Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Thorp & Co., Inc., J. H

Volume 33 · 33 F.T.C. 381

Citation
33 F.T.C. 381
Docket
4310
Complaint
1940-09-12
Decision
1941-06-28
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
textile fabrics
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Robert Mathis, Jr
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Thorp & Co., Inc., J. H, 33 F.T.C. 381 (1941). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v033-0034

Report an error in this record (decision id v033-0034)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATI'ER OF J. H. THORP & COMPANY, INC.

COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO Tile ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN A,CT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 1,310. Complaint, Sept. 12, 1940-Deciswn, June 28, 191,1 Where a corporation engaged in the interstate sale and distribution of various grades and types of textile fabrics- Falsely represented in advertisements, price lists, on labels, and otherwise, through designations "sunfast," "tubfast," "washable," and "fadeless," that said fabrics respectively would not change or lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original" color when exposed to the light of the sun; would not change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when washed or laundered; and would not similarly react when exposed to sunlight or laundering j With tendency and capacity to mislead a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous belief that said statements were true, as a result of which a number of such public purchased its fabrics in substantial volume:

Held, That such acts and practices were all to the prejudice and injury of the public, and constituted unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce. Mr. Robert Mathis, Jr. for the Commission.

Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., is a corporation, organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its principal office and place of business at 250 Park Avenue, in the city of New York, and State of New York, and a branch office and place of business at 10 East Thirty-fourth Street, in the city of New York, and State of New York.

PAn. 2. Respondent is now, and for more than 1 year last past has been, engaged in business of selling and distributing various grades and types of textile fabrics. Respondent sells its products to members of the purchasing public situated in the various States of the lJnited States and in the District of Columbia, and causes said 435~26m--42--vo1.33----25 Complaint 33F.T.C.

products, when sold, to be transported from its places of business in the State of New York to the purchasers thereof at their respective points of location in various States of the United States other than the State of New York, and in the District of Columbia. Respondent maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a course of trade in said products in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District o£ Columbia. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its business, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution of its products, in commerce, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase thereof by the public, respondent has stated in advertisements, in price lists, on labels, and otherwise, that certain of its fabrics are "sunfast," "tubfast," "fadeless," "washable."

PAR. 4. By the use in advertisements, in price lists, on labels, and otherwise, of the statement or representation that certain of its fabrics are "sunfast," respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color when exposed to the light of the sun, by the use of statements or representations that certain of its fabrics are "tubfast" or "washable" respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color, "bleed," lose color or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when washed or laundered; by the use of the statement that certain of its fabrics are "fadeless," respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color and design when exposed to the light of the sun or washed or laundered. PAR. 5. Respondent's statements and representations that its fabrics above referred to are "sunfast," "tubfast," "fadeless," or "washable" are false and misleading, for the reason that said fabrics stated to be "sunfast" will change color, lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color when exposed to the light of the sun; said fabrics stated to be "tubfast" or "washable" will change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when washed or lalmdered; said fabrics stated to be "fadeless" will change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when exposed to the light of the sun or washed or laundered.

PAR. 6. The use by the respondent of the aforesaid false and misleading statements has had, and now has, a tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements are true. On account of this erroneous and mistaken belief, so induced by respondent, a number of the purchasing and consuming public have purchased a substantial volume of respondent's fabrics. J, H. THORP & CO., INC. 383 381 Finlliugs PAR. 7. The afor.esaid acts and practices o:f respondent as herein alleo-ed are all to the prejudice and injury o:f the public and constituteo unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE F AOTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act the Federal Trade Commission, on September 12, 1940, issued, and subsequently served its complaint in this proceeding upon respondent J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., a corporation, charging it with the use of unfair and deceptive nets and practices in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act. On October 26, 1940, the respondent filed' its answer, in which answer it admitted all of the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and waived all intervening procedure and further hearing as to said facts. Thereafter, the proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the said complaint and the answer thereto, and the Commission having duly considered the matter, and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceecling is in the interest of the public, and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom.

FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., is a corporation, organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its principal office and place of business at 250 Park Avenue, in the city of New York, and State of New York, and a branch office and place of business at 10 East Thirty-fourth Street, in the city of New York, and State o:f New York.

PAn. 2·. Respondent is now, and for more than one year last past has been, engaged in the business of selling and distributing various grades and types of textile fabrics. Respondent sells its products to members of the purchasing public situated in the various States of the United States and in the District o:f Columbia, and causes said Products, when sold, to be transported from its places of business in the State of New York to the purchasers thereof at their respective Points of location in various States of the United States other than the State of New York, and in the District of Columbia. Respondent maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a course of trade in said products in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

384 FEDERAL TRADE COC\U.:lission DECISIONS Conclusion 33F.T.C.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its business, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution of its products in commerce, and for the pm·pose of inducing the purchase thereof by the public, respondent has stated in advertisements, in price lists, on labels, and otherwise, that certain of its fabrics are "sunfast," "tubfast," "fadeless," "washable."

PAR. 4. By the use in advertisements, in price lists, on labels, and otherwise of the statement or representation that certain of its fabrics are "sunfast," respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color, lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color when exposed to the light of the sun; by the use of statements or representations that certain of its fabrics are "tubfast" or "washable" respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color, "bleed," lose color or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when washed or laundered; by the use of the statement that certain of its fabrics are "fadeless,:' respondent has represented that said fabrics will not change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color and design when exposed to the light of the sun or washed or laundered. PAR. 5. Respondent's statements and representations that its fabrics above referred to are "sunfast," "tubfast," "fadeless," or "washable" are false and misleading, for the reason that said fabrics stated to be "sun fast" will change color, lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color when exposed to the light of the sun; said fabrics stated to be "tubfast" or "washable" will change color, "bleed," lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when washed or laundered; said fabrics stated to be "fadeless" will change color, "bleed,:' lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors and designs when exposed to the light of the sun or washed or laundered.

PAR. 6. The use by the respondent of the aforesaid false ~nd misleading statements has had, and now has, a tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements are true. On account of this erroneous and mistaken belief, so induced by respondent, a number of the purchasing and consuming public have purchased a substantial volume of respondent's fabrics. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent as herein found are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. J. H. THORP & CO., INC. 385 381 Order ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answer of respondent, in which answer respondent admits all of the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint, and states that it waives all intervening procedure and further hearing as to said facts, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

It is ordered, That the respondent, J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., a corporation, its officers, directors, representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of its textile fabric products in commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Representing by the use of the word "sunfast" or any other word of similar import or meaning, that the colors of respondent's textile fabric products will not change color, or lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original color when exposed to the light of the sun.

2. Representing by the use of the terms "tubfast", or "washable". or any other term or terms of similar import or meaning, that respondent's textile fabric products will not "bleed" or lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors or designs when washed or laundered.

3. Representing by the use of the term ''fadeless" or any other term or terms of similar import or meaning, that rpspondents textile fabric products will not "bleed" or lose color, or otherwise deviate from their original colors or designs when washed or laundered, or exposed to the light of the sun.

4. Representing in any manner or by any means that the colors of respondent's textile fabric products will not change color, or will not fade, or will not deviate from their original color when exposed to the light of the sun, or when washed or laundered. It is further ordered, That the respondent shall within 60 days after service upon it of this order file with the Commission a report in Writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

386 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIOXS Complaint 33 F. T. C.

← 33 F.T.C. 377 · 33 F.T.C. 386 →