Consumer Law Library

Parker T. Frey Co., Etc

Volume 31 · 31 F.T.C. 1084

Citation
31 F.T.C. 1084
Docket
4290
Complaint
1940-08-29
Decision
1940-10-08
Document type
final order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
Clayton Act s2 / Robinson-Patman
Industry
food products brokerage
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Jl!r. John lV. Carter, Jr
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Parker T. Frey Co., Etc, 31 F.T.C. 1084 (1940). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v031-0118

Report an error in this record (decision id v031-0118)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE l\Iatter OF PARKER T. FREY, DOING BUSINESS AS PARKER T. FREY COl\IP ANY AND NEARBY SALES COMPANY COliPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 2 (C) OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED OCT. 15, 1914, AS A~IENDED B\: AN ACT OF' CONGRESS APPROVED JUNE 19, 1936 Docket 4·290. Complaint, Aug. 29, 1940-Decision, Oct. 8, 1940 Where an individual engaged for many years, In his own right and trading under certain firm names, in (1) acting as broker in :;;ale of food products, and particularly canned sea food and vegetables; and in (2) buying nnd selling, for his own account, such products, and in causing same, thus purchased, to be shipped and transported by sellers thereof from their respective other States to himself or, pursuant to instructions and directions, to respective purchasers to whom said produ<>ts had been re~old by him- Received and accepted, in course of business of buying, as aforesaid, for his own account, such products, from numerous sellers thereof, brokerage fee or allowance or discount in lieu thereof on many purchases mode, as above set forth, for his said own account and for resale: Held, That, in accepting and receiving discounts and allowances in lieu of brokerage upon such own account purchases in interstate commerce as above set forth, he violated provisions of section 2 (c) of Clayton Act, as amended by Robinson-Patman Act.

Jlr. John lV. Carter, Jr., for the Commission. Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress approved October 15, 1914, entitled "An act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes," commonly known as the Clayton Act (U. S. C. title 15, sec. 13), as amended by an act of Congress approved June 19, 1936, commonly known as the Robinson-Patman Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the party respondent named in the caption hereof and hereinafter more particularly designated and described, since June 19, 1936, has been,· and is now, violating the provisions of subsection (c) of section 2 of said act, as amended, issues its complaint against said respondent and states its charges with respect thereto as follows, to wit:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Parker T. Frey is an individual doing business principally under the firm name and style of the Parker T. Frey Co. but also under the firm name and style of the Nearby Sales Co. The respondent has his principal office-e and place of business at 135 South Second Street, Philadelphia. PARKER T. FREY CO. ETC. 1085 1084 Findings PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and for many years prior hereto has been, engaged in the business of acting as broker in the sale of food products, particularly canned sea food and vegetables, said business having been carried on by him principally under the firm name and style of Parker T. Frey Co.

Respondent is also engaged, and for many years prior hereto has been engaged, in the business of buying and selling for his own account food products, particularly canned sea food and ve.getables, said business having been carried on by him principally under the firm name and style of the Nearby Sales Co. but also under the firm name and style of Parker T. Frey Co.

Since June 19, 1936, respondent has made many purchases of said food products aforementioned, for his own account, for resale, from sellers located in Stat~s other than the State of Pennsylvania, pursuant to which purchases, such commodities have been shipped and transported by the sellers thereof from the respective States in which they are located, across State lines, either to rpspondent, or pursuant to instructions and directions from respondent, to the respective purchasers to whom such products have been resold by said respondent.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of his business of buying food products for his ovm account in commerce as aforesaid, the respondent, trading under the firm names and styles aforementioned, has been, and is now, receiving and accepting from numerous sellers of said products, so purchased, brokerage fees, or allowances or discounts in lieu thereof, on many of said purchases for his own account. P .AR. 4. The aforesaid acts of the respondent constitute a violation of subsection (c) of section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, approved June 19, 1936. REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress entitled "An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies and for other purposes," approved October 15, 1914, the Clayton Act, as amended by an act of Congress approved June 19, 1936, The Robinson-Patman Act (U. S. C. title 15, sec. 13), the Federal Trade Commission on the 29th day of August 1940, issued and served its complaint in this proceeding upon respondent, Parker T. Frey, charging the respondent with violation of the provisions of subsection (c) of section 2 of the said act.

On September 9, 1940, the respondent filed his answer, admitting all the material allegations of fact set for1h in said complaint, waiving Findings 31F.T.C.

all intervening procedure and further hearings as to said facts, and waiving the filing of briefs and presentation of oral argument. Thereafter the proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the complaint and answer as aforesaid, and the Commission, having duly considered the matter and being now fully advised in the premises and being of the opinion that section 2 (c) of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act has been viola too by the respondent, now makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom.

FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. The respondent, Parker T. Frey, is an individual who, in his own right and trading principally under the style and firm name of Parker T. Frey Co. and oftentimes under the style and firm name of Nearby Sales Co., is now, and for many years prior hereto has been, engaged in the business of acting as broker in the sale of food products, particularly canned sea food and vegetables. Respondent's principal office and place of business is now located at 8 South Front Street, Philadelphia, Pa.

PAR. 2. The respondent, in his own right and trading principally under the style and firm name of Nearby Sales Co. and oftentimes under the style and firm name of Parker T. Frey Co., is now, and for many years prior hereto has been, engaged in the business of buying and selling for his own account for resale food products, particularly canned sea food and vegetables, and since June 19, 1936, has caused such food products so purchased for his own account as aforesaid to be shipped and transported by the sellers thereof from the respective States in which such sellers are located across State lines either to respondent, or, pursuant to instructions and directions from respondent, to the respective purchasers to whom such products have been resold by respondent.

PAR. 3. That in the course of the business of buying such food products aforesaid for his own account in commerce for resale, as aforesaid, the said respondent, Parker T. Frey, trading in his own behalf and right principally under the style and firm name of Nearby Sales Co. and oftentimes under the name of Parker T. Frey Co., has received and accepted, and is now receiving and accepting, from numerous sellers of such products, so purchased, a brokerage fee, or an allowance or discount in lieu thereof, on many purchases made as aforesaid for his own account for resale.

PARKER T. FREY CO. ETC. 1087 1084 Order CONCLUSION In accepting and receiving discounts and allowances in lieu of brokerage upon purchases of commodities for his own account in interstate commerce, as set forth in the foregoing findings as to the facts, the respondent, Parker T. Frey, individually and while trading under the style and firm name of Nearby Sales Co., and also while trading under the style and firm name of Parker T. Frey Co., violated the provisions of section 2 (c) of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act.

ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answer of respondent, in which answer respondent admits all the material allegations of fact set forth in said complaint, and states that it waives all intervening procedure and further hearing as to said facts, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that the respondent has violated the provisions of section 2 (c) of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman .Act, approved June 19, 1936 (U. S. C. title 15, sec. 13).

It i.s ordered, That in purchasing commodities in interstate commerce the respondent, P<lrker T. Frey, individually, and trading under the names of Nearby Sales Co. and Parker T. Frey Co., or any other name, his agents, employees, and representatives, directly or through any corporate or other device, llo forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Aceepting from sellers directly or indirectly on purchases of commodities made for the respondent's own account any brokerage and any allowances and discounts in lieu of brokerage, in whatever manner or form said allowances and discounts may be offered, allowed, granted, paid or transmitted; and 2. Accepting from sellers in any manner or form whatever, directly or indirectly, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or otlu'r compensation or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof upon purchases of commodities made for respondent's own account. It is further ordered, That the said respondent, Parker T. Frey, shall, within 60 days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with the order to cease and desist hereinabove set forth.

Complaint 31 F. T. C.

← 31 F.T.C. 1076 · 31 F.T.C. 1088 →