Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Pioneer Merchandise Company, Inc.

Volume 34 · 34 F.T.C. 302

Citation
34 F.T.C. 302
Docket
4012
Complaint
1940-02-02
Decision
1941-12-09
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
cigarette holder distribution
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
S. B rogd yne T eu, II
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Cite this decision

Pioneer Merchandise Company, Inc., 34 F.T.C. 302 (1941). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v034-0029

Report an error in this record (decision id v034-0029)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF PIONEER MERCHANDISE COMPANY, INC.

COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER l:'i REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 4012. Complaint, Feb. 2, 1940-Decision, Dec. 9, 1941 Where a corporation engaged ln interstate sale and distribution, among other products, of cigarette holders composed of cellulose acetate which were similar In appearance to holders composed of amber, nonburnlng bakelite and other suitable materials- ( a) Represented and Implied to the purchasing public that its said products were made from amber, nonburning bakelite or other suitable material, and were of superior quality and' would give satisfactory service, through mounting them on dealers' display cards containing such statements as "Cigarette Holders for a cool and agreeable smoke" and "Extra Fine Cigarette· Holders";

Facts being its said cigarette holders would not give the public the service it was led to expect through such representations and similarity of such holders to those made of amber, nonburning bakelite, etc., but were made from material which disintegrated readily when exposed to heat, conveying an unpleasant taste to smoke coming in contact with the holder, so that user thereof would not obtain an agreeable smoke; and (b) Represented and Implied that It made the cigarette holders and other domestic-made merchandise sold by it, and owned, operated and controlled a factory ln which its holders were made, through such statements In circulars bearing Its name ana word "Manufacturers" as "When Buying from Us You Buy from the Manufacturer," and through representations on letter· heads and Invoices to the effect that it was a manufacturer; Notwithstanding fact it neither owned nor controlled any manufacturing plant in which its products were made, and was not a manufacturer, long preferentially dealt with by a substantial proportion of jobbers, dealers and consumers as, in their belief, eliminating the profits of middlemen and enabling them to obtain lower prices and other advantages; With effect of misleading and deceiving a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that such representations were true, and with result that said public purchased a substantial quantity of its cigarette holders and other merchandise:

lleld, That such acts and practices were all to the prejudice of the public and its competitors, and constituted unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce.

Defore Mr. John W. Addison, trial examiner. Mr. S. B rogd yne T eu, II for the Commission. Mr. J. Jerome [(atz and Mr. George Goodritz, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.

PIONEER MERCHANDISE CO., INC. 303 Complaint Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Pioneer Merchandise Co., Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has ~iolated the provisions of said act, and it appearing to the Commis- ~Ion that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public lnterest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, Pioneer Merchandise Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its office and place of business located at 928 Broadway, in the city of New York, N.Y. PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and has been during the year last past, engaged in the sale and distribution of cigarette holders and other Products. In the course of its business, respondent causes said comlllodities to be transported from its principal place of business in th~ State of New York to purchasers thereof at their respective points of location in: various States of the United States, other than the State of New York, and in the District of Columbia. There is now, and has been at all times mentioned herein, a course of trade in said cigarette holders sold by respondent in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its business as afores·aid, respondent has offered for sale and sold as cigarette holders certain Products composed of cellulose acetate. These cellulose acetate prod- Ucts are similar in appearance to, and resemble, cigarette holders composed of amber, nonburning bakelite and other materials suitable for, and long used in, the manufacture of cigarette holders. Respondent has caused such cigarette holders, composed of cellulose acetate, to be placed on display cards on some of which appears the following statement: "Cigarette Holders for a cool and agreeable Smoke," and upon others the following statement: "Extra Fine Cigarette Holders." These holders, attached to said display cards, Containing said statements, are sold to dealers located in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia for resale to the purchasing and consuming public, and said cards and holders tlre displayed by such dealers in offering for sale and selling' said holders to the purchasing public. 0 Through the similarity in appearance of the material from which Said holders are made to amber, nonburning bakelite and other mate- Complaint 34F.T.C· rials suitable for, and long used in, the manufacture of cigarette holders and the display of said holders on said cards containing said statements, respondent re,presents and implies, and the purchasing and consuming public is led to believe, that the said cellulose acetate cigarette holders are made from amber, nonburning bakelite or some oher material suitable for use in cigarette holders, and that said holders are of superior quality and will give the user thereof pleasant and satisfactory service.

In truth and in fact, the cigarette holders so sold and distributed by the respondent rrre composed of a material which is unfitted by composition to be used in a cigarette holder and such holders will not give the public the service it is led to expect as a result of the similarity in a_appearance of said material.to amber, non burning bakelite and other materials suitable for use, and long used, in manufacturing cigarette holclers. Said cigarette holders are not "Extra Fine," nor of superior quality, and the users thereof will not obtain a cool or agree.able smoke as represented by the respondent, for, in truth and in factor "the material from which said holders are made distintegrates readily when exposed to heat and conveys to smoke coming irt contact there· with an unpleasant and unsatisfactory taste or flavor. PAR. 4. Respondent, further, has distributed among prospective purchasers located in variom; States of the United States, and in the Dist~;ict of Columbia, circulars bearing the phrases: · ''Pioneer :Merchandise1 Co., Inc., manufacturers and importers," and containing such statements as "when buying from us you buy from the manufacturer"; and also has represented on its letterheads and invoices, distributed throughout the United States mails and in commerce as aforesaid, that it is a manufacturer. Through the use of the word "manufacturers," as above set out, respondent has represented, and docs now represent and imply, that it is the manufacturer of the cigarette holders and other domestic~ made merchandise it s.sells.

P,\R. 5. In truth and in fact, respondent does not make or manufacture the cigarette holders or the other domestic-made products sold and distributed by it. Respondent does not own or control the manufacturing plant in which the said products are manufactured. P.&..R. 6. There has long been a preference on the part of a substan· tial proportion of jobbers, dealers, and consumers to deal directly with the manufacturer, because of a belief that by the elimination of mid· dlemen's profits, superior products at lower prices, and other ad· vantages, can thereby be obtained.

PIONEER MERCHANDISE CO., IKC. 305 302 Findings PAR. 7. The use by the respondent of the representations set out in Paragraph 3 hereof has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to, and does, mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that such repre- I' sentations are true and that such cigarette holders are manufactured of proper material and are fitted and suitable for the purpose for l ~which they are sold, and into the purchase of said cigarette holders ln said erroneous and mistaken belief. 1: The use by respondent of the representations that it is a manufac- ~ turer, as set out in paragraph 4 hereof, has had, and now has, the f capacity and tendency to, and does, mislead and deceive a substantial l Portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken l belief that such representations are true and that it is the manu- ! facturer of the cigarette holders and other domestic-made products j offered for sale and sold by it, and into the purchase of said cigarette I' holders and other domestic-made products in said erroneous and :tnistaken belie£.

PAR. ~. The aforesaid acts and practices o£ the respondent as herein alleged 'are all to the prejudice and injury of the public, and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. RErouT, -FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND Onder Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Trade Commission on February 2, 1940, issued and sub- Sequently served its complaint upon respondent Pioneer Merchandise Co., Inc., a corporation, charging it with the use of unfair. and deceptive acts and practices in commerce in violation of the provisions 0f said act. After the issuance of said complaint and the filincrb of respondent's answer thereto, a statement of facts agreed to by counsel for the Commission, S. Drogdyne Ten, II. and counsel for respondent, J. Jerome Katz and George Goodritz, was read into the record and certain exhibits introduced by counsel for the Commission before John ·w. Addison, an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, and said statement of facts, a supplemental agreelllent as to certain facts dated August 28, 1941, and other evidence 'Were duly recorded and filed in the office of the Commission. Thereafter the proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on said complaint, the answer thereto, the agreed state- ~ent of facts and supplement thereto and other evidence, and brief lll support of the complaint (no brief having been filed by respondent and oral argument not having been requested); and the Commis- 466506m--42--voJ.34----20 Findings 34F. T.C.

sion having duly considered the matter and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom :

FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. Pioneer Merchandise Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of· the State of New York, having its office and place of business located at 928 Broadway, New York, N.Y.

PAR. 2. The respondent is now, and has been for some time past, engaged in the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of cigarette holders and other prodl,1cts. In the course of its business the respondent causes its commodities, when sold, to be transported from its place of business in New York, N. Y., to purchasers thereof located in the various States of the United States other than the State of New York and in the District of Columbia. There is now, and has been for some time past, a course of trade in cigarette holders and other products sold by respondent in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its business respondent has offered for sale, and sold, as cigarette holders certain products composed of cellulose acetate. These cellulose acetate products are similar in appearance to and resemble cigarette holders composed of am· ber, nonburning bakelite, and other materials suitable for and long used in the manufacture of cigarette holders. Respondent has caused its cigarette holders composed of cellulose acetate to be placed on display cards. On some of such display cards appears the following: "Cigarette Holders for a cool and agreeable smoke," and on other of such cards appears the following: "Extra Fine Cigarette Holders." These holders, attached to the display cards, are sold to dealers located in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia who purchase for resale to the purchasing and consuming public, and the display cards and holders are displayed by the dealers in offering for sale and selling to the purchasing public the cigarette holders of the respondent.

Through the similarity in appearance of the material from which the respondent's cigarette holders are made to amber, nonburning bakelite, and other materials suitable for and long used in the manufacture of cigarette holders, and the display of the respondent's holders on display cards containing the representations set out in the immediately preceding paragraph, respondent represents and implies PIONEER MERCHANDISE CO., INC. 307 302 Findings to the purchasing public and leads members thereof to believe that the cellulose acetate cigarette holders of the respondent are made from amber, nonburning bakelite, or some other material suitable for Use in cigarette holders and that respondent's holders are of superior quality and will give the user thereof pleasant and satisfactory service.

The cigarette holders sold and distributed by the respondent are not composed of the finest and best materials used in the manufacture of cigarette holders, and such holders will not give the public the service it is led to expect as a result of respondent's advertising representations as aforesaid and by reason of the similarity in appearance of t4e material used by the respondent in its holders to amber, non- ~urning bakelite, and other materials suitable for use and long used ln manufacturing cigarette holders. The respondent's cigarette holders are not "Exb:-a Fine" nor of superior quality, and the users of the respondent's cigarette holders will not obtain an agreeable smoke as represented by respondent. The material from which respond- Cllt's holders are made disintegrates readily when ·exposed to heat and conveys to smoke coming in ·contact with the holders an un- Pleasant taste or flavor. . PAR. 4. The respondent has distributed among its prospective purchasers located in various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia circulars bearing the phrases: PIONEER Merchandise Co. INc.

Manufacturers and Importers BUY DIRECT-SAVE MONEY Quality Merchandise at Lowest Manufacturer's Prices. When Buying from Us You Buy from the Manufacturer. You get the Right .Mercllandise at the Lowest Obtainable Price. 1. To Save Money by Buying from .Manufacturer. AN OPPORTUNITY 2. To Be Assured of Lowest Manufacturers Prices. { 3. To Receive Quality-Put Up the Way You Like It. It has also represented on its letterheads and invoices distributed by the United States mails and in commerce that it is a manufacturer. Through the use of the word "Manufacturer" the respondent has represented, and now represents and implies, that it is the manufacturer of cigarette holders and other domestic-made merchandise ~h~ch it sells, and that it owns, operates, and controls a factory in "Inch said holders are made.

The respondent does not make or manufacture the cigarette hold- "'1'" or other domestic products sold and distributed by it, and the 308 FEDERAL TRADE CO:MMISSION DECISIONS Order 34 F. T. C, respondent does not own or control the manufacturing plant in which its said products are manufactured.

PAR. 5. There has long been a preference on the part of a substantial proportion of jobbers, dealers, and consumers to deal directly with the manufacturer because of the belief that by the elimination of middlemen's profits superior products at low prices and other advantages can be, and are, obtained.

PAR. 6. The use by the respondent of the representations set out in paragraphs 3 and 4 above has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to, and does, mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that such representations are true, that the respondent manufactures the cigarette holders and other merchandise sold and distributed by it and, further, that such cigarette holders are of proper material for the purpose for which they are sold. As a result of such erroneous and mistaken belief the purchasing public has purchased a substantial quantity of the cigarette holders and other merchandise sold and distributed by the respondent.

CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices are all to the prejudice of the public and of respondent's competitors and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. · ORDER TO CEASE .AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade . Commission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answer of respondent, an agreed statement of facts and supplement thereto· and other evidence taken before an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, and brief in support of the complaint (no brief having been filed by respondent and oral argument not having been requested), and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. It is ordered, That respondent Pioneer Merchandise Co., Inc., -a corporation, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of cigarette PIONEER MERCHANDISE CO., INC. 309 Order holders and other merchandise, do forthwith cease and desist from representing, directly or by implication:

1. That cigarette holders or similar products made of cellulose acetate, or other material which disintegrates readily when exposed to heat or imparts an unpleasant taste or flavor to smoke coming in -contact with it, are a superior product, or satisfactory for the pur- Pose intended, or will give the user pleasant and satisfactory service. 2. That respondent is the manufacturer of cigarette holders or 'Other articles of merchandise which are not in fact manufactured in a plant owned and operated or directly and absolutely controlled by respondent.

It i8 further ordered, That respondent shall, within 60 days after the service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in 'Writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has 'COJnplied with this order.

Complaint 34F.T. C.

← 34 F.T.C. 290 · 34 F.T.C. 310 →