and practices in connection with the sale and distribution in commerce of his Survey or Guide has had and now has the tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasers and prospective purchasers of said Surveyor Guide into the erroneous and mistaken belief that such statements and representations were and are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of the Survey Guide offered for sale in commerce by the respondent. As a result thereof trade in commerce has been unfairly diverted to respondent from his competitors and injury has been done to competition in commerce.

PAR. 8. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondent' s competitors and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

INITIAL DECISION BY WILLIAM L. PACK, HEARING EXAMINER The complaint in this matter, issued October 19 , 1955 , charges the respondent with misrepresenting a certain publication sold by him, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. An agreement has now been entered into by respondent and counsel supporting the complaint which provides among other things, that respondent admits all of the jurisdictional allegations in the complaint; that the answer filed by respondent to the complaint shall be considered as having been withdrawn, and that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and agreement; that Order 52 F. T. C.

the inclusion of findings of fact and conclusions of law in the decision disposing of this matter is waived, together with any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission; that the order hereinafter set forth may be entered in disposition of the proceeding, such order to have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing, respondent specifically waiving any and all rights to challenge or contest the validity of such order; that the order may be altered, modified, or set aside in the manner provided for other orders of the Commission; and that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that he has violated the law as allegedin the complaint. The hearing examiner having considered the agreement and proposed order and being of the opinion that they provide an adequate basis for an appropriate settlement and disposition of the proceeding, the agreement is hereby accepted, the following jurisdictional findings made, and the following order issued: 1. Respondent Leon ",Volff is an individual trading as L. vV. J\Iail Order Survey and as L. ,V. Publishers, with his office and principal.1 place of business located at 805 Larrabee Street, Los Angeles California.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondent, Leon Wolff, an individual trading as L. W. Mail Order Survey and as L. 'V. Publishers, or trading under any other name, and his agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of a course of instruction known as the "L. V\T Survey," or by any other name in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing, directly or by implication:

1. That it is possible for anyone to organize and conduct a successful mail order business wholly as a result of the purchase and use of respondent's Survey or Guide;

2. That a successful mail order business can be started on a "shoe string" or on less than adequate capital; 3. That successful mail order operators have purchased respondent' s Survey or Guide and have profited and benefited thereby, unless said persons have in fact purchased and subsequently used the Surveyor Guide;

L. W. MAIL ORDER SURVEY, ETC. 951 946 Decision 4. That unusually large incomes have been achieved wholly as a results of purchasing the Survey or Guide, or that unusually large incomes are typical of the mail order business; 5. That confidential information contained in the Survey fortunes for persons whoGuide in itself is capable of making purchase it;

6. That respondent is the author of the Surveyor Guide, or that he is one of the country s outstanding experts in the mail order business;

7". That refunds of all payments will be made to dissatisfied purchasers of respondent's Survey or Guide under given conditions conditions areunless such refunds are actually made when the fulfilled.

DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REFORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice 8th daythe initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the , ac-of :March, 1956, become the decision of the Commission; and cordingly :

It is o1'dered That the respondent herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and forll1 in which he has complied with the order to cease and desist. 952 FEDERAL TRADE COlVIMISSIO~ DECISIONS Complaint 52 F. T. C.

← 52 F.T.C. 934 · 52 F.T.C. 952 →