Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Old Hickory Mills

Volume 19 · 19 F.T.C. 187

Citation
19 F.T.C. 187
Docket
1607
Complaint
1929-09-06
Decision
1934-08-06
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
flour milling
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Respondent counsel
Thomas H. Malone, of Nashville, Tenn
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Cite this decision

Old Hickory Mills, 19 F.T.C. 187 (1934). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v019-0024

Report an error in this record (decision id v019-0024)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF OLD HICKORY MILLS ET AL.

COMPLAINT AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. ll OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Doclcct 1607. Complaint, Sept. 6, 1929'-order, Aug. 6, 193~ Consent order requiring respondent Old Hickory Mills, its officers, etc., iu connection with the sale of flour in commerce among the several States, to cease and desist from carrying on such business under the name " Old Hickory Mills" or under any other name including the word " Mills" or any other word or words of like import, and from representing through advertisements, circulars, etc., or in any other manner designed to promote or affect interstate commerce, that it is a manufacturer of flour or that the flour sold by it comes direct from manufacturer to purchaser, unless and until it actually " owns and operates or directly and absolutely controls a factory or mill wherein is made by grinding or crushing the wheat berry any and all flour sold or offered for sale by it under such title or name, or by or through any such representations; unless and until respondent shall insert and use also the words' Not Grinders of Wheat' in immediate conjunction with its title, corporate name, trade name, or other designation in letters equally legible and conspicuous when said title, corporate name, trade name, or other designation is used on stationery, letterheads, bags, containers, advertising matter or otherwise." Mr. Edward L. Smith and Mr. John lV. Hilldrop for the Commission.

Mr. Thomas H. Malone, of Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Complaint 1 Acting in the public interest pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to Create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes", the Federal Trade Commission charges that the Old Hickory Mills, a corporation, J. Frank Foster, individually and as president, James Willis, individually and as vice president, R. ,V. Condon, individually and as vice president, and D. L. Anderson, individually and as secretary-treasurer, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have been and are using unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce in violation of the provisions of Section 5· of said Act, and states its charges in that respect as :follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, Old Hickory Mills, is a corporation or'ganized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Tennessee. The respondents, J. Frank Foster, James 1 AIIlended.

Complaint 19F. T. C.

Willis, R. W. Condon, and D. L. Anderson are respectively, president, vice presidents, and secretary-treasurer of said corporation. Respondent corporation has its place of business at 410 Twenty-third Avenue, North, in the city of Nashville, State of Tennessee, which is also the location of the office and plant of the Mero Mills which is engaged in the business of blending and mixing flours and selling the same to the public in both self-rising and plain form. Respondents, J. Frank Foster, James \Villis, R. \V. Condon, and D. L. Anderson, manage, control, and direct the business and affairs of respondent Old Hickory Mills.

PAR. 2. The respondent corporation, Old Hickory Mills, is engaged in the business of selling flour, principally to retail grocers located throughout the southeastern States of the United States, which flour it purchases from the Mero Mills, which packs the same on orders received by it from the respondent corporation. The business of respondent amounts to approximately 20,000 barrels of flour per year, the orders for which are solicited principally through the mail. Respondent corporation also conducts and operates its business under the trade names of Lion Milling Company and Maple Leaf Milling Company at the same address; namely, 410 Twenty-third Avenue, North, Nashville, Tenn. On the letterheads used in the business done by respondent corporation under the trade names aforesaid, beparate post office addresses are given; to wit, Lion Milling Company, P. 0. Box 118, and Maple Leaf Milling Company, P. 0. Box 234, Nashville, Tenn.

PAR. 3. Respondent corporation solicits orders for flour purchased, prepared, and sold to it by the Mero Mills, as above described, in States other than the State of Tennessee, and contracts to sell and deliver and does sell and cause to be transported to purchasers outside the State of Tennessee, said flour. Respondent corporation is in <'Ompetition with individuals, partnerships and corporations likewise engaged in the business of selling flour in interstate commerce. PAR. 4. Respondent corporation, in the conduct of its business as aforesaid, sells the flour purchased by it as above described under from two to six brands under each of the three names; namely, Old Hickory Mills, Lion Milling Company, and Maple Leaf Milling Company. The letterheads used in its business correspondence are as follows:

OLD IIICKORY MILLS Manufacturers of Pure Soft Wheat Flour OLD HICKORY MILLS ET AL. 189 187 Complaint MAPLE LEAF MILLING COMPANY Box 234 Nashville, Tennessee LION MILLING COMPANY Box 118 Nashville, Tennessee The flour packed for respondent and sold by it as aforesaid is delivered in cotton or other sacks on which respondent causes to be stamped in conspicuous letters the name or symbols of the particular brand and also the words," From Old Hickory Mills, Nashville, Tennessee", or" From Maple Leaf Milling Company, Nashville, Tennessee", or "From Lion Milling Company, Nashville, Tennessee", and such words as: " Best Plain Patented " or " Self-Rising Flour." In the course of its said business respondent corporation sends out circulars and other literature which contain other representations in words or symbols tending to lead customers and prospective purchasers of the flour which it sells to believe that it manufactures said flour, whereas respondent corporation owns no plant or machinery for the grinding of wheat into flour.

P .AR. 5. The use by respondent corporation o£ the name, Old Hickory Mills and the trade names Lion Milling Company and Maple Lea£ Milling Company, and the representations in its correspondence and otherwise, as aforesaid, have the capacity and tendency to lead dealers and prospective purchasers o£ flour to believe that in purchasing its products they are buying flour direct from a miller or manufacturer of flour-that is, one that makes the flour it sells by rolling or grinding or other process of crushing wheat and extracting therefrom the product known as flour, and without the intervention o£ a middleman or any element o£ cost of a middleman's profit, and induce purchases of its flour by dealers and consumers on that understanding and belief; and said representations constitute unfair methods o£ competition with millers or manufacturers of flour likewise engaged in interstate commerce, and with sellers of flour likewise engaged in interstate commerce who do not manufacture the flour they sell but buy and sell flour made by others and do not represent themselves to be millers or manufacturers of flour, to the injury of said millers and sellers of flour in that said representations of respondents are false and misleading and tend to take away their business.

'Wherefore, the said acts and practices of respondents are all to the · prejudice of the public and constitute unfair methods of competition Order 19F.T.C.

in commerce within the intent and meaning of Section 5 of an Act of Congress entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to defin~ its powers and duties, and for other purposes", approved September 26, 1914.

ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Old Hickory Mills, a corporation, one of the respondents in this proceeding, by its attorney, Thomas H. Malone, Esq., having filed with this Commission its motion that it be permitted to withdraw its answer to the amended complaint herein and be permitted to waive hearing on the charges set forth in the complaint herein and not contest the proceedings, and the said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, in and by its said motion relying on paragraph 2 of Rule III of the Commission's Rules of Practice, having consented that as therein provided, the Commission may make, enter and serve upon said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, an order to cease and desist from the methods of competition alleged in the said complaint; and the Commission having duly considered the same and being fully advised in the premises- Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, That the said motion be and the same is hereby granted and that the said respondent, Old Hickory Mills be and it is hereby permitted to withdraw its answer to the amended complaint herein, and that it be and is hereby permitted to waive hearing on the charges set forth in the said complaint; And it ia hereby fwrther ordered, That the said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees forthwith cease and desist from carrying on the business of selling flour in commerce among the several States of the United States under the name Old Hickory Mills or under any other name which includes the word " mills " or any other word or words of like import, and from making representations through advertisements, circulars, correspondence, stationery, or in any other manner whatsoever designed to promote or otherwise affect interstate commerce, that it is a manufacturer of flour or that the flour sold by it comes direct from manufacturer to purchaser, unless and until said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, using such word or words or making such representations actually owns and operates or directly and absolutely controls a factory or mill wherein is made by grinding or crushing the wheat berry any and all flour sold or offered for sale by it under such title or name, or by or through any such representations; unless and until respondent shall insert and use also the words "Not Grinders of 'Wheat" in 5mmediate conjunction with OLD HICKORY MILLS ET AL. 191 187 Order its title, corporate name, trade name, or other designation in letters equally legible and conspicuous when sa.id title, corporate name, trade name, or other designation is used on stationery, letterheads, bags, containers, advertising matter or otherwise. It is hereby further ordered, That the said respondent within 60 days from the date of service upon it of this order file with this Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner in which this order has been complied with and conformed to. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO RESPONDENT INDIVIDUALS This Commission having been informed that J. Frank Foster, James 'Willis, R. vV. Condon, and D. L. Anderson made respondents in this proceeding as individuals and as officers of the respondent, Old Hickory Mills, a corporation, are no longer connected with the said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, and the Commission this day having entered, issued, and served upon said respondent, Old Hickory Mills, an order to cease and desist from the methods of competition alleged in the complaint; and the Commission having duly considered the same and being fully advised in the premises- Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, For the reasons hereinabove mentioned, that the complaint in this proceeding as to the aforesaid J. Frank Foster, James vVillis, R. W. Condon, and D. L. Anderson be and the same is hereby dismissed.

4772"--36--vol19----14 Complaint 19F.T.C.

← 19 F.T.C. 183 · 19 F.T.C. 192 →