Melamine Dinnerware Industrty
16 CFR Part 32 · Trade practice rules · in the Code of Federal Regulations 1975-1975 (1 annual editions)
Scanned CFR pages, OCR text may contain errors; the linked Library of Congress PDF is the authority. Not legal advice; not affiliated with the FTC. These rules and guides are historical: most were rescinded or replaced, so do not assume any is in force.
Latest edition: Library of Congress, 1975 CFR · Earliest edition: 1975 CFR
Text (1975 edition, OCR)
§ 31.7 § 31.7 Sales below eost. The selling of goods below cost with the intent and with the effect of injuring & competitor and where the effect may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or to unrea- sonably restrain trade is an unfair trade practice. § 31.8 Commercial bribery. Directly or indirectly to give or permit to be given or offer to give money or any- thing of value to agents, employees, or representatives of customers or prospec- tive customers or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors’ cus- tomers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or prin- cipals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase industry prod- ucts from the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or princi- pals to refrain from dealing or contract- ing to deal with competitors, is an unfair trade practice. § 31.9 Enticing employees. Maliciously enticmg away the em- ployees of competitors with the purpose and effect of unduly hampering, injur- ing, or embarrassing competitors in their business is an unfair trade practice. § 31.10 Fictitious prices. Offering for sale merchandise at a price reduced from a marked-up of fic- titious price with the tendency and capacity to mislead or deceive purchasers or prospective purchasers is an unfair trade practice. Group If § 31.101 Publication of price lists and terms of sale. (a) The industry approves the prac- tice of each individual member of the industry independently publishing and circulating to the purchasing trade its own price lists. (b) The industry approves the prac- tice of making the terms of sale a part of all published price schedules. CoMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES § 31.201 Industry committee. The provisions of § 16.1 of this sub- chapter shall be applicable to an indus- try committee established under this part. [21 F.R, 1174, Feb. 1, 1956} Title 16—Commercial Practices PART 32—-MELAMINE DINNER- WARE INDUSTRY Sec. 32.0 Definitions. Group I 32.1 Misrepresentation and deception in general. 32.2 Misrepresentations as to character of business. 32.3. Misrepresenting products as conform- ing standard. 82.4 Misuse of terms ‘“‘close-outs,” “dis- continued lines,” “special hargains,” ete. 32.5 Substitution of products. 82.6 Deceptive use and imitation of trade Name, corporate name, trademark ete. 32.7 Deceptive Invoicing. 32.8 Fictitious prices, price lists, etc. 32.9 Guaranties, warranties, etc. 32.10 Use of lottery schemes, etc. 82.11 Prohibited forms of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.). 32.12 Prohibited sales below cost. 82.13 Prohibited discrimination. 32.14 Lifting of stocks. 82.15 Consignment distribution. 52.16 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. 82.17 Procurement of competitors’ confi- dential information by unfair means and wrongful use thereof. 82.18 Enticing away employees of com- petitors. 32.19 Exclusive deals. 32.20 Commercial bribery. 82.21 Unlawful interference with compett- tors’ purchases or sales. 82.22 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. AvTHorIry: The provisions of this Part 32 issued under secs. 6, 5, 38 Stat. 721, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Source: The provisions of this Part 32 ap- pear at 21 F.R. 4398, June 22, 1956, unless otherwise noted. § 32.0 Definitions. (a) Members of the industry are those persons, firms, corporations, and organi- zations engaged in the manufacture, de- sign, distribution, or sale of melamine molded dinnerware. (b) As used in the rules in this part, the term “industry products” or “prod- ucts of the industry” consists of dinner- ware molded of melamine plastic matorial. Group I § 32.1 Misrepresentation and deception in general. It is an unfair trade practice to use, or cause or promote the use of, any trade 316 Chopter !|—Federal promotional literature, advertising mat- ter, guarantee, warranty, mark, brand, label, trade name, picture, design or de- vice, designation, or other type of oral or written representation, however dissemi- nated or published, or to fail to disclose any material fact, which has the capac- ity and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers with respect to the type, kind, grade, quality, quantity, size, weight, na- ture, substance, durability, serviceability, origin, preparation, production, manu- facture, distribution, or customary or regular price, of any product of the in- dustry, or which has the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or de- ceiving the purchasing cr consuming public in any other material respect. § 32.2 Misrepresentations as to char- acter of business. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to represent, di- rectly or indirectly, through the use of any word or term in his corporate or trade name, in his advertising or other- wise, that he is a manufacturer of in- dustry products, or that he is the owner or operator of a factory manufacturing them, when such is not the fact, or in any other manner to misrepresent the char- acter, extent, volume, or type of his business. § 32.3 Misrepresenting products as con- forming to standard. In connection with the sale or offering for sale of industry products, it is an un- fair trade practice to represent, through advertising or otherwise, that such prod- ucts conform to any standards recog- nized in or applicable to the industry when such is not the fact. § 32.4 Misuse of terms ‘“close-outs,” “discontinued lines,” “special bar- gains,” etc. It is an unfair trade practice to offer for sale, sell, advertise, describe, or otherwise represent, regular lines of in- dustry products as “close-outs,” “dis- continued lines,” “special bargains,” or by words or representations of similar import, when such are not true in fact; or to so offer for sale, sell, advertise, de- scribe, or otherwise represent, industry products where the capacity and tend- ency or effect thereof is to lead the pur- chasing or consuming public to believe such products are being offered for sale or sold at greatly reduced prices, or at Trade Commission § 32.8 so-called “bargain” prices, when such is not the fact. § 32.5 Substitution of products. It is an unfair trade practice for an in- dustry member to make an unauthorized substitution of products, where such sub- stitution has the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving the purchasing or consuming public, by: (a) Shipping or delivering industry products which do not conform to sam- ples submitted, to specifications upon which the sale is consummated, or to representations made prior to securing the order, without advising the purchaser of the substitution and obtaining his con- sent thereto prior to making shipment or delivery; or (b) Falsely representing the reason for making a substitution. § 32.6 Deceptive use and imitation of trade name, corporate name, trade- mark, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any meinber of the industry to use any trade name, corporate name, trademark, or other trade designation, which has the capacity and tendency of effect of mis- leading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the charac- ter, name, nature, or origin of any product of the industry, or of any ma- terial used therein, or which is false or misleading in any material respect. § 32.7 Deceptive invoicing. Withholding from or inserting in in- voices any statement or information by reason of which omission or insertion a false, inaccurate, or incomplete record is made, which has the capacity and tend- ency or effect of deceiving purchasers, prospective purchasers, or the consuming public in any material respect, is an un- fair trade practice. § 32.8 Fictitious prices, price lists, etc. The publishing or circulating by any member of the industry of false or mis- leading price quotations, price lists, terms or conditions of sale, or reports as to production or sales, with the ca- pacity and tendency or effect of mislead- ing or deceiving purchasers, prospective purchasers, or the consuming public or the advertising, sale, or offering for sale of industry products at prices purport- ing to be reduced from what are in fact fictitious prices, or at purported reduc- tions in prices when such purported re- ductions are in fact fictitious or are 317 § 32.9 otherwise misleading or deceptive, is an unfair trade practice. § 32.9 Guarantees, warranties, etc. (a) In the sale, offering for sale, or dis- tribution of industry products; it is an unfair trade practice for any industry member: (1) To represent that any industry product is guaranteed unless, in close conjunction with such representation, the identity of the guarantor, the extent and nature of the guarantee, and any material conditions or limitations re- lating to the liabillty of the guarantor under the guarantee, are adequately and nondeceptively disclosed; or (2) To offer or use any guarantee re- specting an industry product under which the guarantor fails to observe his obligations thereunder; or (3) To offer or use any guarantee which is otherwise deceptive or unfair. (b) This section shall be applicable not only to guarantees but also to war- rantles, to purported guarantees and warranties, and to any promise or repre- sentation in the nature of a guarantee or warranty. § 32.10 Use of lottery schemes, etc. It is an unfair trade practice to sell, distribute, or promote the sale or dis- tribution of any industry product by means of a game of chance, gift enter- prise, or lottery scheme. § 32.11 Prohibited forms of trade re- straints (unlawful price fixing, ete.).? It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, either directly ‘The inhibitions of this section are sub- Ject to Public Law 542, approved July 14, 1952—66 Stat. 682 (the McGuire Act) which provides that with respect to a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade-mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such com- modity and which fs in free and open com- petition with commodities of the same gen- eral class produced or distributed by others, @ seller of such 8 commodity may enter into a contract or agreement with a buyer thereof which establishes a minimum or stipulated price at which such commodity may be re- sold by such buyer when such contract or agreement is lawful as applied to intrastate transactions under the laws of the State, Territory, or territorial jurisdiction in which the resale ts to be made or to which the ' commodity is to be transported for such re- sale, and when such contract or agreement ts not between manufacturers, or between Title 16—Commercial Practices or indirectly, to engage in any planned common course of action, or to enter into or take part in any understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy, with one or more members of the in- dustry, or with any other person or per- sons, to fix or maintain the price of any goods or otherwise unlawfully to restrain trade; or to use any form of threat, in- timidation, or coercion to induce any member of the industry or other person or persons to engage in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agree- ment, combination, or conspiracy. § 32.12 Prohibited sales below cost. (a) The practice of selling products of the industry at a price less than the cost there of to the seller, with the purpose or intent, and where the effect is, or where there is a reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or tend to create a monopoly, is an unfair trade practice. (b) This section is not to be construed as Prohiblting all sales below cost, but only such selling below the seller’s cost as is resorted to and pursued with the wrongful intent or purpose referred to and where the effect is, or where there is a@ reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or to create a mo- nopoly. Among the situations in which the requisite purpose or intent would ordinarily be lacking are cases in which such sales were: (1) of seasonal goods near the conclusion of the season; (2) of obsolescent goods; (3) made under judicial process; or (4) made in bona fide discontinuance of business in the goods concerned. (c) As used in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this sectlon, the term “cost” means the respective seller’s cost and not an average cost in the industry whether such average cost be determined by an industry cost survey or some other method. It consists of the total outlay or expediture by the seller in the ac- quisition, production, and distribution of the products involved, and comprises all elements of cost such as labor, material, depreciation, taxes (except taxes on net income and such other taxes as are not wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between per- sons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other. 318 Chapter I—Federal Trade Commission properly applicable to cost), and general overhead expenses, incurred by the seller in the acquisition, manufacture, process- ing, preparation for marketing, sale, and delivery of the products. Not to be In- cluded are dividends or interest on bor- rowed or invested capital, or nonoperat- ing losses, such as fire losses and losses from the sale or exchange of capital as- sets. Operating cost shouid not be re- duced by items of nonoperating income, such as income from investments, and gain on the sale of capital assets. (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving an industry mem- ber from compllance with any of the re- quirements of the Robinson-Patman Act. § 32.13 Prohibited discrimination.’ (a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, credits, etc., which effect unlawful price discrimina- tion, It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to grant or allow, secretiy or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, effects a discrimina- tion in price between different pur- chasers of goods of like grade and qual- ity, where either or any of the purchases involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be substan- tially to iessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of com- merce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with cus- tomers of either of them: Provided, however : (1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for usé, con- sumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United 2 As used in this section, the word “com- merce” means “trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions of other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the Dis- trict of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Terri- tory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States.” § 32.13 States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable insti- tutions not operated for profit, as sup- plies for their own use; (2) That nothing contained in this Paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for dif- ferences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or dellvery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which said com- modities are to such purchasers sold or delivered; Nore: Cost justification under the above proviso depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transac- tions under the terms of subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a single delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders or for mul- tiple deliveries. (3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own cus- tomers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade; (4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in re- sponse to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of season goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned; (5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good falth of an equally low price of a com- petitor, or the services or facilities fur- nished by a competitor (see paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section). Nore: In complaint proceedings, Justifica- tion of price differentials under subpara- graphs (2), (4), and (5) of this paragraph is & matter of affirmative defense to be estab- lished by the person or concern charged with price discrimination. (b) The following are examples of price differential practices to be con- sidered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when in- volving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the juris- diction of the United States, and which 319 § 32.13 are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when: (1) The commerce requirements spec- ified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and (2) The price differential has a reasonable probability of substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of com- merce, or of injuring, destroying, or pre- venting completion with che industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit of the price differential, or with customers of either of them; and (3) The price differential is not justi- fied by cost savings (see paragraph (a) (2) of this section) ; and (4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions af- fecting the market for or the market- ability of the goods concerned (see paragraph (a) (4) of this section); and (5) The lower price was not nade to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see paragraph (a) (5) of this section) . Ezample No. 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percent- age of the total of the customer's purchases during such perlod and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like conditions. Ezample No. 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other cus- tomers for like merchandise. It is im- material whether or not such discrimination 1s accomplished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold. (c) Prohibited brokerage and commis- sions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commis- sion, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in Meu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other in- termediary therein where such inter- mediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transac- tion other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid. Title 16—Commercial Practices (d) Prohibited advertising or promo- tional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertis- ing or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensa- tion or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the process- ing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manu- factured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consid- eration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers com- peting in the distribution of such prod- ucts or commodities. Note 1: Industry members giving adver- tising allowances to competing customers must exercise precaution and diligence in seeing that all of such allowances are used in accordance with the terms of their offers, Note 2: When an industry member gives allowances to competing customers for ad- vertising in a newspaper or periodical, the fact that a lower advertising rate for equiva- lent space is availiable to one or more, but not all, such customers, is not to be regarded by the industry member as warranting the retention by such customer or customers of any portion of the allowance for his or their personal use or benefit. (e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade prac- tice for any member of the industry en- gaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without proc- essing, by contracting to furnish or fur- nishing, or by contributing to the fur- nishing of, any services or facilities, connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such com- modity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms. (f) Clarification. The following is presented for the purpose of clarifying the requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section with respect to the supplying of marketing services, facili- ties or allowances by industry members to their customers, but it is not intended to imply by such presentation that other methods which assure of proportional equality of treatment of competing cus- tomers may not also be used. 320 Chapter |l—Federal An industry member may simultane- ously offer to each of his customers com- peting in the resale of his products the same kind of promotional service, facil- ity or allowance of a cost value equal to a uniform percentage of the sales (or purchases) of the industry member’s products by each customer during a spe- cified and identical period of time: Pro- vided, however, That when the service, facility or allowance offered is of a type which under reasonable terms and con- ditions is not usable or suitable to the facilities and business of all customers, and is offered to any one customer, the member offer each of those customers to whom the service, facility or allow- ance is not usable or suitable an alter- nate type of promotional service, facility or allowance which is of equivalent meas- urable cost, is usable by the customer, and is suitable to his facilities and busi- ness, and promptly inform all competing customers of the kind and amount of services, facilities or allowances which he has offered to each and the respec- tive terms and conditions under which such services, facilities or allowances are to be furnished by the industry mem- ber: And provided, further, That when the offer of any service, facility or allow- ance to any customer is conditioned on such customer supplying some reclprocal service, facility or payment, a reciprocal service, facility or payment be required in the offers to all other customers and there be an equality of ratio among all customers as to the measurable cost of that which is supplied by the industry member and the reciprocal service, facil- ity or payment required of any customer. The industry member must take every reasonable precaution to see that serv- ices, facilities or allowances which he furnishes to customers are used m ac- cord with the terms of his offer; and upon failure of the customer to perform any obligation on his part, the industry member must cease supplying the cus- tomer any further service, facllity or allowance. (g) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the in- dustry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the fore- going provisions of this section. Notr: This paragraph is a re-statement of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act as amend- Trade Commission § 32.15 ed. In a complaint proceeding under this section, in order to make out a prima facie violation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2 (a) of said act and not justified under subparagraphs (2), (4) or (5) of paragraph (a) of this sec- tion. When, in any such proceeding, the issue is limited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantitles in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Com- mission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, including: (1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and delivered to him by the seller were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or (2) By showing, when there ts a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the com- peting buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and character specified as to justify the price differential. § 32.14 Lifting of stocks. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to purchase the stock of a distributor or dealer which has been supplied by a competitor or com- petitors when such practice is done as an inducement to the distributor or dealer to discontinue handling competitive products and to handle such member’s products exclusively, and where the ef- fect of such act or practice may be sub- stantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 32.15 Consignment distribution. (a) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ the practice of shipping industry prod- ucts on consignment without the express request of the purchaser. (b) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ the practice of shipping industry prod- ucts on conslgnment or pretended con- signment for the purpose and with the effect of artificlally clogging or closing trade outlets and unduly restricting con- petitors’ use of said trade outlets in get- 321 § 32.16 ting their products to consumers through regular channels of distribution, thereby injuring, destroying, or preventing com- petition or tending to create a monopoly or unreasonably to restrain trade. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any understand- ing or agreement, combination or con- spiracy, or planned common course of action, by and between industry mem- bers, mutually to conform or restrict their practice of shipping goods on con- signment with the intent or effect of lessening competition. § 32.16 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their prod- ucts. The defamation of competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false dis- paragement of competitors’ products in any respect, or of their business methods, selling prices, values, credit terms, pol- icies, or services, is an unfair trade prac- tice. § 32.17 Procnrement of competitors’ confidential information by unfair means and wrongful use thereof. It Is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to obtain infor- mation concerning the business of a com- petitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or mis- leading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority, or by any other unfair ineans, and to use the information so obtained in such manner as to injure said competitor in his busi- ness or to suppress competition or unrea- sonably restrain trade. § 32.18 Enticing away employees of competitors. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry willfully to en- tice away employees or sales representa- tives of competitors with the intent and effect of thereby unduly hampering or in- juring competitors in their business and destroying or substantially lessening competition: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as pro- hibiting employees from seeking more favorable employment, or as prohibiting employers from hiring or offering em- ployment to employees of competitors in good faith and not for the purpose of in- Title 16—Commercial Practices juring, destroying, or preventing com- petition. § 32.19 Exclusive deals. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to contract to sell or sell any industry product, or fix a price charged therefor. or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condi- tion, agreement, or understanding that the purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or of such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 32.20 Commercial bribery. It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or indi- rectly, to give, or offer to give, or permit or cause to be given, money or anything of value to agents, employees, or repre- sentatives of customers or prospective customers, or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors’ customers or prospective customers, without the knowiedge of their employers or princi- pals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principais to purchase or contract to purchase products manufac- tured or sold by such industry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from dealing or contract- ing to deal with competitors. § 32.21 Unlawful interference competitors’ purchases or sales. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, by means of any monopolistic practices or through com- bination, conspiracy, coercion, boycott, threats, or any other unlawful means, directly or indirectly, to interfere with a competitor’s right to purchase his raw materials and supplies from whomsoever he chooses, or to sell his product to whomsoever he chooses. with § 32.22 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. It is an unfair trade practice for any person, firm, or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, directly or in- directly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice specifled in the rules in this part. 322