Cut Arid Wire Tack Industry
16 CFR Part 50 · Trade practice rules · in the Code of Federal Regulations 1974-1974 (1 annual editions)
Scanned CFR pages, OCR text may contain errors; the linked Library of Congress PDF is the authority. Not legal advice; not affiliated with the FTC. These rules and guides are historical: most were rescinded or replaced, so do not assume any is in force.
Latest edition: Library of Congress, 1974 CFR · Earliest edition: 1974 CFR
Text (1974 edition, OCR)
Chapter I—Federal Trade competitors in their businesses, is an un- fair trade practice. § 49.11 Misrepresenting character of business. To represent in advertisements or otherwise that a concern is a manufac- turer and owner or operator of a mill or producing company making an article of commerce, when in fact such concern does not own, operate, or possess such @ mill or producing company mnaufactur- ing such article, with the effect of mis- leading or deceiving purchasers, is an unfair trade practice. Group IL § 49.101 Unauthorized use of designs, ete. The practice of usurping designs, styles, or patterns originated by a com- petitor and appropriating them for one’s own use within 1 year after such origination, is condemned by the indus- try. § 49.102 Arhitration. The industry approves the practice of handling disputes in a fair and reason- able manner, coupled with a spirit of moderation and good will, and every ef- fort should be made by the disputants thernselves to arrive at an agreement. If unable to do so they should agree, if possible, upon arbitration under some one of the prevailing codes. COMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES § 49.201 Industry committee. The provisions of § 16.1 of this sub- chapter shall be applicable to an industry committee established under this part. [21 F-R. 1174, Feb. 21, 1956] PART 50—CUT AND WIRE TACK INDUSTRY Sec. 50.0 The industry and its products. 50.1 Misrepresentation (general). 50.2 Misrepresentation as to character of business. 50.3. Misrepresenting products as conform- ing to standard. 50.4 Deception as to origin. 50.5 Guarantees, warranties, etc. 50.6 Substitution of products. 50.7 Deceptive use or imitation or simu- lation of trade or corporate names, trade-marks, etc. 50.8 Deceptive invoicing, etc. 50.9 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. 50.10 Inducing breach of contract. Commission § 50.2 Sec. 50.11 Enticing away employees of competi- tors. Commercial bribery. Procurement of competitors’ confiden- tial information. Coercing purchase of one product as @ prerequisite to the purchase of other products. Exclusive deals. Consignment distribution. Prohibited sales below cost. Prohibited forms of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.) Prohibited discrimination. Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. AutTHoRITY: The provisions of this Part 50 issued under secs. 6, 5, 38 State. 721, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Source: The provisions of this Part 50 appear at 23 F.R. 5630, July 25, 1958, unless otherwise noted. §50.0 The industry and its preducts. (a) Products of the industry as cov- ered by the rules m this part consist of cut tacks and wire tacks. (Thumb tacks are not included.) (b) Members of the industry are per- sons, firms, corporations, and organiza- tions engaged in the manufacture, im- portation, sale, offering for sale, or dis- tribution of such products. § 50.1 Misrepresentation (general). It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to make or publish, or cause to be made or pub- lished, by way of advertising, labeling, or otherwise, any statement or representa- tion which, directly or by implication, has the capacity and tendency or effect of deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the manufacture or dis- tribution of any industry product, or as to the grade, quality, quantity, weight, count per pound, composition, condition, use, size, material, finish, holdmg power, strength, origin, design, durability, per- formance, or immunity from or resist- ance to rust, of any such product, or which has the capacity and tendency or effect of deceiving purchasers or pro- spective purchasers in any other ma- terial respect. § 50.2 Misrepresentation as to character of business. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, in the course of or in connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of industry 50.12 50.13 50.14 50.15 50.16 50.17 50.18 50.19 50.20 403 § 50.3 products, to misrepresent the character, extent, volume, or type of his business. § 50.3 Misrepresenting products as cou- forming to standard. In connection with the sale or offering for sale of industry products, it is an.un- fair trade practice to represent, through advertising or otherwise, that such prod- ucts conform to any standards recog- nized in or applicable to the industry when such is not the fact. § 50.4 Deception as to origin. (a) It is an unfair trade practice to sell or offer for sale industry products under any representation which has the capacity and tendency or effect of de- ceiving purchasers or prospective pur- chasers as to the place of manufacture thereof. (b) It is an unfair trade practice to sell or offer for sale industry products of foreign manufacture without adequate and nondeceptive disclosure of the fact that such products were manufactured in an identified foreign country, when the failure to make such disclosure has the capacity and tendency or effect of de- ceiving purchasers or prospective pur- chasers of such products. Such disclo- sure of foreign origin, as when required under this section, shall be in the form of a legible marking, stamping, or label- ing on the outside of the containers in which the products are sold or offered for sale, and shail be of such size, con- spicuousness, and degree of permanency,. as to be and remain noticeable and read- able upon casual inspection during the marketing of the products and until con- summation of their sale for use, § 50.5 Guarantees, warranties, etc. (a) In the sale, offering for sale, or dis- tribution of industry products, it is an unfair trade practice for any industry member: (1) To represent that any industry product is guaranteed unless, in close conjunction with such representation, the identity of the guarantor, the extent and nature of the guarantee, and any material conditions or limitations reiat- ing to the liability of the guarantor under the guarantee, are adequately and non- deceptively disclosed; or (2) To offer or use any guarantee re- specting an industry product under which the guarantor fails to observe his obligations; or Title 16—Commercial Practices (3) To offer or use any guarantee which is otherwise deceptive or unfair. (b) This section shall be applicable. not only to guarantees but also to war- rantles, to purported guarantees and warrantles, and to any promise or rep- resentation in the nature of a guarantee: or warranty. §50.6 Substitution of products. It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry to make an un- authorized substitution of products, where such substitution has the capacity: and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers, by: (a) Shipping or delivering industry products which do not conform to samples submitted, to specifications (in bids or otherwise) upon which the sale is consummated, or to representations. made prior to securing the order, without advising the purchaser of the substitu- tion and obtaining his consent thereto prior to making shipment or delivery; or (b) Falseiy representing the reason: for making a substitution. § 50.7 Deceptive use or imitation or simulation of trade or corporate names, trade-marks, ete. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry: (a) To imitate or simulate the trade- marks, trade names, brands, or labels of competitors, with the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or de- ceiving purchasers or prospective pur- chasers; or . (b) To use any trade name, corporate name, trade-mark, or other trade desig- nation, which has the capaclty and tend-. ency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the name, nature, or origin of any product of the industry, or of any ma- terial used therein, or which is false, de- ceptive, or misleading in any other ma- terial respect. § 50.8 Deceptive invoicing, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to issue invoices, billings, or sales slips which by reason of misstatements therein or omissions therefrom have the capacity and tend- ency or effect of deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers in any material respect. 404 Chapter |—Federal Trade Commission $50.9 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their prod- ucts. The defamation of competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false dis- paragement of the products of competi- tors in any respect, or of their business methods, selling prices, values, credit terms, policies, or services, is an unfair ‘trade practice, § 50.10 Inducing breach of contract. (a) Knowingly inducing or attempt- ing to induce the breach of existing law- ful contracts between competitors and their customers or their suppliers, or in- terfering with or obstructing the per- formance of any such contractual duties or services, under any circumstance hav- ing the capacity and tendency or effect of substantially injuring or lessening pres- ent or potential competition, is an unfair trade practice. (b) Nothing in this section is intended to imply that it is improper for an indus- try member to solicit the business of a customer of a competing industry mem- ber; nor is the section to be construed as in anywise authorizing any agreement, understanding, or planned common course of action by two or more industry members not to solicit business from the customers of either of them, or from customers of any other industry member. § 50.11 Enticing away employees of competitors. It is an unfair trade practice willfully to entice away employees or saies repre- sentatives of competitors with the intent and effect of thereby unduly hampering or injuring competitors in their business and destroying or substantially lessening competition: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as prohib- iting employees from seeking more favorable employment, or as prohibitmg employers from hiring or offering em- ployment to employees of competitors in good faith and not for the purpose of injuring, destroying, or preventing com- petition. § 50.12 Commercial bribery. It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or in- directiy, to give, or offer to give, or per- mit or cause to be given, money or any- § 50.16 thing of value to agents, employees or representatives of customers or pro- spective customers, or to agents, em- ployees or representatives of competi- tors’ customers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or principals, as an inducement to influ- ence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase prod- ucts manufactured or sold by such in- dustry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from deal- ing or contracting to deal with com- petitors. § 50.13 Procurement of competitors’ confidential information. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to obtain mfor- mation concerning the business of a competitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or mis- leading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority, or by any other unfair means, and to use the information so obtained so as to in- jure said competitor in his business or to suppress competition or unreasonably restrain trade. § 50.14 Coercing purchase of one prod- uct as a prerequisite to the purchase of other products. The practice of coercing the purchase of one or more products as a prerequisite to the purchase of one or more other products, where the effect may be sub- stantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or unreasonably to re- strain trade, is an unfair trade practice. § 50.15 Exclusive deals. It is an imfair trade practice for any member of the industry to contract to sell or sell any industry product, or to fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condi- tion, agreement, or understanding that the purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 50.16 Consignment distribution. (a) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ 405 § 50.17 the practice of shipping industry prod- ucts on consignment without the express request of prior consent of the pur- chasers. (b) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ the practice of shipping industry prod- ucts on consignment or pretended con- signment for the purpose and with the effect of artificially clogging or closing trade outlets and unduly restricting competitors’ use of said trade outlets in getting their products to purchasers through regular channels of distribution, thereby injuring, destroying, or prevent- ing competition or tending to create a monopoly or unreasonably to restrain trade. (ec) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any understand- ing or agreement, combination or con- spiracy, or planned common course of action, by and between industry nem- bers, mutually to conform or restrict their practice of shipping goods on con- signment with the intent or effect of lessening competition. § 50.17 Prohibited sales below cost. (a) The practice of selling products of the industry at a price less than the cost thereof to the seller, with the purpose or intent, and where the effect is, or where there is a reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifie competition or tend to create a monopoly, is an unfair trade practice. (b) This section is not to be construed as prohibiting all sales below cost, but only such selling below the seller’s cost as is resorted to and pursued with the wrongful intent or purpose referred to and where the effect is, or where there is reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or to create a mo- nopoly. Among the situations in which the requisite purpose or intent would ordinarily be lacking are cases in which such sales were: (1) Made under judi- cial process; or (2) mnade in bona fide discontinuance of business in the goods concerned. (c) As used in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section the term “cost” means the respective seller’s cost and not an average cost in the industry whether such average cost be determined by an industry cost survey or some other method. It consists of the total outlay or expenditure by the seller in the acqui- Title 16—Commercial Practices sition, production, and distribution of the products involved, and comprises all elements of cost such as labor, material, depreciation, taxes (except taxes on net income and such other taxes as are not properly applicable to cost), and general overhead expenses, incurred by the seller in the acquisition, manufacture, proc- essing, preparation for marketing, sale, and delivery of the products. Not to be included are dividends or interest on borrowed or invested capital, or nonop- erating losses, such as fire losses and losses from the sale or exchange of cap- ital assets. Operating cost should not be reduced by items of nonoperating in- come, such as income from investments, and gain on the sale of capital assets. (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed ag relieving an industry mem- ber from compliance with any of the re- quirements of the Robinson-Patman Act. § 50.18 Prohibited forms of trade re- ; ave (unlawful price fixing, etc.). It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, either directly or indirectly, to engage in any planned com- mon course of action, or to enter into or take part in any understanding, agree- ment, combination, or conspiracy, with one or more members of the industry, or with any other person or persons, to fix or maintain the price of any goods or other- wise unlawfully to restrain trade; or to use any form of threat, intimidation, or 1The inhibitions of tbis section are sub- ject to Public Law 542, approved July 14, 1952, 66 Stat. 632 (the McGuire Act) which provides that with respect to a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which. bears, the trademark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such com- modity and which is in free and open com- petition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, a seller of such a commodity may enter into a contract or agreement with a buyer thereof which establishes a minimum or stipulated price at which such commodity may be resold by such buyer when such con- tract or agreement is lawful as applied to intrastate transactions under the laws of the State, Territory, or territorial jurisdiction in which the resale is to be made or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale, and when such contract or agreement ‘is not between manufacturers, or between wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between per- sons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other. 406 Chapter I—Federal Trade Commission coercion to induce any member of the industry or other person or persons to engage in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. § 50.19 Prohibited discrimination? (a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, credits, etc., which effect unlawful price discrimina- tion: It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to grant or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, effects a discrimina- tion in price between different pur- chasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases in- volved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be sub- stantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of com- merce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: Provided, however: (1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, con- sumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public lbraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable in- stitutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use; (2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shail prevent differentiais which make only due allowance for dif- ferences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such 2As used in this section, the word “com- merce” means “trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the Dis- trict of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Terri- tory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States.” § 50.19 commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered; Nore: Cost justification under paragraph (a) of this section depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transactions under the terms of subpara- graph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a singie delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by muitipie orders or for multiple deliveries. (3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own cus- tomers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade; . (4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in re- sponse to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not lim- ited to distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned; (5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a competitor. Nore: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (f) of this section. graph (£) (b) The following are examples of price differential practices to be con- sidered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when in- volving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the juris- diction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when: (1) The commerce requirements spec- ified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and (2) The price differentlal has a rea- sonable probability of substantially less- ening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying, or preventing competition with the industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit 407 $ 50.19 of the price differential, or with cus- tomers of either of them; and (3) The price differential is not justi- fied by cost savings (see subparagraph (2) of paragraph (a) of this section); and (4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions af- fecting the market for or the market- ability of the goods concerned (see sub- paragraph (4) of paragraph (a) of this section); and (5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see subparagraph (5) of paragraph (a) of this section). Example No. 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a dis- count to a customer equivalent to a fixed percentage of the total of the customer’s purchases during such period and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like conditions. . Example No. 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other customers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is ac- complished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quallty of the products sold. Example No. 3. An industry member in- voices goods to all his customers at the same price but supplies additional quantities of such goods at no extra charge to one or more, but not to all, such customers; or supplies other goods or premiums to one or more, but not to all, such customers for which he makes no extra charge and which effects an actual price difference in favor of certain of his customers. Example No. 4. Terms of 2/10th prox. are granted by an industry member to some customers on goods purchased by them from the industry member. Another customer or customers are, nevertheless, allowed to take a 5 percent instead of a 2 percent discount when making payment to the industry mem- ber within the time prescribed. Note: As previously indicated, the fore- going are examples of practices to be con- sidered violative of the prohibitions of para- graph (a) of this section when involving goods of Hke grade and quality and when not subject to the other exemptions, exclu- sions, or defenses set forth in this paragraph. (c) Prohibited brokerage and com- missions: It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to pay or grant, or to recelve or accept, anything of value as a commis- sion, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of Title 16—Commercial Practices goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other in- termediary therein where such interme- diary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect con- trol, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid. (d) Prohibited advertising or promo- tional allowances, etc: It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or faclli- ties furnished by or through such cus- tomer in connection with the processing, handiing, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufac- tured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or con- sideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers com- peting in the distribution of such prod- ucts or commodities. Note 1: Industry members giving adver- tising allowances to competing customers must exercise precaution and diligence in seeing that all of such allowances are used in accordance with the terms of their offers. Nore 2: When an industry member gives allowances to competing customers for ad- vertising in a newspaper or periodical, the fact that a lower advertising rate for equiv- alent space is available to one or more, but not all, such customers, is not to be regarded by the industry member as warranting the retention by such customer or customers of any portion of the allowance for his or their personal use or benefit. (e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities: It is an unfair trade prac- tice for any member of the industry en- gaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without proc- essing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such com- modity so purchased upon terms not ac- corded to alli competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms. Note: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Ciayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (f) of this section, 408 Chapter I—Federal Trade Commission (f) Inducting or receiving an illegal discrimination in price: It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the fore- going provisions of this section. Nore: Paragraph (f) of this section is a restatement of section 2 (f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding under this section in order to make out @ prima facte violation, the Commission must show that the favored huyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2 (a) of said act and not justified under subpara- graph (2), (4), or (5) of paragraph (a) of this section. When, in any such proceedings, the issue is limited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences !n cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Com- mission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, including: (1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and delivered to him by the selier were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or (2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantites in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the compet- ing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and character specified as to justify the price differential. Nore: Section 50.19 1s based on the provi- sions of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act. Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which reads as follows, is In amplification of the note to subparagraph (5) of paragraph (a) of this section and of the note to paragraph (e) of this section: “Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complain under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services of facilities furnished, the burden of rebut- ting the prima facie case thus made by show- ing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and uniess justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein con- tained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers § 51.0 was made in good falth to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.” § 50.20 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. - It is an unfair trade practice for any Person, firm, or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, directly, or indirectly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice specified in this part. PART 51—FLUOROCARBONS INDUSTRY Sec. 51.0 Definitions. 51.1 Misrepresentation and deception in general. 51.22 Misrepresentation as to character of business. 51.3 Misrepresenting products as conform- ing to standard. 514 Misuse of terms “close-outs,” “dis- continued lines,” “special bargains,” etc. 51.5 Substitution of products. 51.6 Deceptive use of trade or corporate names, trade-marks, etc. 51.7 False invoicing. 51.8 Fictitious prices, price lists, etc. 51.9 Guarantees, warranties, etc. 51.10 Prohibited form of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.). 51.11 Prohibited sales below cost. 51.12 Prohibited discrimination. 51.13 Lifting of stocks, 51.14 Consignment distribution. 51.18 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. 51.16 Procurement of competitors’ confiden- tial information by unfair means and wrongful use thereof. 51.17 Enticing away employees of com- petitors. 51.18 Exclusive deals. 51.19 Commercial bribery. 51.20 Unlawful interference with competi- tors’ purchases or sales. 51.21 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. AUTHORITY: The provisions of this Part 51 issued under secs. 6, 5, 38 Stat. 721, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Sovugces: The provisions of this Part 51 ap- pear at 26 F.R. 184, Jan. 11, 1961, unless otherwise noted. , § 51.0 Definitions. As used in this part the terms “in- dustry member” and “industry products” shall have the following meaning: (a) Industry member. Any person, firm, corporation or organization en- gaged in the manufacture, fabrication, 409 20-058—-74——-27