Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Sierra Candy Co., Inc

Volume 34 · 34 F.T.C. 1497

Citation
34 F.T.C. 1497
Docket
4758
Complaint
1942-05-07
Decision
1942-06-23
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
candy manufacturing
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Sierra Candy Co., Inc, 34 F.T.C. 1497 (1942). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v034-0140

Report an error in this record (decision id v034-0140)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF SIERRA CANDY COMPANY, INC.

COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOl:..ATION OF SEC. ~ OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS .APPUOVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket f758. Complaint, May 7, 1942-Dccision, Jwne f3, 1942 Where a corporation, engaged In the manufacture and competitive interstate sale and distribution of candy, including! certain assortments which were so packed and assembled as to involve the use of games of chance, gift £>nterprises and lottery schemes when sold and distributed to the con· sumers, typical assortments including, as lllustrative, one of 24 one-pounrl boxes of uniform size and shape, together with a push card for use in sale and distribution thereof under a plan by which amount paid by customers for said boxes was determined by number securf>d by chance from card, and another of 19 boxes with punchboard, for use under a plan by which customer, for 5 cents, by chance selection of certain designated numbers received one of said boxes, as did also the customer making the last punch in each of the first two sections into which the board was divided, or the last punch on the board, others receiving nothing for their money- Sold such assortments to wholesalers, to jobbers, and to retailers, by whom they were sold to the purchasing public in accordance with aforesaid plan, and thereby supplied to and placed in the hands of others means of conducting lotteries in the sule of its products under plan in question, involving gam~ of chance to procure candy at much less than normal retail price, in competition with many who do not use any such method; With the result that many persons were attracted by its said sales method and elemt>nt of chance Involved therein, and were thereby Induced to buy and sell its candy in preference to that of competitors aforesaid, whereby trade was unfairly diverted to It from them; to the Injury of competition in commerce :

lield, That such acts and practices, under the circumstances set forth, were au to the prejudice and injury <lf the public and competitors, were contrary to the public policy of the United States Government, and constituted unfair methods of competition In commerce and unfair acts and practices therein .

.Vr. J. W. Brookfield, Jr. for the Commission . .Vr. Da1-•id Ruben~tein, of San Francisco, Calif., for respondent. CoMrLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Sierra Candy Co., Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a Proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the interest of the Complaint 3-! I•'. T. C. public, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, Sierra Candy Co., Inc., is a corporation, organized and doing business under the laws of the State of California with its office and principal place of business located at 2203 Third Street, San Francisco, Calif. Respondent, is now, and for more than 6 months last past, has been engaged in the manufacture and in the sale and distribution of candy to wholesale dealers, jobbers, and retail dealers located at points in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent causes and has caused said candy, when sold, to be transported from its principal place of business in the city of San Francisco, Calif., to· purchasers thereof at their respective points of location in various States of the United States other than California and in the District of Columbia. There is now and has been for more than 6 months last past a course of trade by respondent in such candy in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. In the course and conduct of said business respondent is and has been in competition with other corporations and with partnerships and individuals engaged in the sale and distribution of candy in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 2. In the course and conduct of its business as described in paragraph 1 hereof, respondent sells and has sold to wholesale dealers, jobbers, and retailf'r dealers certain assortments of candy so packed and assembled as to involve the use of games of chance, gift, enterprises and lottery schemes when sold and distributed to the consumers thereof. Two of said assortments are hereinafter described for the purpose of showing the methods used by the respondent and are as follows:

One assortment includes 24 one-pound boxes of candy of uniform size and shape together with a device commonly called a push card. The said ptlsh card has 24 parti,tlly perforated disks on the faces of which is printed the word "Push." Concealed within the said disks are numbers ranging from 1 to 39 inclusive. ·when the disks are pushed or separated from the card, a number is disclosed. Purchasers pushing No. 1 pay 1 cent; those pushing Nos. 2, 8, or 39 pay 2 cents, 8 cents, or 39 cents, respectively, each purchaser paying the amount revealed by the punch which he has selected. The numbers are effectively concealed from the purchasers and prospective purchasers until the disks are pushed or separated from the card. The prices of said boxes of candy are thus determined wholly by lot or chance. SIERRA CANDY CO., INC. 1499 11!)7 Complaint Another of said assortments consist of 19 boxes of randy and a Pnnchboard. Appearing on the face of the punchboard is the following inscription.

5¢ A SALE 5¢ -20-40-60-80-100-120-140-\Vins % # Picture Top Box 160-180-200-220-240-260-280-300-210-\rins 1# Picture Top llox Last Punch in 1st 2 sections gone Wins 1% # Picture Top Box Last Punch on.Board Wins 3# Picture Top Box Said candy is distributed to the purchasing public by means of said Punch board in the following manner:

Sales are 5 cents each, and when a punch is made, a number is disclosed. The numbers begin with 1 and continue to the number of Punches there are on the board, but the numbers are not arranged in numerical sequence and said numbers are arranged in three sections. ~he board bears a statement informing purchasers and prospectivfl Purchasers that certain specified numbers entitle the purchaser thereof to receive a box of candy, and the purchaser of the last sale in each of the first two sections completely sold is also entitled to receive a box of candy, and the last punch on the board entitles the purchaser to rereive a box of candy. A customer who does not qualify by obtaining one of the specified numbers or the last punch in the first two sections of the last punch on the board, receives nothing for his money. The · boxes of candy are worth more than 5 cents each, and the purchaser who obtains a number calling for one of the boxes of candy receives the same for 5 cents. The numbers are effecti,,ely concealed from PUrchasers or prospective purchasers until a punch or selection has been made and the particular punch separated from the board. The candy is thus distributed to the purchasers of punches from the board Wholly by lot or chance.

The respondent furnishes and has furnished various push cards and punchboard~ for use in the sale and distribution of its candy by llleans of a game of chance, gift enterprise, or lottery scheme. Such PUsh cards or punchboards are similar to the ones herein describcll and vary only in detail.

PAn. 3. Retail dealers who purchase respondent's candy, directly or indirectly, expose and sell the same to the purchasing public in accordance "·ith the sales plan aforesaid. Respondent thus supplies ~o and places in the hands of others the means of conducting lotterie!:' ln the sale of its products in accordance with the sales plan herein- ~bove set forth. The use by respondent of said sales plan or method 1U the sale of its candy by and through the use thereof and by the aid 1500 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIOKS Findings 34F. T.C.

of said sales plan or method is a practice of a sort which is contrary to an established public policy of the Government of the United States. PAR. 4. The sale of candy to the purchasing public by the method or plain hereinabove set forth involves a game of chance or the sale of a chance to procure candy at prices much less than the normal retail price thereof. :Many persons, firms, and corporations who sell and distribute candy in competition with respondent, as above allegt>d, do not use said. method or any method involving a game of chance or the sale of a chance to win something by chance or any other method contrary to public policy. Many persons .are. attracted by said sales plan or method employe([ by respondent in the sale and distribution. of its candy and in the element of chance involved therein and are thereby induced to buy and sell respondent's candy in preference to candy of said competitors of respondent who do not use the same or equivalent methods. The use of said method by respondent because of said game of chance has a tendency and capacity to unfairly divert trade in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia to respondent from its said competitors who do not use the same or equivalent methods. PAR. 5. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondent's competitors and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce and unfair acts and practices in commerce within the intent and mea lling of the Federal Trade Commission Act. REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE Facts, AND Onder Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Trade Commission on 1\fay 7, 1942, issued and thereafter served its complaint in this proceeding upon respondent, Sierra Candy Co., Inc., a corporation, charging it with the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce and unfair acts and practices in commerce in vio~ation of the provisions of said ·act. On l\Iay 25, 1942, the respondent filed its original answer in this proceeding. In its answer the respondent admitted all the material allegations charged in the complaint to be true and, in accordance with rule IX of the Commission's Rules of Practice, by such an answer the respondent is deemed to have waived a hearing on the allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and t~ have authorized the Commission, without further evidence, or other intervening procedure, to find such facts to be true. Thereafter, the proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on said complaint and answer thereto, and the Commission, having duly considered the SIERRA CANDY CO., INC. 1501 Findings matter and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom. FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, Sierra Candy Co., Inc., is a corporation, organized and doing business under the laws of the State of California with its office and principal place of business located at 2203 Third Street, San Francisco, Calif. Respondent is now and for more than 6 months last past has been engaged in the manufacture and in· the sale and distribution of candy to wholesale dealers, jobbers, 11nd retail dealers located. at points in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent causes and has caused said candy, when sold, to be transported from its principal place of business in the city of San ·Francisco, Calif., to purchasers thereof at their respective points of location in various States of the United States other than California and in the District of Columbia. There is now and has been for more than 6 months last past a course of trade by respondent in such candy in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. In the course and conduct of said business respondent is and has been in competition with other corporations and with partner- ~hips and individuals engaged in the sale and distribution of candy In commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAn. 2. In the course and conduct of its business as described in ~aragraph 1 hereof, respondent sells and has sold to wholesale dealers, Jobbers, and retail dealers certain assortments of candy so pa~ked and assembled as to involve the use of games of chanee, gift enterprises, and lottery schemes when sold and distributed to the consumers thereof. Two of said assortments are hereinafter described for the Purpose of showing the methods used by the respondent and are as follows: .

. One assortment, includes 24 one-pound boxes of candy of uniform Size and shape together with a device commonly called a push card. 'lhe said push card has 24 partially perforated disks on the faces 0 ~ Which is printed the word "Push." Concealed within the said dtsks are numbers ranging from 1 to 39 inclusive. 'When the disks are pushed or separated from the card, a number is disclosed. Purchasers pushing No. 1 pay 1 cent; those pushing Nos. 2, 8, or 39 pay ~ cents, 8 cents and 39 cents, respectively, each purchaser paying he amount revealed by the punch which he has selected. The 1502 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIOXS Findings 34 F.T.C. numbers are effectively concealed from the purchasers and prospective purchasers until the disks are pushed or separated from the card. The prices of said boxes of candy are thus determined wholly by lot or chance.

Another of ~aid assortments consists of 19 boxes of candy and a punchboard. Appearing on the face of the punchboard is the follo·wing inscription:

ri¢ A S.\LE 5¢ -20-40--C0--80-100--120-1-10-Wins lh # Picture Top Dox 100-180-200--220--2-!0-2C0-280-300-210-Wins 1# Picture Top Box Last Puneh in 1st 2 sections gone Win!! 1%# Picture Top B:)x Last Punch on Board Wins 3# Picture Top Box Said candy is distributed to the purchasing public by means of said punch board in the following manner:

Sales are 5 cents each, and when a punch in made, a number is disclosed. The numbers begin with 1 and continue to the number of punches there are on the board, but the numbers are not arranged in numerical sequence and said numbers are arranged in three sections. The board bears a statement informing purchasers and prospective purchasers that certain specified numbers entitle the purchaser thereof to receive a box of candy, anu the purchaser of the last sale in each of the first two sections completely sold is also entitled to receive a box of candy, and the last punch on the board entitles the purchaser to receive a box of candy. A customer who does not qualify by ob· taining one of the specified numbers or the last punch in the first two sections of the last punch on the boaru, receives nothing for his money. The boxes of cundy are worth more than 5 cents each, and the purchaser who· obtains a number calling for one of the boxes of candy receives the same for 5 cents. The numbers are effpctively concealed from purchasers or prospective. purchasers until a punch or selection has been made and the particular punch separateu from the board. The candy is thus distributed to the purchasers of punches from the board wholly by lot or chance. • ' The respondent furnishes and has fnrnisherl various push cards and punchboarcls for use in the sale and distribution of its candy by means of a game of chance, gift Pnterprise, or lottery scheme. Such push curds or punchboards are similar to the one herein described and vary only in detuil.

PAR. 3. Retail dealers who purchase respondent's candy uirectly or indirectly expose and sell the same to the purcha~ing public in ac- SlERRA CANDY CO., INC. 1503 14!)7 Order cordnnce with the sales plan aforesaid. Respondent thus supplies to and places in the hands of others the means of conducting lotteries in the sale of its product in accordance with the sales plan hereinbefore set forth.

PAn. 4. The re.spondent's sales plan involves a game of chance, gift enterprise, m lottery scheme to procure candy at prices much less than the normal retail prices thereof. Many of respondent's competitors mentioned in paragraph 1 hereof do not use said method, or any method involving a game of chance, gift enterprise, or lottery scheme.

Many persons are attracted by respondent's sales method and the element of chance involved therein, and are thereby induced to buy and sell reEpondent's candy in preference to the candy of said competitors, and the use of said method by respondent has the tendency and capacity to, and does, unfairly divert trade, in commerce between and among various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia, to respondent from its said competitors. As a result thereof injury is being and has been done by respondent to competition in comm£"lce between and among various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein found, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondent's competitors, are contrary to the public policy of the Government of the United States of America~ and constitute unfair methods of eo111petition in commerce, and unfair acts and practices in commerce Within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Comlnission upon the complaint of the Commission and answer of the :respondent, in which answer respondent admitted all the material allt>gations of the Commission's complaint to be true, and by which answer, in accordance with rule IX of the Commission's Rules of Practice, respondent was deemed to have waived' a hearing on all ~he allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and to have authorlZed the Commission, without further evidence or other intervenincr Procedure to find such facts to be true; and the Commission havin~ lnade its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that the respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 1504. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Order 34ll'. '1'. c. It is ordered, That the respondent, Sierra Candy Co., Inc., Its officers, directors, representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale; sale, and distribution of candy, or any other merchandise, in commerce as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Selling or distributing candy or any other merchandise so packed or assembled that sales of such candy or other merchandise are to be made, or may be made, by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise, or lottery scheme.

2. Supplying to and placing in the hands of others, push or pull cards, punchboards, or other lottery device, either with assortments of candy or other merchandise, or separately, which said push or pull cards, punchboards, or other lottery device are to be or may be used in selling or distributing said cand.y or other merchandise to the public.

3. Selling or otherwise disposing of any merchandise by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise, or lottery scheme. It is further ordered, That the respondent shan; within 60 days after the service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in det11 il the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

AUTOGRAM CO. 1505 Comvlaint

← 34 F.T.C. 1491 · 34 F.T.C. 1505 →