The Union Malleable Manufacturing Company
Volume 52 · 52 F.T.C. 408
Cite this decision
The Union Malleable Manufacturing Company, 52 F.T.C. 408 (1955). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v052-0053
Report an error in this record (decision id v052-0053)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF THE UNION M:ALLEABLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OONSENT ORDER, ETO., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 2 (C) OF THE OLA YTON ACT Docket 6366. Complaint, June 20, 1955-Decision, Oct. , 1955 Consent order requiring a corporation in Ashland, Ohio, to cease granting Sears, Roebuck & Co., large mail order house, on direct purchases of " Brand" plumbing products, an allowance amounting to brokerage in addition to the discounts allotted other customers, all of whom purchased through brokers, thus charging Sears, Roebuck prices lower than it charged other buyers by an amount reflecting brokerage fees, in violation of Sec. 2 (c) of the amended Clayton Act.
Before lJi1'. Frank Hier hearing examiner. lift. Donald If. King for the Commission. Mr. Samuel K. TValzer of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. COl\fPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the party respondent named in the caption hereof, and hereinafter Inore particularly designated and described, has violated, and is now violating, the provisions of Subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act (15 U. C. 13), as amended by the'Robinson-Patman Act, approved June 19 , 1936, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges with respect thereto as follows:
PARAGR:\.PH 1. The ,Union l\1alleable Nfanufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as respondent, is a corporation organized existing and doing business under the laws of the State of Ohio. Its executive offices and principal place of business are located at Cork Street, Ashland, Ohio. Respondent, in connection with its business operates two wholly owned corporate subsidiaries which are also located in Ashland, Ohio, and maintains sales offices in all principal cities throughout the world.
PAR. 2. Respondent corporation as aforesaid is now and has been since 1936 engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, and distributing malleable iron pipe fittings, steel pipe nipples, wrought steel couplings, cast brass solder joint fittings, floor flanges, bushings and other items of like character used in the plUlnbing trade. Such products are hereinafter referred to as plumbing products. Respondent corporation sells and distributes its products under its own brand namely, " Brand.
THE UNION MALLEABLE MANUFACTURING CO. 409 408 Complaint PAR. 3. Respondent corporation in the course and conduct of its business since June 19, 1936, and more particularly since January 1 1950, has sold and distributed and now sells and distributes its plumbing products to buyers located in the several cities of the United States other than the State of Ohio, and causes such products when sold to be transported from its place of business in Ohio to buyers thereof located in the several States of the United States other than the State of Ohio, and there has been since June 19, 1936, and more particularly since January 1 , 1950, a constant current of trade and. commerce conducted by said respondent corporation in such plumbing products between and among the various States of the United States' PAR. 4. Respondent corporation now sells and distributes and since~ June 19, 1936, and more particularly since January 1, 1950, has sold and distributed its plumbing products through two separate and distinct methods.
The first method is by selling to wholesale buyers through brokers ",ho usually designate themselves as manufacturers' representatives. Such brokers negotiate the sale of respondent corporation s plumbing products for and on account of the respondent as principal. Their only compensation for this service is the commission or brokerage fee paid to them by the respondent. Such commission or brokerage fee is customarily based on the percentage of the invoice as well as the price of the plumbing products sold: Such brokers act as respondent corporation s sales agents, soliciting and obtaining orders for respondent corporation s plumbing products at respondent corporation s prices and on its terms. This phase of respondent's business is not involved in the present proceeding.
The second method, which is challenged by this complaint, is by direct selling to Sears, Roebuck & Company. The respondent does not use brokers or other intermediaries in connection with the sale of its plumbing products to this company but rather sells its products directly to said buyer. Such direct buyer of respondent's products may be described as a large mail order house with numerous retail stores located in many cities and towns in the various sections of the United States. Such buyer transmits its orders for plumbing products direct and respondent corporation on receipt of said orders ships its plumbing products, as requested, either to said buyer s warehouses or to one or more of its retail stores.
Respondent corporation grants and allows said direct buyer an additional discount on such purchases, which additional discount is not allowed to buyers who purchase through respondent's brokers. This procedure permits said buyer to purchase said plumbing products at pricljs lower than the prices at which said products are purchased , & 410 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECIS;IONS 52 F. T. C. Decision by other buyers who purchase through respondent) brokers. The lower price which respondent charges said direct buyer is an amolmt which reflects all or a portion of the commission' or brokerage currently being paid by respondent to its respective brokers for effecting sales.
For the calendar year 1953 respondent's gross sales were $' 283 051 of which $633 220 represented gross sales to Sears, Roebuck Company.
L\R. 5. An illustration of respondent's pricing practices may be given through a comparison of respondent's Invoices No. 13254 and No. 13312, both of which are dated July 29, 1954. Invoice No. 13254 .lists as an item sold to Sears, Roebuck & Company 500 lh" galvanized Inalleable "L" iron fittings at a price of $130. 00 less a discount of 62-5- 5% (or 70.6%), resulting in a total discount of $91.78 and a net price of $38.22. Invoice No. 13312, on the other hand, lists the same quantity of the same item as sold to Frederick L. ~Iarkee of Grand Rapids, J\iichigan, at a price of $130. 00 less a discount of 62- 5% (or 69. 05%), resulting in a total discount of $89.77 and a net price of $40.23.
PAR. 6. Respondent corporation since June 19, 1936, and more particularly since January 1 1950 in connection with the interstate sale of its plumbing products by the second method set forth in Paragraph 4 herein, has paid and granted ' and is now paying and granting, directly or indirectly, commissions, brokerage, or other compensation or discounts in lieu thereof to Sears, Roebuck, & Company, a direct buyer of its plumbing products, who purchases said products for its own account. Respondent' s acts and practices as set forth above are in violation of Subsection ( c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended.
PAR. 7. The acts and practices of respondent corporation as above alleged and described violate Subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act (U. C. Title 15 Sec. 13).
INITIAL DEOISION BY FRANK HIER, HEARING EXAMINER Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act (15 U. 13), as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act the Federal Trade Commission on June 20, 1955 issued and subsequently served its complaint in this proceeding against the respondent which is an Ohio corporation with its office and principal place of business located at Cook Street in the city of Ashland, Ohio. THE UNION MALLEABLE MANUFACTURING CO. 411 408 Order On August 26, 1955, there was submitted to the undersigned hearing examiner an agreement between counsel in support of the complaint, respondent and its counsel providing for the entry of a consent order. By the terms of said agreement, respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint and agrees that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been made in accordance with such allegations; waives any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission; waives the making of findings of facts or conclusions of law; and waives all the rights it may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist agreed upon. Such agreement further provides that it disposes of all of this proceeding as to both parties; that the record on which any decision shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; that the latter shall not become a part the official record until and unless it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that it has violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the hereinafter set forth order to cease and desist may be entered in this proceeding by the Commission without further notice to respondent and when entered it shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing and may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders. The complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order.
On the basis of the foregoing, the underF;signed hearing examiner concludes that such agreement is an appropriate disposition of the proceeding and in accordance with the action contemplated and agreed upon makes the following order:
ORDER 1 t is ordel' That the respondent, The Union :Malleable :Manufacturing Company, a corporation, and its officers, directors, associates, or employees, directly or through any corporate or any other device, in connection with the sale of plumbing products or any other merchandise in interstate commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the aforesaid Clayton Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: Granting or giving, directly or indirectly, to any buyer, or to anyone acting for or in behalf of, or who is subject to the direct or indirect control of any buyer, anything of value as a commission, brokerage or other compensation or any discount or allowance in li~u thereof upon or in connection with any sale of plumbing products, or other commodities, made for the buyer s own account. Decision 52 F. T. C.
DEOISION OF THE OOM1\HSSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF OOMPLIANOE , Pursuant to Sec. 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice, the, initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 13th day of OCtober, 1955, become the decision of the Commission; and accordingly:
It is ordered That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60), days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist. MISS YOUTH FORM CREATIONS CORP. ET AL.
COMPLAINT