American Shell Products Company
Volume 21 · 21 F.T.C. 237
product labelingdeceptive advertising
Cite this decision
American Shell Products Company, 21 F.T.C. 237 (1935). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v021-0029
Report an error in this record (decision id v021-0029)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF AMERICAN SHELL PRODUCTS COMPANY COMPLAINT {SYNOPSIS), FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 2258. Complaint, Dec. 10, 1~34-Decision, Aug. 13, 193.'i Where a corporation engaged in buying and crushing mussel and oyster shells, and 11). the sale of such crushed shell to wholesale and retail dealers in the various States for ultimate resale to the purchasing public for use in feeding chickens- (a) Featured word "oyster'' upon the labels of the sacks in which it sold various brands of its said product, containing proportions of oyster shell ranging from 50 percent to 5 percent, depending upon the particular brand involved, and displayed word "mussel" in an obscure place, and in relatively Inconspicuous fashion, and in such small plain letters as compared with the large shaded letters in which word "oyster" was printed, that each letter in latter word was approximately two thirds of the size of the entire word "mussel" : and (b) Set forth upon the labels of the bags of three of the four brands sold by It, the words "Biloxi, Miss.", in addition to its own Inland address, notwithstanding fact it maintained no office or place of business ln Biloxi, known to trade and poultry raisers as one of the principal shipping points for crushed oyster shell;
With result of leading purchasers and prospective purchasers to belleve that said bags of Its product contained the more costly and preferred crushed oyster shell exclusively, and of confusing, misleading, and deceiving a substantial portion of the trade and purchasers In said respect, and with capacity and tendency so to do, and to Induce purchase and use of Its said products by the purchasing public because of such erroneous belief, and divert trade to It from competitors who sell crushed oyster shell and from those who sell mussel shell, truthfully branded, to their injury: Held, Thllt such acts and practices, under the conditions and circumstances set forth, were to the prejudice of the public and competitors and constituted unfair methods of competition, Before Mr. John W. Addison, trial examiner. Mr. Edw. W. Thomerson for the Commission SYNOPSIS oF Co11PLAINT Reciting its action in the public interest, pursuant to the pro. visions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Commission charged respondent Iowa corporation, engaged in buying and crush· ing mussel and oyster shell, and in selling such crushed shell for use in supplying calcium carbonate in feeding chickens, and with prin· cipal place of business in Muscatine, Iowa, with misbranding or mislabeling as to composition of product, in violation of the pro~ !' Findings 21 F. T. C. visions of Section 5 of such Act, prohibiting the use of unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce. Respondent, as charged, engaged as aforesaid, sells its said prod· uct as oyster shell through conspicuously featuring the word "oy:;tcr" upon the labels of the containers thereof, with inadequate and inconspicuous display of word "mussel", and through display of words "Biloxi, Miss.", as one of its addresses, notwithstanding fact proportion of oyster shell in its four brands ranges from 50 per cent to 5 per cent only, and it has no office or place of business ih Biloxi, well known to trade and crushed oyster shell purchasers as one of the principal shipping points for said product,l The acts and practices of respondent, as chaJ·ged, in thus branding and representing its product "are false, misleading, and deceptive and have the tendency and capacity to and do confuse, mislead, and deceive a substantial part of the trade and purchasing public into the erroneous belief that its said crushed mussel shell, to which has been added crushed oyster shell in the proportions set out, is crushed oyster shell, and such acts and practices of respondent in branding) advertising and representing its products are false, misleading and deceptive and have the tendency and capacity to induce the purchasing public to buy and use respondent's said products because of the erroneous belief that such products are crushed oyster shell and to divert trade to respondent from competitors, similarly engaged in the sale of products used for the same general purpose", and "who do not so brand, advertise, and represent their products", to the injury and prejudice of the public and competitors. Upon the foregoing complaint, the Commission made the following REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes'', the Federal Trade Commission, on the loth day of December 1934 issu(:'d, and immediately thereafter served, a complaint charging the American Shell Products Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, with the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act. The respondent having filed its answer herein, hearings were had and evidence was thereupon introduced at the instance of the Com· mission and respondent before an examiner of the Federal Trade Commission, theretofore duly appointed.
• The labels used In the tour brands and dPscrlptlon thereof, as alleged in the complnlnt, are set torth in the findings, 4nfra.
AMERICAN SHELL PRODUCTS CO. 239 237 Findings Thereupon, this proceeding came on for final hearing on a brief filed by counsel on behalf of the Commission, no appearance being made or brief filed on behalf of the respondent, and the Commission having duly considered the record and being fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes this its findings as to the facts and conclusion drawn therefrom.
FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. The respondent, American Shell Products Company, is a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Iowa, with its principal office and place of business in the city of Muscatine, in said State. PAR. 2. The respondent is now engaged, and has been for the several years last past, in the business of buying and crushing mussel and oyster shell and in the selling of such crushed shell to wholesale and retail dealers located in the various States of the United States, for ultimate resale to members of the purchasing public for use in feeding chickens. Respondent produces and sells approximately 2,000 tons of crushed shell per year.. Respondent causes such crushed shell, when sold, to be transported from its principal place of business at Muscatine, Iowa, or from the State where said shipment originated, to, into and across the several States of the United States other than the State of Iowa, or the States wherein such shipment originated, to the several purchasers thereof. Other corporations, and persons, firms and associations have been and are engaged in producing and offering for sale and selling in said commerce &among the several States of the United States crushed mussel shell and crushed oyster shell and other competitive products and respondent, in the course and conduct of its business, is in substantial competition with such other corporations and persons, firms and associations. PAR. 3. Crushed mussel shell, crushed oyster shell, and crushed limestone are used throughout the several States of the United States as a food fot laying hens to increase the calcium carbonate content of the diet, because of the fact that such increase of calcium carbonate results in the formation of more and better egg shells. Crushed oyster shell is well known in the trade and among poultry raisers as a desirable addition to the diet of laying hens and many dealers in and purchasers of such products prefer crushed oyster shell to crushed mussel shell or crushed limestone and believe that it is superior to either crushed mussel shell or crushed limestone, for the purpose for which it is used. Crushed mussel shell has been used for this purpose for a number of years, but is not as well and favol'- 113G~3m--3s--vo1.21----1B Findings 21F.T.0.
ably known in the trade and among poultry raisers as is crushed oyster shell. Crushed oyster shell is made by grinding and crushing either shell taken from edible oysters or shell taken from reefs in the Gulf of Mexico. Crushed mussel shell is made by grinding and crushing shell of fresh water mussel taken from the Mississippi, its tributaries, and other fresh waters in the United States. Crushed oyster shell sells at a higher price than does crushed mussel shell. Ultimate purchasers of crushed shell are unable to determine from an examination of the shell whether it is mussel or oyster shell or whether it is mixed shell, and are dependent upon the printed matter found on the containers in which such shell is sold as to the contents thereof. Crushed shell, whether it be oyster, mussel, or a mixture of oyster and mussel shell, finds a better sale when branded "oyster" than it does when branded "mussel", or branded "mixed oyster and mussel".
The city of Biloxi, Miss., is known in the trade and to poultry raisers ns one of the principal shipping points in the United States for crushed oyster shell.
PAR. 4. Respondent's product is sold to wholesalers, retailers and the ultimate purchasers in burlap bags, which contain approximately 100 pounds of crushed shell and upon which appears the printed matter hereinafter set out.
Respondent produces and sells a mixed crushed shell, which is approximately 50 percent mussel and 50 percent oyster shell, under the trade name "Premium", and the respondent causes to be printed on the bags in which this brand of crushed shell is sold the following words, letters, and figures:
100 Lns. NET WHEN PACKED PREMIUM BRAND MUSSEL (Drawing of a hen sitting on eggs) OYSTER ANALYSIS S!llcla ( SIO') 1. 05% Oxides iron (FO'O') 1.84% Calcium carbonate (lime C.A.C.0.3) 98.00% Carbonate magnesium 1.10% PURE KILN DRIED TRIPLE SCREENED SHELL AMERICAN SHELL PRODUCTS CO.
Biloxi, Miss. Muscatine, Iowa. N eahr-Bags-Chicago Respondent produces and sells a. mixed crushed shell, which is approximately 75 percent mussel and 25 percent oyster shell, under AMERICAN SHELL PRODUCTS CO, 241 237 Findings the trade name ''Standard", and the respondent causes to be printed on the bags in which this brand of crushed ::.hell is sold the following words, letters, and figures:
100 LBS. NET \VHEN PACKED STANDARD BRAND Mussel (Large drawing of two chickens) OYSTER ANALYSIS Sil1cla ( Slo') 1.2% Oxides iron (FO'O') . 9% Calcium carbonate (lime C.A.C.O.') 97.46% Carbonate magnesium 1.10% PURE KILN DRIED TRIPLE SCREENED SHELL ?.Itg. for AMERICAN FEED PRODUCTS CO.
Blloxl, Miss. Muscatine, Ia. N eahr-Bags-Chicago Respondent produces and sells a mixed crushed shell, which is approximately 95 percent mussel and 5 percent oyster shell, under the trade name "Egg Producer", and the respondent causes to be printed on the bags in which this brand of crushed shell is sold the following words, letters, and figures:
100 Lns. NET WHEN PACKED EGG PRODUCER BRAND Mussel (Large drawing of two chickens) OYSTER ANALYSIS Sillcia ( Slo') 1. 05% Oxides iron (FO'O') 1. 34o/o Calcium carbonate (lime C.A.C.0.3) 96. 51 o/o Carbonate magnesium 1.10o/o PURE KILN DRIED TRIPLE SCREENED SHELL Mfg. for CRUSHED SHELL CO.
Blloxl, Miss. Muscatine, Ia. Respondent produces and sells a mixed crushed shell, which is approximately 95 percent mussel and 5 percent oyster shell, under Findings 21 F. T.C~ the trade name "Very Best", which is made exclusively for the- "Witwer Grocery Company, an Iowa corporation, with its principal office at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and the respondent causes to be printed on the bags in which this brand of crushed shell is sold, the following words, letters, and figures:
100 LBS. NET WHEN PACKED VERY BEST BRAND (Large drawing of two chickens) OYSTER ANALYSIS Silica ( Slo') 1.2% Oxides iron (FO'O') .9% Calcium carbonate (lime C.A.C.O.') 97.46% Mussel Manufact.ured for and sold exclusively by WITWER GROCERY COMPANY Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Davenport, Iowa. Mason City, Iowa. Iowa Falls, Iowa. On the bags in which brands "Premium", "Standard", "Egg Producer", and "Very Best" are sold, the word "oyster" is printed in large shaded letters in a conspicuous place and the word "mussel" is printed in small plain letters in an obscure place. Each letter used in the word "oyster" is approximately two-thirds the size of the entire word "mussel". Respondent does not maintain an office or place of business in the city of Biloxi, l\Iiss. The effect as a whole 0f the printed matter on said bags and the use of the address Biloxi, Miss.1 on the three brands on which it is used, is to lead purchasers and prospective purchasers to believe that said bags contain crushed oyster shell and not a mixture of crushed mussel and oyster shell. PAR. 5. Respondent's acts and practices in branding and representing its product in the manner as hereinabove set forth are misleading and deceptive and have the tendency and capacity to and do confuse, mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the trade and purchasers of such products into the erroneous belief that its crushed mussel shell, to which has been added crushed oyster shell in the proportions as above stated, is crushed oyster shell and has the tendency and capacity to induce the purchasing public to buy and use respondent's products because of said erroneous belief that such products are crushed oyster shell and to divert trade to the respondent from competitors who sell crushed oyster shell and from competitors who sell crushed mussel shell and brand it truthfully, to their injury.
Al\IERICAN SHELL PRODUCTS CO. 243 237 Order CONCLUSION The acts and practices of the respondent, American Shell Prod· ucts Company, under the conditions and circumstances described in the foregoing findings, are to the prejudice of the public and respond· ent's competitors and are unfair methods of competition in com· :rnerce and constitute a violation of the Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Com· mission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes". ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commis· sion upon the record and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that the respondent American Shell Products Company, a corporation, has violated the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes"- / t is now ordered, That the respondent American Shell Products Company, a corporation, its officers, agents, representatives, servants, and employees, when offering for sale and selling crushed shell in commerce among the several States of the United States, cease and desist from directly or indirectly:
(1) Using the word "oyster" on bags or containers in which it sells crushed shell or otherwise to represent, describe, or desig. nate crushed shell (a) unless and until such crushed shell is com. posed entirely of the crushed shell of the bivalve commonly known as the oyster, or (b) unless and until, where such crushed shell is composed partly of oyster shell, the word "oyster" is accompanied by a word or words, in equally conspicuous form and color, aptly and truthfully describing the other material or materials of which such product is composed. (2) Using an address on bags or containers in which it sells crushed shell or otherwise in connection with the sale or offers of sale of crushed shell, unless and until the respondent main. tains an office or place of business at such address. It is further ordered, That the respondent American Shell Prod· ucts Company, a corporation, shall, within 60 days after service upon it of a copy of this order, file with the Federal Trade Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the order to cease and desist hereinabove set forth.
Complaint 21 F. T.C.