Robinson Clay Products Co., the
Volume 32 · 32 F.T.C. 538
Cite this decision
Robinson Clay Products Co., the, 32 F.T.C. 538 (1941). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v032-0062
Report an error in this record (decision id v032-0062)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE ~latter OF THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT COMPANY ET AL.
COJIIPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. IS OF AN ACT OF CO~GRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 4034. Complaint, Feb. 16, 1940-Decisicm, Jan. 29, 1941 \Vllere a number of corporations, firms, and Individuals, namely- I. Two concerns, to wit (a) a New York corporation which had a branch office and yard at Rochester and was a wholly owned subsidiary of a concern engaged, among other things, in manufacture and sale of vitrified sewer pipe, with plants and factories at various points in Ohio and Pennsylvania, and with office and principal place of business in Akron, Ohio, and (b) a Rochester firm or partnership which served as sales outlet at said point for another concern also engaged, among other things, in manufacture and sale of such pipe and with various factories for fabrication thereof and of kindred products in Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, and with office and principal place of business in Cleveland, which actively participated either in the wholesale or retail transactions relating to sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, ln said city and vicinity and manufactured or caused to be manufactured or sold the greater part of such commodities used in said sales area; and II. Some 25 or more corporations, firms and individuals, engaged in purchase and sale of builders' supply materials, including such pipe, in clty aforesaid and sales area adjacent thereto, and, as thus engaged, In purchas- Ing their supply of such materials and pipe from aforesaid manufacturers thereof or their sales subsidiaries, as above set forth, in other States, and in maintaining yards for temporary storage of products In question until sold or delivered to customers In or near said city (excepting carload or truckload quantities regularly shipped direct from place of manufacture to ultimate consumers at or near Rochester), and, as thus engaged, and except to extent to which competition in purchase and sale of such products had been restrained, lessened, Injured, or suppressed by understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy below set forth, in active and substantial competition with each other and with other wholesalers, jobbers, dealers, and contractors In such materials, in purchase and sale of materials in question and In conduct of their respective businesses in said city and State; to purchasers in which city many other sellers of building materials, and including vitrified sewer pipe, with places of business located without said State, sold large quantities of such materials In commerce, in active and substantial competition, except to extent to which competition between them bad been restrained, lessened, etc., by understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy above referred to, with each other in such sale and in sale of said products to Rochester dealers above referred to and to competitors of such dealers- Cooperated, both acting directly and through their various representatives, with each other, beginning In 1936 or thereabouts, and continuing thereafter and for a long period of time, entered into and carried out understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy to restrict, restrain, suppress, and ellm· THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 539 538 Syllabus inate competition and to create monopoly in sale and distribution of building materials, including -ritrified sewer pipe, in commerce; and in pursuance of, and for the purpose of carrying out, such agreement, understanding, combination, and conspiracy, and acting directly and through their designated representatives and in cooperation with each other- (1) Agreed among themselves to fix and maintain and pursuant to such agreement fixed and maintained uniform delivered prices to consumers at which they, and each of them, sold, or offered for sale building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to the consuming public, including municipalities and Government agencies and projects;
(2) Established and maintained minimum prices at which various items of build- Ing materials, including vitrified pipe, were sold or offered for sale by jobbers, dealers, or contractors in question, and uniform terms, discounts, and conditions attachlng to sale of various items of building supplies, including vitrified pipe;
(3) Induced certain of their nwmbcrs, by intimidation and persuasion, to raise the prices quoted by them to uniform delivered prices fixed as aforesaid, and held meetings among themselves to devise methods of exerting influence, or pressure, to require dealers, jobbers, manufacturers, and producers of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to fix, establish, and maintain delivered prices to consumers, including municipalities and other Government agencies or projects, and to fix, establish, and publish uniform delivered prices as well, and to abide by and adhere to said uniform delivered prices so fixed and established; and ( 4) Used and engaged in other cooperative acts and practices in promoting establishment of and carrying out aforesaid understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy set forth herein ;
With result that capacity, tendency, and effect of said understanding, agreement, combination, conspiracy, and acts and practices of said various corporations, concerns, and individuals, were and had been to monopolize in themselves or some of their number business and industry of dealing in and distributing building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, ultimately consumed at or in vicinity of Rochester, to unreasonably lessen, eliminate, restrain, stifle, hamper, and suppress competition in said Industry, to deprive purchasing and consuming public, including municipalities and other Government agencies or projects, of advantages in price, service, and other considerations which they would receive and enjoy under conditions of normal and unobstructed, or free, fair, and unrestrained competition in such industry, to otherwise operate as a restraint of trade and a detriment to freedom of fair and legitimate competition in said industry, and to obstruct natural flow of trade in building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, in channels of commerce, among and between the several States:
Held, That such acts and practices of sald corporations, concerns or firms, and individuals, under the circumstances set forth, were all to the prejudice of the public, and had a dangerous tendency to, and actually did, hinder and prevent price competition between and among them in sale of building materials, including vitrif!Pd pipe, in commerce, placed in them power to control and enhance prices, temled to create in them monopoly in sale of such materials and pipe, and unreasonably restrained commerce therein and constituted unfair methods of competition.
540 FEDERAL TRADE CO:MMISSION DECISIONS Appearances 32F.T.C.
Before Mr. Lewis 0. RWJsell, trial examiner. Mr. James M. Hammond for the Commission.
Sanders, Grarvelle, Whitlock & Howre1J, of Washington, D. C., and Slabaugh, Seiberling, Huber & G'uinther, of Akron, Ohio, for The Robinson Clay Product Co. and The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York.
Thompson, Hine & Flory, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Universal Sewer Pipe Corp.
Mr. Walters. Forsyth, of Rochester, N. Y., for Empire Clay Products Co., Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., Joseph L. Weckesser and Sinamus & Beck, Inc.
Harris, Beach, Folger, Bacon & Keating, of Rochester, N. Y., for American Clay & Cement Corp. and Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Mr. Harold H. Barnsdale, of Lyons, N. Y., for Barnard Service & Supply Co.
Mr. J. Eugene Goddard, of Rochester, N. Y., for Gaetano Della Pietra.
MacFarlane & Harris, of Rochester, N. Y., for Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc.
Chamberlain, Page & D'Amanda, of Rochester, N.Y., for Flower City Builders' Supply Co.
Mr. Maurice G. Ly'llln, of Rochester, N.Y., for H. D. Grey Corp. Goodwin, Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton & Devans, of Rochester, N. Y., for Hutchison-Rathbun, Inc., and Rochester Lime & Cement Corp.
Backs8 & Backs8, of Rochester, N. Y., for the Irondequoit Coal and Supply Co.
Mr. Daniel F. Fitzgerald, of Rochester, N.Y., for Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc.
Jefferson & Allen, of Rochester, N. Y., for Matthews & Fields and Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc. Peter G. & Jay A. Smith, of Webster, N.Y., for Russell B. Mason Co.
Mr. Robert lV. Lochner, of Rochester, N.Y., for Ardean R. Miller, Inc., and Rappl & Hoenig Co.
Mr. Fred J. Slater, of Rochester, N.Y., for Peoples Coal & Lumber Co.
Mann, Strang, Bodine & Wright, of Rochester, N.Y., for Rochester Lumber Co.
Mr. William B. Hanks, of Rochester, N.Y., for Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc.
THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 541 538 Complaint Ogden & Schwartz, of Rochester, N. Y., for Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc.
Oa.style & Fitch, of Rochester, N. Y., for Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc.
Raines & Raines, of Rochester, N. Y., for Whitmore-Rauber & Vicinus.
Bartholomew & Bartholome·w, of Buffalo, N. Y., for Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc.
iJfr. J. Raymond Tobin, of Rochester, N.Y., for Schreib & Watson, Inc.
Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the parties described in the caption hereof, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of the said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:
P ARAGMPH 1. Respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Maine, having its office and principal place of business in the Second National Bank Building, Akron, Ohio. It is engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of vitrified sewer pipe. It maintains and operates factories at Akron, Parral, Midvale, Mogadore, and Malvern, in the State of Ohio, and at Clearfield, in the State of Pennsylvania.
Respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business in the Empire State Building, New York, N.Y. It is entirely owned and controlled by respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co., and was organized by the latter concern for the purpose of marketing and furthering the sale of its said products to dealers, contractors, and to the public in the various States of the United States. Said respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co., of New York, maintains a branch office and yard at Rochester, N. Y., in which it stores its said products temporarily awaiting sale, and from which office and yard it supplies dealers and contractors in that city and in the sales area adj:lcent thereto with the said products manufactured by respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co., at its various factories 322695m--4t--VOL.32----35 Complaint 32F.T. C.
located at points outside of the State of New York, as hereinabove set out, and shipped from said factories to said yards of said respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York. Orders for vitrified pipe and similar materials received by it at Rochester are supplied direct from this yard, or if for carload quantities, the order may be, and generally is, filled by shipment from the said factories of respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co. in the States of Ohio and Pennsylvania direct to purchasers at or near Rochester, New York. Said respondents, The Robinson Clay Product Co. and The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York, at all times mentioned herein acted and now act concertedly and in cooperation with each other and with the other respondents hereinafter named in the acts and practices hereinafter alleged.
Respondent, Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Ohio, having its office and principal place of business in the Union Trust Building, Cleveland, Ohio. It is engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of vitrified sewer pipe and maintains eight factories for the fabrication of that and kindred products in the States of Ohio, J\Iichigan, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. The products of the respondent Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation so manufactured at its various plants or factories located as aforesaid, are sold and distributed through the medium of dealers, jobbers, and wholesalers located in the various States of the United States. Its sales outlet at Rochester, N. Y., is through the medium of the respondent copartnership, Empire Clay Products Co., hereinafter described. The latter company maintains a yard at Rochester, N. Y., where substantial quantities of the products of the respondent Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation are temporarily stored, unchanged and as originally manufactured, for sale and delivery to local dealers and contractors. The respondent Empire Clay Products Co. also receives orders for carload quantities of the said products of the respondent Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, which products are frequently shipped direct from the said factories of the latter company located in States other than the State of New York, to dealers, contractors, and other members of the public, including municipalities, at or near Rochester, including municipalities, at or near Rochester, N. Y. Respondents Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation and Empire Clay Products Co. acted concertedly and in cooperation each with the other, and in cooperation with the other respondents named in this complaint, in the acts and practices hereinafter alleged. THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 543 538 Complaint PAR. 2. Respondent Rochester Builders Supply Association, hereinafter referred to as respondent Association, is an unincorporated voluntary association, composed of dealers in building and construction materials in the city of Rochester, N. Y., having its office and principal place of business at the Seneca Hotel, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent, Edwin C. Kaelber, is an individual functioning as secretary of the respondent Association. His office and principal place of business is located at the Seneca Hotel, Rochester, N.Y. Respondents, Russell L. Pinkley and Urban G. 1Veckesser, are copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co., having their office and principal place of business at 735 uxington Avenue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, Frank A. Seiser, is an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Acme Builders' Supply Co. His office and principal place of business is located at 1030 Main Street, East, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, American Clay & Cement Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business at 1175 East ~fain Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents, Nazareth L. M:ontalbine and George E. Hartman, are copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of Bamard Service & Supply Co. Their office and principal place of business is located at 2450 Dewey Avenue, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent, Britton Stone & Supply Corporation, is a corporation existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business at 709 Commerce Building, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, Comac Builders' Supply Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 16 Norman Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, Gaetano Della Pietra, is an individual having his office and principal place of business on Linden Avenue East, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent, Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at 155 Gould Street, Ro~hester, N. Y. Respondent, John G. Bianchi, is an individual operating under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co. His office and principal place of business is located at 179 Cady Street, Rochester, N.Y.
544 FEDERAL TRADE COl\:IMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 32F. T. C. Respondent, Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 470 Hollenbeck Street, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent, H. D. Grey Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 186 Norman Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, Hutchison-Rathbun, Inc., is a corporation existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 255 North Union Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, The Irondequoit Coal and Supply Co., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 149 Ridge Road East, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 85 Palm Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 436 Conhy Avenue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents, Leslie E. Fields and Lena 1\Iatthews, are copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Matthews & Fields. Their office and principal place of business is located at 120 Stonewood Avenue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, R. B. 1\fason, is an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Russell B. Mason Co. His office and principal place of business is located at 205 North Avenue, 'Vebster, N. Y. Respondent, Ardean R. Miller, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal plaoe of business is located at 500 ·west Avenue, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent, Monroe Block Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal plaoe of business is located at 348 Exchange Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, 'Villiam Heydweiller, is an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co., having 'lhe ROlHNSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 545 538 Complaint ·his office and principal place of business at 4585 Lake Avenue-, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents, George Rappl and George Hoenig, are copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Rappl & Hoenig Co. Their office and principal place of business is located at 1441 Ridge Road East, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent, Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place o£ business is located at 174 Colvin Street, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent, Rochester Lumber Co., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 2040 East Avenue, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 1025 Chili Avenue, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent, Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws o£ the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 85 Stonewood Avenue, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 723 Clarissa Street, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place o£ business is located at 1503 Lyell Avenue, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Joseph L. 'Veckesser, is an individual having his office and principal place of business at 364 Aberdeen Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent, "\Vhitmore-Rauber & Vicinus, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 51 Griffith Street, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent, Sinamus & Beck, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business at 32 High Street, Fairport, N.Y.
Complaint 32F. T.C.
Respondent, Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at Pittsford, N.Y.
Respondent, Schreib & ·watson, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at Pittsford, N. Y.
All of the respondents named in this paragraph, with the exception of the respondent Association and respondent Edwin C. Kaelber, its secretary, are engaged, among other things, in the purchase and sale of builders' supply materials, including vitrified pipe, in the city of Rochester, N. Y., and the sales area adjacent thereto. The respondents named in this paragraph purchase their supply of building materials, including vitrified pipe, from the manufacturer thereof, located in States other than the State of New York and maintain yards for the temporary storage of said products until they are sold and delivered to customers in or near Rochester, N. Y., except as to carload or truckload quantities which are regularly shipped direct from the place of manufacture as aforesaid, to the ultimate consumers at or near Rochester, N.Y. PAR. 3. Respondent Association for more than 3 years last past had, and now has, for its purpose, among others, that of effectively aiding the other respondents or some of them herein named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, to carry out the agreement, combination, and conspiracy set forth in paragraph 6 hereof. Respondent, Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary of the respondent Association has assisted, aided, directed, and controlled, and now aids, assists, directs, and controls the organization of the said respondent Association; calls the meetings of its members and carries out for and on behalf of the members thereof the activities of the said respondent Association as hereinafter alleged. PAR. 4. The aforesaid respondents named in paragraph 1 hereof have actively participated either in the wholesale or retail transactions relating to the sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in the said city of Rochester, N. Y., and vicinity, and manufacture the greater part of that commodity used in that sales area. The respondents named in paragraph 2 hereof now constitute, and for more than 3 years last past have constituted, a substantial majority of all dealers in building materials, including vitrified pipe, used or sold in the city of Rochester, State of New York, and vicinity. In the course and conduct of their respective businesses, as afore- THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 54 7 538 Complaint said, except to the extent to which competition in the purchase and sale of building supplies, including vitrified pipe, has been restrained, lessened, injured, or suppressed by the understanding, agreement, combination and conspiracy hereinafter alleged, the respondent manufacturers, jobbers, and dealers in building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, have been and are now, in active and substantial competition with each other, and with other manufacturers, wholesalers, jobbers, dealers, and contractors in building materials, including vitrified pipe, in the purchase and sale of those materials. PAR. 5. For more than 3 years last past there were and have been, and there are now, many other manufacturers and sellers of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, whose respective factories and places of business were, and are now, located outside the State of New York, who have been, and are now, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling, or manufacturing or selling, building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, which they have been, and are now shipping in commerce between and among the several States of the United States, and who have been, and are now, selling large quantities of building materials to purchasers thereof located in the State of New York and shipping said building materials, including vitrified pipe, in commerce to such purchasers in the State of New York from States other than the Stat~ of New York. Except to the extent to which competition between said manufacturers and sellers, or manufacturers or sellers, of building materials, including vitrified pipe, and in the sale thereof for shipment in commerce into the State of New York from States other than the State of New York has been restrained, lessened, injured, and suppressed by the understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy here· inafter referred to, the said manufacturers and sellers, or manufacturers or sellers, in the course and conduct of .their respective businesses as aforesaid, have been, and are now, engaged in active and substantial competition with each other in the manufacture of building materials, including vitrified pipe, and in the sale thereof for shipment into the State of New York from States other than the State of New York, and in the sale thereof to the respondent dealers and to competitors of respondent dealers causing said prod~cts to be shipped to said respondent dealers and competitors of respondent dealers in commerce into the State of New York from States other than the State of New York.
PAR. 6. The respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, acting directly and through their respective representatives, and acting in cooperation with each other and with the respondent Complaint 32F. T. 0.
Association, and its officers, beginning in the year 1936, or thereabouts, and continuing thereafter for a long period of time, en- .tered into, and since have carried out, an understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy to restrict, restrain, suppress, and eliminate competition and to create a monopoly in the sale and distribution of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in commerce among and between the several States of the United States, as hereinafter described.
In furtherance of said understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy, referred to above, and in order to effectuate the same, said respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, acting directly or through their respective representatives, agents, or dealers, and acting in cooperation with each other, agreed to organize, and did organize, and still participate in the operation and control of respondent Association, and since its organization have participated and now participate in the activities of said Association, as more fully hereinafter set out.
Pursuant to, and for the purpose of carrying out said understanding, agreement, .combination, and conspiracy, said respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, acting directly and through their designated representatives, and acting in cooperation with each other, and in cooperation with the respondent Association, and its officers, have committed and performed, and continue to, and now do, perform and engage in, among others, the following acts and practices:
(a) Agreed among themselves to fix and maintain, and pursuant to such agreement have fixed and maintained, and now fix and maintain, uniform delivered prices to consumers at which the aforesaid respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof and each of them sold or now sell, or offer for sale, building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to the consuming public, including municipalities, and other Government agencies and projects. '(b) Established and maintained minimum prices at which various items of building materials, including vitrified pipe, are sold or offered for sale by the respondent jobbers, dealers, or contractors named herein.
(e) Induced certain of the aforesaid respondents by intimidation and persuasion to raise the prices quoted by them to the uniform delivered prices fixed as aforesaid.
(d) Interfered with or prevented competitors of respondent dealer3 from purchasing or obtaining building supplies from manufacturers thereof located in States other than the State of New York. THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 549 538 Complaint (e) Established and maintained uniform terms, discounts, and conditions attaching to the sale of various items of building supplies, including vitrified pipe.
(f) Held meetings among themselves or with the respondent As- £ociation, its members and officers, to devise methods of exerting influence, pressure, coercion, or other means of intimidation to require manufacturers and producers of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to fix, establish, and maintain delivered prices to consumers, including municipalities and other government agencies or projects, and to fix, establish, and publish uniform delivered prices as well, and to abide by and adhere to said uniform delivered prices so fixed and established.
(g) Used and engaged in other cooperative acts, coercive means and practices in promoting the establishment of and carrying out the aforesaid understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy se,t forth herein.
PAR. 7. The capacity, tendency, and effect of said understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy, and the acts and practices of the respondents, as set forth herein, are, and have been, to monopolize in said respondents, or some of them, the business and industry of manufacturing, dealing in and distributing building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, ultimately consumed at or in the vicinity of Rochester, N. Y.; to unreasonably Jessen, eliminate, restrain, stifle,, hamper, and suppress competition in said industry; to deprive the purchasing and consuming public, including municipalities and other Government agencies or projects, of the advantages in price, service, and other considerations which they would receive and enjoy under conditions of normal and unobstructed or free, fair, and unrestrained competition in such industry;. to otherwise operate as a restraint in trade and a detriment to the ft·eedom of fair and legitimate competition in said industry, and to obstruct the natural flow of trade in building materials, including vitrified Hewer pipe, in the channels of commerce, among and bet·.veen the !.'several States of the United States.
PAR. 8. The acts and practices of the respondents, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice of the public, and have a dangerous tendency to, and have actually, hindered and prevented price competition between and amoilg respondents in the sale of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act; have placed in respondents the power to control and enhance prices; have increased tha prices of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, paid Findings 32F.T.C.
by the purchasers thereof and consequently the prices paid by the public; have created in the respondents a monopoly in the sale of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, in such commerce, have unreasonably restrained such commerce in building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce within the intent and me,aning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Trade Commission on February 16, 1940, issued and on February 17, 1940, served its complaint on the parties named in the caption hereof as respondents, charging them with the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act.
After the issuance of said complaint and the filing of respondents' answers, the Commission by order entered herein granted the motions of respondents, The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York; Russell L. Pinkley and Urban G. Weckesser, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co.; American Clay & Cement Corporation; Nazareth L. l\fontalbine and George E. Hartman, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Barnard Service & Supply Co.; Comac Builders' Supply Corp.; Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc.; John G. Bianchi, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co.; Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc.; H. D. Grey Corporation; Hutchison-Rathbun, Inc.; Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc.; Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc.; Leslie E. Fields and Lena Matthews, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Matthews & Fields; R. B. 1\Iason, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Russell B. Mason Co.; Ardean R. Miller, Inc.; 1Villiam Heydweiller, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co.; George Rappl and George Hoenig, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Rappl & Hoenig Co.; Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation; Rochester Lumber Co.; Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc.; Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc.; Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc.; Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc.; Joseph L. Weckesser; 1Vhitmore-Rauber & Vicinus; Sinamus & Beck, Inc.; Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc.; and Schreib & Watson, Inc., for permission to withdraw their original answers and to substitute THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 551 538 Findings therefor answers admitting all the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and waiving all interrening procedure and further hearing as to said facts, which substitute answers were duly filed in the offices of the Commission.
After the filing of said complaint, respondent .Monroe Block Co., Inc., filed its ans\Yer admitting all of the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and waiving all interwning procedure and further hearing on said facts. Re!;pondents Robinson Clay Product Co., Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, Rochester Builders Supply Association, an association of building supply dealers, Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as Secretary of respondent Rochester Builders Supply Association, Ga.:>tano Della Pietra, an individual, and The ·Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co. filed answers denying the allegations of the complaint. X o answers were filed by respondent Frank A. Seiser, an individual, deceased on the approximate date of the issuance of the complaint, formerly doing business under the firm name and style of Acme Buihlers' Supply Co., and respondent Britton Stone & Supply Corporation, bankrupt on the date of the issuance of the complaint.
Therefore, this proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the record herein, and the Commission, having duly considered the matter and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom:
FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS r ARAGRAPH 1. The respondent The Robinson Clay Product Co. is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Maine, having its office and principal place of business located in the Second National Bank Building, Akron, Ohio. It is engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of vitrified sewer pipe. It operates and maintains plants and factories at various points in the States of Ohio and Pennsylyania. The respondent, The Robinson Clay Product Co. of X ew York is a corporation organized, existing and doing business pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located in the Empire State Buillling, Kew York, N. Y. It is entirely owned and controlled by respondent The Robinson Clay Prolluct Co. and was organized by the latter conc('rn for the purpose of marketing and furthering the sale of its said products to dealers, contractors, and to the public in the Yarious States of the Findings 32F.T.C.
United States. Said respondent The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York maintains a branch"()ffice and yard at Rochester, N.Y., in which it stores its said products temporarily awaiting sale and from which office and yard it supplies dealers and contractors in that city and in the sales area adjacent thereto with the said products manufactured by respondent The Robinson Clay Product Co. at its various factories located at points outside the State of New York, as hereinabove set out, and shipped from said factories to said yards of respondent The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York. Orders for vitrified pipe and similar materials received by it at Rochester are supplied direct from this yard or, if for carload quantities, the order will be, and generally is, filled by shipment from the said factories of respondent The Robinson Clay Product Co. in the States of Ohio and Pennsylvania, direct to purchasers at or near Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent, Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Ohio, having its office and principal place of business in the Union Commerce Building:, Cleveland, Ohio. It is engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of vitrified sewer pipe and maintains various factories for the fabrication of that and kindred products in the States of Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. The products of the respondent, Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, so manufactured at its various plants and factories, located as aforesaid, are sold and distributed through the medium of dealers, jobbers, and wholesalers located in the various States of the United States, including its sales outlet at Rochester, N. Y., respondent copartnership, Russell L. Pinkley, and Urban G. \Veckesser, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co., hereinafter described.
Respondents Russell L. Pinkley and U1·ban G. \Veckesser are copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co., having their office and principal place of business at 735 Lexington A venue, Rochester, N. Y. Said respondents maintain a yard at Rochester, N. Y., where substantial quantities of the products of the respondent Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation are temporarily stored, unchanged and as originally manufactured, for sale and delivery to local dealers and contractors. Said respondents also receive orders for car-load quantities of the said products of respondent Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, which products are regularly shipped direct fmm the said factories of the latter company, located in States other than the State of New York, to dealers, con- THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 553 538 Findings tractors and other members of the public, including municipalities at or near Rochester, N. Y.
PAR. 2. Respondent, Rochester Builders Supply Association, hereinafter referred to as respondent Association, was an unincorporated voluntary association, composed of dealers in building and construction materials in the city of Rochester, N. Y., including all or some of the respondent dealers, having its office and principal place of business at the Seneca Hot€1, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Edwin C. Kaelber is an individual who functions as Secretary of the respondent Association. His residence is located at 29 Dorchester Road, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Frank A. Seiser was an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Acme Builders' Supply Co. His office and principal place of business was located at 1030 Main Street, East Rochester, N. Y. He died during the year 1940, approximately simultaneous with the issuance of the complaint in this proceeding. Respondent American Clay & Cement Corporation is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place o:f business at 1175 East Main Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents Nazareth L. Montalbine and George E. Hartman are copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of Barnard Service & Supply Co. Their office and principal place of business is located at 2450 Dewey Avenue, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Britton Stone & Supply Corporation was a corporation existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York with its office and principal place of business located at 709 Commerce Building, Rochester, N. Y. Thereafter it changed its name to Sun Builders Supply Corporation and subsequently was declared a bankrupt. Its affairs are now in course of liquidation. Respondent Comac Builders' Supply Corporation is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 16 Norman Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent Gaetano Della Pietra is an individual having his office and principal place of business on Linden A venue, East Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at 155 Gould Street, Rochester, N.Y. Findings 32F.T.C.
Respondent John G. Bianchi is an individual operating under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co. His office and principal place of business is located at 179 Cady Street, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 470 Hollenbeck Street, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent H. D. Grey Corporation is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 186 Norman Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent Hutchison-Rat\1bun, Inc., is a corporation existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New . York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 255 North Union Street, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co. is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 149 Ridge Road East, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 85 Palm Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 436 Conkey Avenue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents Leslie E. Fields and Lena Matthews are copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Matthews & Fields. Their office and principal place of business is located at 120 Stonewood A venue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent R. B. Mason is an individual doing business under the finn name and style of Russell D. Mason Co. His office and principal place of business is located at 205 North Avenue, 'Vebster, N.Y.
Respondent Ardean R. Miller, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 500 'Vest Avenue, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Monroe Block Co., Inc., is a corporation organized nnd existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 555 538 Findings and principal place of business is located at 348 Exchange Street, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent William Heydweiller is an individual doing business under the firm na.me and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co., having his office and principal place of business at 4585 Lake Avenue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondents George Rappl and George Hoenig are copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Rappl & Hoenig Co. Their office and principal place of business is located at 1441 Ridge Uoad East, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 174 Colvin Street, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Rochester Lumber Co. is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 2040 East Avenue, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 1025 Chili A venue, Rochester, N. Y.
Respondent Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 23 Sheppler Street, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 723 Clari:.sa Street, Rochester, N. Y. Respondent Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 1503 Lyell Avenue, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Joseph L. 'Veckesser is an individual having his office and principal place of business at 364 Aberdeen Street, Rochester, N.Y. Respondent Whitmore-Rauber & Vicinus is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 51 Griffith Street, Rochester, N.Y.
Respondent Sinamus & Beck, Inc., is a, corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its Findings 32F.T.C.
offi.C€ and principal place of business at 32 High Street, Fairport, N. Y. Respondent Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at Pittsford, N. Y. Respondent Schreib & 'Vatson, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, having its office and principal place of business located at Pittsford, N. Y.
All of the respondents named in this paragraph, with the exce~ption of the respondent Association and respondent Edwin C. Kaelber, its secretary, are engaged, among other things, in the purchase and sale of builders' supply materials, including vitrified pipe, in the city of Rochester, New York, and the sales area adjacent thereto. The respondents named in this paragraph purchase their supply of building materials, including vitrified pipe, from the manufacturers thereof or their sales subsidiaries as named in paragraph 1 hereof, located in States other than the State of New York and ;maintain yards for the temporary storage of said products until they are sold and delivered to customers in or near Rochester, N. Y., exc€pt as to carload or truckload quantities which are regularly shipped direct from the place of manufacture, as aforesaid, to the ultimate consumers at or near Rochester, N. Y.
P.AR. 3. The respondents The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York and the Empire Clay Products Co. have actively participated either in the wholesale or retail transactions relating to the sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in the said city of Rochester, N.Y., and vicinity, and manufacture or cause to be manufactured or sold the greater part of said commodities used in that sales area. The respondents named in paragraph 2 hereof now con- &iitute, and for more than three years last past have constituted, a substantial majority of all dealers in building materials, including vitrified pipe, used or sold in the city of Rochester, State of New York, and vicinity. In the course and conduct of their respective businesses, as aforesaid, except to the extent to which competition in the purchase and sale of building supplies, including vitrified pipe, has been restrained, lessened, injured, or suppressed by the understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy hereinafter found, the respondent jobbers and dealers in building ,materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, have been and are now in active and substantial competition with each other, and with other wholesalers, jobbers, dealers, and contractors in building materials, including vitrified pipe, in the purchase and sale of those materials.
THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 557 538 Findings PAR. 4. For more than 3 years last past there were and have been, and there are now, many other sellers of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, whose respective places of business were, and are now, located outside the State of New York who have been, and are now, engaged in the business of selling building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, which they have been, and are now, shipping in commerce between and among the several States of the United States, and who have been, and are now, selling large quantities of building materials to purchasers thereof located in the State of New York and shipping said building materials, including vitrified pipe, in commerce to such purchasers in the State of New York :from States other than the Statt~ o:f New York. Except to the extent to which competition between said sellers of building materials, including vitrified pipe, and in the sale thereof for shipment in commerce into the State of New York from States other than the State o:f New York has been restrained, lessened, injured, and suppressed by the understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy hereinafter referred to, the said sellers, in the course and conduct of their respective businesses as aforesaid have been, and are now, engaged in active and substantial competition with each other in the sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, and in the sale thereof for shipment into the State of New York from States other than the State of New York, and in the sale thereof to the respondent dealers and to competitors of respondent dealers, causing said products to be shipped to said respondent dealers and competitors of respondent dealers in commerce into the State of New York from States other than the State of New York. PAR. 5. The respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, except The Robinson Clay Product Co., Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, Rochester Builders Supply Association, Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary of Rochester Builders Supply Association, Frank A. Seiser, deceased, an individual who heretofore did business under the firm name and style of Acme Builders' Supply Co., Britton Stone & Supply Corporation, Gaetano Della Pietra, and The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co., acting directly and through their respective representatives, have acted in cooperation with each other beginning in the year 1936, or thereabouts, and continuing thereafter for a long period of time, entered into and since have carried out an understanding, agreement, combination and conspiracy to restrict, restrain, suppress and eliminate competition and to create a monopoly in the sale and distribution of building materials, including 322695m--41--VOL.32----30 Findings 32F.T.C.
vitrified sewer pipe, in commerce among and between the several States of the United States as hereinafter described. Pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out said understanding, agreement, combination and conspiracy, said respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, except The Robinson Clay Product Co., Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, Rochester Builders Supply Association, Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary of said Association, Frank X. Seiser, deceased, an individual who heretofore did business under the firm name and style of Acme Builders' Supply Co., Britton Stone & Supply Corporation, Gaetano Della Pietra and The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co., acting directly and through their designated representatives, and acting in cooperation with each other, have committed and performed and continue to and now do perform and engage in, among other things, the following acts and practices: (a) Agreed among themselves to fix and maintain and pursuant to such agreement have fixed and maintained and now fix and maintain uniform delivered prices to consumers at which they sell, and each of them sold or now sell, or offer for sale building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to the consuming public, including municipalities and to Government agencies and projects. (b) Established and maintained minimum prices at which various items of building materials, including vitrified pipe, are sold or offered for sale by the respondent jobbers, dealers or contractors named herein. (c) Induced certain of the aforesaid respondents by intimidation and persuasion to raise the prices quoted by them to the uniform delivered prices fixed as aforesaid:
(d) Established and maintained uniform terms, discounts, and conditions attaching to the sale of various items of building supplies, including vitrified pipe.
(e) Held meetings among themselves to devise methods of exerting influence, or pressure, to require dealers, jobbers, manufacturers, and producers of building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, to fix, establish, and maintain delivered prices to consumers, including municipalities and other Government agencies or projects, and to fix, establish, and publish uniform delivered prices as well, and to abide by and adhere to said uniform delivered prices so fixed and established.
(f) Used and engaged in other cooperative acts and practices in promoting the establishment of and carrying out the aforesaid understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy set forth herein. PAR. 6. The capacity, tendency, and effect of said understanding, agreement, combination, and conspiracy and the acts and practices THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 559 538 Conclusion of the respondents named in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, except The Robinson Clay Product Co., Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, Rochester Builders Supply Association, Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary o£ said Association, Frank A. Seiser, deceased, an individual who heretofore did business under the firm name and style o£ Acme Builders' Supply Co., Britton Stone & Supply Corporation, Gaetano Della Pietra, and The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co., are, and have been, to monopolize in said respondents or some of them (except those specifically named in this paragraph), the business and industry o£ dealing in and distributing building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, ultimately consumed at or in the vicinity o£ Rochester, N. Y., to unreasonably lessen, eliminate, restrain, stifle, hamper and suppress competition in said industry; to deprive the purchasing and consuming public, including munici-· palities and other Government agencies or projects of the advantages in price, service and other considerations which they would receive and enjoy under conditions of normal and unobstructed or free, fair, and unrestrained competition in such industry; to otherwise operate as a restraint in trade and a detriment to the freedom o£ fair and legitimate competition in said industry and to obstruct the natural flow of trade in building materials, including vitrified sewer pipe, in the channels of commerce, among and between the several States of the United States.
PAR. 7. The Commission further finds that as to respondents The Robinson Clay Product Co., Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, Rochester Builders Supply Association and Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary of said Association, Gaetano Della Pietra and The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co., there is no evidence in the record in support o£ the allegations of the complaint. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondents The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York, a corporation; Russell L. Pinkley and Urban G. Weckesser, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co.; American Clay & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Nazareth L. Montalbine and George E. Hartman, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Barnard Service & Supply Co.; Comac Builders' Supply Corp., a corporation; Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; John G. Bianchi, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co.; Goodstone .Manufacturing Co., Inc., a corporation; II. D. Grey Corporation, a ..
560 FEDERAL TRAPE COMMISSION DECISIONS Order S2F. T. C.
corporation; Hutchison-Rathbun, Inc., a corporation; Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Leslie E. Fields and Lena Matthews, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Matthews & Fields; R. B. Mason, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Russell D. Mason Co.; Ardean It Miller, Inc., a corporation; Monroe Block Co., Inc., a corporation; William Heydweiller, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co.; George Rappl and George Hoenig, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Rappl & Hoenig Co.; Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Rochester Lumber Co., a corporation; SchaeffE-r Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Stonewood Builders Supply, Ino., a. corporation; Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc., a corporation; Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; Joseph L. 'Veckesser, an individual; ·whitmore-Rauber & Vicinus, a corporation; Sinamus & Beck, Inc., a corporation; Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; and Schreib & 'Vatson, Inc., a corporation, and each of them as herein found are all to the prejudice of the public; have a dangerous tendency to and have actually hindered and prevented price competition between and among the respondents named in this paragraph in the sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act; have placed in the respondents named in this paragraph the power to control and enhance prices; have tended to create in the respondents named in this paragraph a monopoly in the sale of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in such commerce; have unreasonably restrained such commerce in building materials, including vitrified pipe, and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answers of respondents: The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York; Russell L. Pinkley and Urban G. 'Veckesser, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co.; American Clay & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Nazareth L. l\Iontalbine and George E. Hartman, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Barnard Service & Supply Co.; Comac Builders' Supply Corp., a corporation; Domine Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corpora- THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 561 538 Order tion; John G. Bianchi, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co.; Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc., a corporation; H. D. Grey Corporation, a . corporation; Hutchison-Rathbun, Inc., a corporation; Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Leslie E. Fields and Lena Matthews, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Matthews & Fields; R. B. Mason, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Russell B. Mason Co.; Ardean R. Miller, Inc., a corporation; Monroe Block Co., Inc., a corporation; 'Villiam Heydweiller, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co.; George Rappl and George Hoenig, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Rappl & Hoenig Co.; Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Rochester Lumber Co., a corporation; Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc., a corporation; Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc., a corporation; Van de Visse & Kildea Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; Joseph L. ·weckesser, an individual; Whitmore-Rauber & Vicinus, a corporation; Sinamus & Beck, Inc., a corporation; Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; and Schreib & "\Vatson, Inc., a corporation, in which answers said respondents admit all the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint and state that they waive all intervening procedure and further hearing as to said facts, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and conclusion that said respondents have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. It is ordered, That the respondents The Robinson Clay Product Co. of New York, a corporation; Russell L. Pinkley, and Urban G. "Weckesser, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Empire Clay Products Co.; American Clay & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Nazareth L. Montalbine and George E. Hartman, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Barnard Service & Supply Co.; Comac Builders' Supply Corp., a corporation; Domine Builders Co., Inc., a corporation; John G. Bianchi, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Flower City Builders' Supply Co.; Goodstone Manufacturing Co., Inc., a corporation; H. D. Grey Corporation, a corporation; Hutchison- Rathbun, Inc., a corporation; Keystone Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Mann Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Leslie E. Fields and Lena Matthews, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of l\Iatthews & Fields; R B. l\Iason, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Russell D. Ordrr 32F. T. C.
Mason Co.; Ardean R. l\Ii11er, Inc., a corporation; Monroe Block Co., Inc., a corporation; 'Villiam Hl'ydweiller, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Peoples Coal & Lumber Co.; George Rappl and George Hoenig, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Happle & Hoenig Co.; Rochester Lime & Cement Corporation, a corporation; Rochester Lumber Co., a corporation; Schaeffer Brothers Builders Supply Co., Inc., a corporation; Stonewood Builders Supply, Inc., a corporation; Theodore H. Swan Brick & Tile Co., Inc., a corponttion; Van de Visse Kildea Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; Joseph L. 'Veckesser, an individual; Whitmore-Rauber & Vieinus, a corporation; Sinamus & Beck, Inc., a corporation; Pittsford Lumber Co., Inc., a corporation; and Schreib & ·watson, Inc., a corporation, their respective officers, representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution of building materials, including vitrified pipe, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from entering into and carrying out any understanding, agreement, combination or conspiracy between and among any t\lo or more of said respondents, for the purpose or with the effect of restraining, restricting, or monopolizing, or eliminating competition in the sale in interstate commerce of building materials, including vitrified pipe, and as a part of such understanding, agreement, combination or conspiracy from doing any of the following acts or things:
(a) Agreeing to fix and maintain and fixing and maintaining uniform or minimum delivered prices, terms, discounts, and conditions of sale.
(b) Inducing or coercing members of the industry to raise th~ prices quoted by them to the uniform or minimum delivered prices, terms, discounts, and conditions resulting from said understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy.
(c) Holding meetings among themselves or with any organiZlttion or association created by them, or some of them, to devise methods of exerting influence, pressure, or other means of inducing or requiring dealers in building materials, including vitrified pipe, to fix, establish or maintain prices, or to fix, establish and publish prices for building materials, including vitrified pipe, or to abide by or adhere to any uniform price list resulting from said under· r,tanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. THE ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. ET AL. 563 538 Order (d) Using and engaging in other cooperative acts and practices in promoting the establishment of and carrying out said understand· ing, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. It is further ordered, That this complaint be and is, hereby diH· missed as to the respondent Frank A. Seiser, deceased, an individual who formerly did business under the firm name and style of Acme Builders' Supply Co., because of his death. It is further ordY!'ed, That this complaint be, and the same hereby is~ dismissed as to respondent Britton Stone & Supply Corporation because of the change of name and ultimate bankruptcy of that eon cern.
It is further ordered, That the case herein be, and the same hereby is, closed as to respondents The Robinson Clay Product Co., a cor· poration; Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation, a corporation; Roche.s· ter Builders Supply Association, an association of building supply dealers; Edwin C. Kaelber, individually and as secretary of the Rochester Builders Supply Association; Gaetano Della Pietra, an individual; and The Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co., a corporation, without prejudice to the right of the Commission to resume trial of this proceeding as to them should the facts warrant. It is further ordered, That all of the respondents hereinbefor~ ordered to cease and desist from the practices described herein shall, within 60 days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. Syllabus 32F. T. C.