Consumer Law Library

Barr, Henry 0

Volume 29 · 29 F.T.C. 61

Citation
29 F.T.C. 61
Docket
3432
Complaint
1938-05-20
Decision
1939-06-13
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
incense
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Respondent counsel
llfr. lV ilUam Schiepan, of Chicago, Ill
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Barr, Henry 0, 29 F.T.C. 61 (1939). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v029-0009

Report an error in this record (decision id v029-0009)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MA'ITER OF HENRY 0. HARR, DOING BUSINESS AS EASTERN TRADING COMPANY COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APrHOVED Sert. 26, 1914 Docket 3q.3.2. Complaint, May 20, 1938-Decision, Juue 13, 1939 Where an individual engaged in sale and distribution of Incense to purchase1·s In various other States- Falsely rl'presented, through printed matter on cartons or contaitwrs of his said product and in pamphlets enclosed therl'with, that snme possessed Cl'l'tain mystical eharm, and that lucky numbers which appl'nred in ashes thereof were key to one's fortune, and might Le lntl'rpl·eted through comparing such uumLer with numbers appearing in booklets supplied; With effect of misleading and deceiving substantial portion of purchasing public into erroneous belief that such rrpresentations were true, and into purchase of substantial quantities of his said incense as result thereof, and of thereby diverting substantial trade in commerce in qu~>stion to him.~elf from com-• petltors engaged in sale and distribution of said product In eommercil among the States and In the District of Columbia, and who do not misrepresent the qualities, characteristics and attributes of incense offered and sold by them:

Held, That such acts and practices, as abo,·e set for·th, wet·e ali to the prejudice and Injury of the public and competitors and constituted unfair methods ·of competition, ' Before 11/r, lV. lV. Sheppard, trial examiner. 11/r. De 1V itt T. Puckett for the Commission. llfr. lV ilUam Schiepan, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent. CmrPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Henry 0. Harr, an individual, doing business as Eastern Trading Co., hereinafter re-ferred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of the said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its c11argues as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Tlle respondent, Henry 0. Harr, is an individual, doing business as the Enstern Tmding Co., at 3974 Vincennes Ave~ nue, Chicago, Ill. He is engaged in the sale and distribution of Incense.

Complaint• 29F.T.C..

Respondent now causes, and for several years last past has caused~ his said incense, when sold, to be shipped from his said place of business in Chicago, Ill., to the purchasers thereof, located in the various: States of tlle United States other than the State of Illinois, and in the District of Columbia. There is now, and has been at all times. mentioned herein, a course of trade in said incense so sold and distributed by the respondent in commerce between and among _the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent is, and for several years last past has been, in substantial competition with other individuals, and with partnerships. and corporations, engaged in the sale and distribution of incense in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 2. In the course and conduct of his business, as aforesaid~ the respondent has advertised and now advertises his said incense in trade papers, pamphlets, and in various other ways as follows~ Light the top corner of a triangle "Lucky Number'' Incense cake, and bring the subtle charm, the mysterious fragrance and the glamor of the Orient with all Its delicate aroma Into your home. Stand on long edge, watching both sides till the "Lucky Number'' appears in the ashes. This number may be the key to all your Fortunes and Dreams, helping you to get Luck, Love, Happi· ness and Prosperity.

Lucky Number Incense.

• • • and a mysterious voice rising from the fragrant curling smoke spoke In a wraith-like whisper-"BEHOLD!!! I open to you the portals of the future; look, and heed well, for so shall ye live." Have your fortune read each morning by burning a cake of Lucky Number Incense, wherein there shall magically appear in the burned white ashes~ a number that is the key to your day's fortune. In each box of Lucky Number Incense, there is enclosed a Fortune and Dream Booklet with readings for the future against the corresponding numbers as have become visible in the burned ashes.

PAR. 3. The aforesaid advertising claims serve as representations on the part of respondent to purchasers and prospective purchasers that his said incense possesses certain mystical charms; that lucky numbers appcar in the ashes of said incense, which numbers are the key to one's fortune; and that a mysterious voice arises from the smoke emitted from the burning incense.

In truth and in fact, respondent's incense possesses no mysterious charms, and no voice arises from the smoke t~mitted therefrom. Numbers do not magically appear in the ashes of said incense and such numbers that do appear, if they do, have no value or meaning whatever.

PAR. 4. There are among the competitors of respondent, as mem• tioned in paragraph 1 hereof, individuals, partnerships, and cor- EASTERN TRADING CO. 63 61 Findings porations engaged in the sale and distribution of incense that do not misrepresent the qualities, characteristics, and attributes of the incensa which they offer for sale and sell.

PAR. 5. The use by respondent of the representations set forth herein has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to mislead and deceive, and has misled and deceived, a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous belief that such representations are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondent's incense as a result of such erroneous belief. As a result of the acts and practices of the respondent as aforesaid substantial trade in said commerce is diverted unfairly to respondent from his aforesaid competitors, to their injury and to the injury of the public. PAn. 6. The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent as herein alleged are all to the prejudice of the public and of respondent's competitors and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Com· mission Act.

REPORT' FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Trade Commission on the 20th day of May 1938, issued and served its complaint in this proceeding upon the respondent, Henry 0. Harr, an individual doing business as Eastern Trading Company, charging him with the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act. After the issuance of said complaint and the filing of respondent's answer thereto, testimony and other evidence in support of the allegations of said complaint were introduced by De Witt T. Puckett, attorney for the Commission, before ,V. 'V. Sheppard, an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it. William Schiepan, attorney for the respondent, introduced no testimony or evidence except he introduced in evidence one of respondent's labels. All of the testimony and other evidence were duly recorded and filed in the office of the Commission. Thereafter, the proceedings regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the said complaint, the answer thereto, the testimony an1 other evidence, brief in support of complaint, no brief having been filed by respondent. And the Commission having duly considered the matter, and being now fully ad vised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom.

64 FEDERAL TRADE 001\Il\USSION DECISIONS Findings 29F.T. C.

FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, Henry 0. Harr, is an individual doing business as Eastern Trading Company, having his principal place of business at 3974 Vincennes Avenue, Chicago, Ill. Respondent has continuously since the year 1928 been engaged in the sale and distribution of incense. In the course and conduct of his business the respondent causes his incense, when sold, to be shipped from his place of business in the city of Chicago, in the State of Illinois, to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States. At all times mentioned herein respondent has maintained a course of trade in the said incense sold and distributed by him in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and since the year 1928 has been, in substantial competition with other individuals and with partnerships and corporations engaged in the sale and distribution of incease in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. PAR. 3. Respondel)t's sales of incense average $1,000 a month. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of his business the respondent has advertised and now advertises his said incense by means of pri.nted matter appearing on cartons, boxes, or containers in which his said incense is offered for sale and sold and also in pamphlets jnclosed in said cartons, boxes or containers. Typical of the representations appearing in such advertising as above described are the following:

Light the top corner of a triangle "Lucky Number" Incense cake, and bring the subtile charm, the mysterious fragrance and the glamour of the Orient, with all its delicate aroma, Into your home. Stand on long edge, watching both sides till the "Lucky Numbet·" appears in the ashes. This number may be the Key to all your Fortunes and Dreams, helping you to get Luck, Love, Happiness and Prosperity.

Gradually, In the ashes of the burning incense, a mystic number will appear·. The enclosed booklet will help you to understand a meaning of this "Lucky Number."

PAR. 5. Respondent, up to the time of the filing of the complaint in this proceeding, placed in the boxes or containers containing his incense, booklets which purported to tell the fortune of the one burning the incense. This was accomplished by comparing the number appearing in the ashes in the incense with the numbers appearing in the booklet.

I EASTERN TRADING CO. 65 I 61 Order PAR. 6. Through the use of the statements and representations hereinabove set forth and others similar thereto not specifically set out herein, respondent has represented, and does now represent, io purchasers and prospective purchasers of his incense that his product possesses certain mystical charm; that lucky numbers appear in the ashes of the said incense which are the key to one's fortune. PAR. 7. In truth and in fact respondent's incense possesses no mysterious charms and numbers do not magically appear in the ashes of said incense and such numbers that do appear, if they do appear, have no value or meaning whatever.

PAR. 8. There are among the competitors of respondent individuals, partnerships and corporations engaged in the sale and distribution of incense in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia who do not misrepresent the qualities, characteristics and attributes of the incense which they offer for sale and sell.

PAR. 9. The use by the respondent of the representations hereinabove set forth has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to mislead and deceive, and has misled and deceived, a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous belief that such representations are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondent's incense as the result of such erroneous belief. As a result of the acts and practices of the respondent, as aforesaid, substantial trade in said commerce is diverted unfairly to respondent from his aforesaid competitors.

CONCLUSION The acts and practices of the respondent, as herein found, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of rpspondents competitors and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answl'r of respondent, testimony and other evidence taken before ,V, ,V. Sheppard, an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, in support of the allegations of said complaint and in opposition thereto (no brief having been filed by respondent and oral argument not having been requested) and the Commission having made its findings al? to the facts and its conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. FEDERAL TRADE COMl\IISSION DECISIONS66 Order 29F. T. C.

It i8 ordered, That the respondent, Henry 0. Harr, individually or doing business as Eastern Trading Company or trading under any other name or through any corporate or other device, his agents, employees, and representatives, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution o£ incense in commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing:

1. That respondent's said incense possesses mystical charms. 2. That lucky numbers appear in the ashes of said incense. 3. That numbers which appear in the ashes o:f said incense are the keys to one's fortune, or have any significance or meaning whatever. It is further ordered, That the respondent shall, within 60 days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order.

U. S. ORDNANCE ENGINEERS, INC., ET AL. 67 Syllabus

← 29 F.T.C. 53 · 29 F.T.C. 67 →