Combination Storm Window And Door Industry
16 CFR Part 25 · Trade practice rules · in the Code of Federal Regulations 1959-1977 (12 annual editions)
Scanned CFR pages, OCR text may contain errors; the linked Library of Congress PDF is the authority. Not legal advice; not affiliated with the FTC. These rules and guides are historical: most were rescinded or replaced, so do not assume any is in force.
Latest edition: Library of Congress, 1977 CFR · Earliest edition: 1959 CFR
Text (1977 edition, OCR)
§ 25.0 Category II. Rules in this part having ap- plication to industry products composed in whole or in part of a precious metal or metals: 23.22 Misrepresentation as to Gold Content. 23.23 Misrepresentation as to Sliver Con- tent. 23.24 Misuse of Words “Platinum,” “Trid- ium,” “Palladium,” “Ruthenium,” “Rhodium,” and “Osmium.” Additional Requirements Relating to Quality Marks. Category III, Rules in this part having ap~- plication to industry products containing diamonds or imitations thereof: 23.26 Misuse of the Word “Diamond.” 23.27 Misuse of Word “Perfect,” Etc. 23.28 Misuse of Term “Blue White.” 23.29 Misuse of the Term “Properly Cut,” Etc. Misuse of the Word “Brilliant” and “Puil Cut.” Misuse of Term “Clean,” Etc. Misrepresentation of Weight, “Total Weight.” Nors: These rules aiso have application to diamonds which are soid in the loose and unset state. Category IV. Rules in this part having application to industry products contain- ing pearls, cultured pearls, or imitations thereof: 23.33 Misuse of Word “Pearl.” 23.34 Misuse of Terms “Cultured Pearl,” “Cultivated Pearl,’ “Seed Pearl,” “Oriental Pearl,” “Oriental,” “Na- tura,” and “Kultred.” 23.86 Misrepresentation as to Cultured Pearls. Norte: These ruies aiso have application to pearls, cultured pearls, and imitation pearls sold in the loose (unstrung and unset) state. Category V. Rules in this part having ap- plication to industry products containing rubies, sapphires, and emeralds and other precious or semi-precious stones, and syn- thetic and imitation stones: 23.36 Deception as to Precious and Semi- Precious Stones. Misuse of Words “Ruby,” “‘Sapphire,” “Emerald,” “Topaz,” ‘‘Stone,’’ “Birthstone,” Etc. Misuse of Words “Real,” Genuine,” “Natural,” Etc. Misuse of Words “Gem,” ‘“Reproduc- tion,” “Replica,” “Synthetic,” Etc. Note: Industry products covered by the rules in Categories II through V are also subject to the rules in Category I. 23.25 23.30 23.31 23.32 23.37 23.38 23.39 Title 16—Commercial Practices PART 25—COMBINATION STORM WINDOW AND DOOR INDUSTRY Bec. 25.0 Definitions. 25.1 Deception (general). 25.2 Bait advertising. 25.3 Deceptive pricing. 25.4 Guarantees, warranties, etc. 25.5 Use of the word “free.” 25.6 Deceptive testimonials or depictions. 25.7 Misrepresenting products as con- forming to standard. 25.8 Deceptive use of seals. 25.9 Misrepresentation as to character of business. 25.10 Deceptive use of trade or corporate names, trade-marks, etc. 26.11 Substitution of products. 25.12 Misuse of terms “custom built,” “made-to-order,” etc. 25.13 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. 265.14 Imitation of trade-marks, trade names, etc. 25.15 Coercing purchase of one product as & pre-requisite to the purchase of other products. 25.16 Procurement of competitors’ confi- dential information. 265.17 Unfair threats of infringement suits. 25.18 Inducing breach of contract. 25.19 Commercial bribery. 25.20 Prohibited forms of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.) 25.21 Exclusive deals. 26.22 Prohibited discrimination. COMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES 26.201 Industry committee. AvTHORITY: The provisions of this Part 25 issued under secs. 6, 5, 38 Stat. 721, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Sourcs: The provisions of this Part 25 ap- pear at 22 F.R. 1165, Feb. 28, 1957, unless otherwise noted. § 25.0 Definitions. As used in this part, the terms “in- dustry member” and “industry products” shall have the following meanings, re- spectively: (a) Industry member. Any person, firm, corporation, or organization en- gaged in the manufacture, sale, or dis- tribution of industry products as defined in paragraph (b) of this section. (b) Industry products. Industry prod- ucts consist of combination storm windows and doors. The storm windows are designed for permanent attachment and are either the self-storing type or the interchangeable type. The windows basically consist of a frame with chan- 298 Chapter I—-Federal Trade Commission nels, and glass (or other transparent material) inserts and screen inserts. The storm doors basically consist of a frame and glass (or other transparent material) inserts and screen inserts. § 25.1 Deception (general). (a) In the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of industry products, it is an unfair trade practice for any industry member to make any representation which, directly or by implication, or through failure adequately to disclose additional relevant information, has the capacity and tendency to deceive pur- chasers or prospective purchasers in any material respect, including, but not lim- ited to, representations relating to construction, design, model, origin, man- ufacture, quality, strength, utility, dura- bility, or life expectance, of such prod- ucts, or the benefits to be derived from the use thereof, or with respect to the need for repair or maintenance of such products or any service or services to be supplied to purchasers or prospective purchasers of the products. (b) Among the practices inhibited by this section are the following: (1) Representing that savings in fuel, or reduction in heat loss, will result from the use of storm windows or doors, when such representation is false or mislead- ing in any material respect. (2) Representing or implying contrary to fact that a building equipped with combination storm windows and/or doors affords positive protection against prowlers, burglars, or other individuals unlawfully attempting entry into such building. (3) Representing or implying that combination storm windows or doors will not shrink, rot, rust, warp, twist, sag, or otherwise become unserviceable, when such is not the fact. (4) Representing or implying that the metal portions of storm windows and/or doors are made of “aircraft aluminum,” or are of extruded metal, when such is not the fact. (c) The inhibitions of this section are applicable with respect to every species of advertisement or form of representa- tion, whether in a newspaper or other periodical, telephone directory, sales catalog, sales promotional literature, ra~ dio or television broadcast, or other media, or whether in the form of a mark, § 25.3 tag, or label on, affixed to, or accompany- ing, the product. § 25.2 Bait advertising. It is an unfair trade practice for an industry member to offer for sale any in- dustry product when the offer is not a bona fide effort to sell the product so offered. Nore: In determining whether there has been a violation of this section, considera- tion will be given to acts or practices indicat- ing that the offer was not made in good faith for the purpose of selling the adver- tised product, but was made for the purpose of contacting prospective purchasers and selling them a product or products other than the products offered. Among acts or practices whlch will be considered in making that determination are the following: (a) The creation, through the initial offer or advertisement, of a faise impression of the grade, quality, make, value, currency of model, size, usability, or origin of the product offered. (b) The refusal to show, demonstrate, or sell the product offered in accordance with the terms of the offer. (c) The disparagement, by acts or words, of the product offered. (ad) The showing, demonstrating, and in the event of sale, the delivery, of a product which is unusable or impractical for the pur- pose represented or implied in the offer. (e) The refusal, in the event of sale of the product offered, to deliver such product to the buyer within a reasonable time thereafter. (f) The failure to have available a quan- tity of the advertised product sufficient to meet reasonably anticipated demands. It is not necessary that each act or prac- tice set forth be present in order to estab- ish that a particular offer is violative of this section. § 25.3 Deceptive pricing. (a) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to represent or imply, in advertising or otherwise, than an industry product may be pur~ chased for a specified price when such is not the fact; or that an industry product is bemg offered for sale at a reduced price when such is not the fact; or other- wise to deceive purchasers or prospective purchasers with respect to the price of products offered for sale. (b) Among the practices inhibited by this section are: (1) Representing or implying that a stated price if for a complete func- tional combination storm window or 299 § 25.4 door when in fact the product so priced is deficient as to parts necessary and usual to the proper functioning and ap- pearance of such coinbination storm window or door (such as hinges, glass, screening, frames, etc.). (2) Representing or implying that the price of combination storm windows or doors includes certain services, such as installation, adjustments, weather stripping, etc., or includes parts or ac- cessories such as door closers, grilles, etc., when such is not the fact. (3) Representmg or implying that the selling price of any combination storm window or door has been reduced from what is m fact a fictitious price, or that such price is a reduced or special price when it is in fact the regular sell- ing price of such combination storm window or door, or when over a substan- tial period of time the alleged “reduced” or “special” price has been the price at which such products customarily have been sold. (4) Representing or implying that prices applicable only to certain sizes of combination storm windows or doors ap- ply to other or all sizes of such windows or doors. (5) Making or publishing any false, misleading, or deceptive representation concerning installnent sales contracts to be used in the sale of mdustry prod- ducts, the terms or conditions of such contracts, the down payment to be re- quired, the rate of interest or financing cost to be charged, or respecting any other matters relative to such contracts. (6) Representing or Implying, con- trary to fact, that combination storm windows or doors may be purchased at factory prices (“factory to you,” etc.). (c) It is also unfair trade practice to sell, or offer for sale, any combination storm window or door at a price less than the cost thereof to the seller as a “loss leader,” used in mducing, and sold only in combination with, the purchase of other merchandise and/or services on which the seller recoups such loss, when this practice has the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or de- ceiving the purchasing public. § 25.4 Guarantees, warranties, ete. (a) It is an unfair trade practice to represent, in advertising or otherwise, that any industry product is “guaran- teed” unless the nature and extent of such guarantee is conjunctively disclosed and without deceptively minimizing the Title 16—Cemmerelal Practices terms and conditions relating to the obligations of the guarantor. (b) It is also an unfair trade practice to use, or cause to be used, any guarantee in which the obligations of the guaran- tor are impracticable of fulfillment, or in respect to which the guarantor fails or refuses to observe his liabilities thereunder. (c) This section shall be applicable not only to guarantees but also to war- ranties, to purported guarantees and warranties, and to any promise or rep- resentation in the nature of a guarantee or warranty. § 25.5 Use of the word “free.” In connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of industry prod- ucts, it is an unfair trade practice to use the word “free,” or any other word or words of similar import, m advertise- ments or in other offers to the public, as descriptive of an article of merchandise, or service, which is not an unconditional gift, under the following circumstances: (a) When all the conditions, obiiga- tions, or other prerequisites to the re- ceipt and retention of the “free’’ article of merchandise or service offered are not clearly and conspicuously set forth at the outset so as to leave no reasonable probability that the terms of the offer will be misunderstood; and, regardless of such disclosure; (b) When, with respect to any article of merchandise required to be purchased m order to obtain the “free” article or service, the offer (1) increases the or- dinary and usual price of such article of merchandise, or (2) reduces its quality, or (3) reduces the quantity or size thereof. ~ Note: The disclosure required by para- graph (a) of this section shall appear in close conjunction with the word “free” (or other word or words of similar import) wherever such word first appears in each ad- vertisement or offer. A disclosure in the form of a footnote, to which reference is made by use of an asterisk or other symbol piaced next to the word “free,” will not be regarded as compliance. § 25.6 Deceptive pictions. It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry to use any testi- monial of a user of any madustry product or of any other person, or to use any picture or depiction thereof, which is false or which has the capacity and tend- testimonials or de- 300. Chapter |—Federal ency or effect of inisleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers. § 25.7 Misrepresenting products as con- forming to standard. It is an unfair trade practice to repre- sent, through advertising or otherwise, that any product of the industry con- forms to any standard recognized in or applicable to the industry, when such is not the fact. § 25.8 Deceptive use of seals. In the sale, offering for sale, or distri- bution of industry products, it is an un- fair trade practice for any industry member to use a seal or insignia of any organization without the authorization of that organization, or to use any seal or insignia which is of such form or design, or contains such wording, as to simulate the seals or insignia which are issued by an organization for use with respect to other products, when the use thereof has the capacity and tendency or effect of deceiving purchasers or prospective pur- chasers. Nore: Seals of approval used by industry members should identify the organization issuing and/or authorizing the use of the seal. Such seal should be based on adequate inspection and tests of the industry mem- ber’s products and not otherwise contravene the provisions of § 25.1 relating to deception generally. § 25.9 Misrepresentation as to cliaracter of business. It is an unfair trade practice for any industry member, in the course of or in connection with the sale of industry products, to represent, directly or in- directly, that he is a manufacturer of industry products, unless he owns and operates or directly controls a factory wherein such products are made, or in any other inanner to misrepresent the character, extent, or type of his business. § 25.10 Deceptive use of trade or cor- porate names, trade-marks, etc. The use of any trade naine, corporate name, trade-mark, or other trade desig- nation which has the capacity and tend- ency or effect of misleading or deceiving the purchasing or consuming public as to the character, name, nature, or origin of any product of the industry, or of any material used therein, or which is faise or inisleading in any other material re- spect, is an unfair trade practice. Trade Commission § 25.14 § 25.11 Substitution of products. It is an unfair trade practice to make an unauthorized substitution of products, where such substitution has the capacity and tendency or effect of misieading or deceiving the purchasing or consuming public, by— (a) Shipping, delivering, or installing industry products which do not conform to samples submitted, to specifications upon which the sale is consummated, or to representations inade prior to securing the order, without advising the purchaser of the substitution and obtaining his consent thereto prior to making ship- inent or delivery; or . (b) Faisely representing the reason for making a substitution. § 25.12 Misuse of terms “custom built,” “made-to-order,” etc. In the sale, offering for sale, or distri- bution of combination storm windows or doors, it is an unfair trade practice to use the terms “custom built,” “imade-to- order,” or any other words or terms of similar import, as descriptive of any combimation storm window or door which has not been made in accordance with specifications as to the size, quality, composition, etc., supplied by or on be- half of the consumer-purchaser prior to the manufacture or assembly of the in- dustry product, as distinguished from a combination storm window or door which is a ready-made or stock product. § 25.13 Defamation of competitors or faise disparagement of their products. The defamation of competitors by — faisely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false dis- paragement of competitors’ products in any respect, or of their business methods, selling prices, values, credit terms, poli- cies, or services, is an unfair trade practice. § 25.14 Imitation of trade-marks, trade names, etc. The imitation or simulation of trade- marks, trade names, brands, or labels of competitors, with the capacity and tend- ency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers, is an unfair trade practice. 301 § 25.15 § 25.15 Coercing purchase of one prod- uct as a prerequisite to the purchase of other products. The practice of coercing the purchase of one or more products as a prerequisite to the purchase of one or more other products, where the effect may be sub- stantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or unreasonably to restrain trade, is an unfair trade practice. § 25.16 Proeurement of competitors’ confidential information. It is an unfair trade practice for any Member of the industry to obtain in- formation concerning the business of a competitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or mis- leading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority, or by any other unfair means, and to use the information so obtained so as to in- jure said competitor in his business or to suppress competition or unreasonably restrain trade. § 25.17 Unfair threats of infringement suits, The circulation of threats of suit for infringement of patents or trade-marks among customers or prospective cus- tomers of competitors, not made in good faith but for the purpose or with the ef- fect of thereby harassing or intimidating such customers or prospective customers, or of unduly hampering, injuring, or prejudicing competitors in their busi- ness, is an unfair trade practice. § 25.18 Inducing breach of contract. (a) Knowingly inducing or attemping to induce the breach of existing lawful contracts between competitors and their customers or their suppliers, or inter- fering with or obstructing the perform- ance of any such contractual duties or services, under any circumstance having the capacity and tendency or effect of substantially mjuring or lessening pres- ent or potential competition, is an un- fair trade practice. (b) Nothing in this section is intended to imply that it is improper to solicit the business of a customer of a competing imdustry member; nor is the section to be construed as in anywise authoriz- ing any agreement, understanding, or planned common course of action by two or more industry members not to solicit business from the customers of either of them, or from customers of any other industry member. Title 16—Commercial Practices § 25.19 Commercial bribery. It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or in- directly, to give, or offer to give, or permit or cause to be given, money or anything of value to agents, employees, or repre- sentatives of customers or prospective customers, or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors’ customers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or princi- pals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase products manufac- tured or sold by such industry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from dealing or con- tracting to deal with competitors. § 25.20 Prohibited forms of trade re- ovans (unlawful price fixing, etc. ). It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, either directly or indirectly, to engage in any planned common course of action, or to enter into or take part in any understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy, with one or more members of the in- dustry, or with any other person or per- sons, to fix or maintain the price of any goods or otherwise unlawfully to restrain trade; or to use any forin of threat, intimidation, or coercion to in- duce any member of the industry or other person or persons to engage 1 The inhibitions of this section are subject to Public Law 542, approved July 14, 1952, 66 Stat. 632 (the McGuire Act) which pro- vides that with respect to a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade-mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such com- modity and which is in free and open compe- tition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, a seller of such a commodity may enter into a contract or agreement with a buyer thereof which establishes a minimum or stipulated price at which such commodity may be re- sold by such buyer when such contract or agreement is lawful as applied to intrastate transactions under the laws of the State, Territory, or territorial jurisdiction in which the resale is to be made or to which the com- modity is to be transported for such resale, and when such contract or agreement is not between manufacturers, or between whole- salers, or between brokers, or between fac- tors, or between retailers, or between persons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other. 302 Chapter I—Federal in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. § 25.21 Exclusive deals.” It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in com- merce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of any industry product, for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or under- standing that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale or contract for sale, or such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be to substantially lessen competi- tion or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 25.22 Prohibited discrimination." (a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, credits, etc., which effect unlawful price discrimina- tion. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to grant or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, effects a discrim- ination in price between different pur- chasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be sub- stantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of com- merce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit ’ As used in this section, the word ‘“com- merce” means “trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places under the Jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation. or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States.” Trade Commission § 25.22 of such discrimination, or with cus- tomers of either of them: Provided, however: (1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, con- sumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable in- stitutions not operated for profit, as sup- plies for their own use; (2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for dif- ferences in the cost of manufacture, sale; or delivery resulting from ‘the dif- fering methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered; Norte: Cost justification under the above proviso depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transac- tions under the terms of subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a singie delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders for multiple deliveries. (3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own cus- tomers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade; (4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in re- sponse to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of seasonal goods, actual or imminent deterioration of per- ishable good, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discon- tinuance of business in the goods con- cerned; (5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a com- petitor, or the services or facilities fur- nished by a competitor. Note: In complaint proceedings, justifi- cation of price diflerentials under subpara- graphs (2), (4), and (5) of this paragraph of this section is a matter of affirmative de- fense to be estabilshed by the person or con- cern charged with price discrimination. 303 § 25.22 (b) Examples of price differential practices. The foilowing are examples of price differential practices to be con- sidered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when in- volving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the juris- diction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when— (1) The commerce requirements spec- ified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and (2) The price differential has a rea- sonable probability of substantially less- ening competition or tending to create a monopoiy in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying, or preventing competition with the industry member or with the customer receiving the bene- fit of the price differential, or with cus- tomers of either of them; and (3) The price differential is not justi- fied by cost savings (see paragraph (a) (2) of this section) ; and (4) The price differentia] is not made in response to changing conditions af- fecting the market for or the market- ability of the goods concerned (see para- graph (a) (4) of this section); and (5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see (a)(5) of this section). Example No. 1. At the end of a given pe- riod an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percent- age of the total of the customer's purchases during such period and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like con- ditions. Example No. 2. An industry member seils goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other custom- ers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is ac- complished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold. (c) Prohibited brokerage and commis- sions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such com- merce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commis- sion, brokerage, or other compensation or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of Title 16—Commercial Practices goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other in- termediary therem where such interme- diary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid- (a) Prohibited advertising or promo- tional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the in- dustry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facili- ties furnished by or through such cus- tomer in connection with the process- ing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manu- factured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consid- eration is available on proportionally equai terms to all other customers com- peting in the distribution of such prod- ucts or commodities. (e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade prac- tice for any member of the industry en- gaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without proc- essing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the fur- nishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commod- ity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all competing purchasers on propor- tionaily equal terms. (f) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the forego- ing provisions of this section. Nove: Paragraph (f) of this section is a re- statement of section 2 (f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding un- der this section of said act, in order to make out a prima facie violation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or know- ing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2(a) of said act and not justified under subpara- graphs (2), (4), or (5) of paragraph (a) of 304 Chapter |—Federal Trade Commission this section. When, in any such proceeding, the issue is Mmited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due ailowance for differences in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Com- mission may establish a prima facte case in a@ number of ways, inciuding: (1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and delivered to him by the selier were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or (2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the com- peting buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower prices knew the nature and extcnt of such differences and knew or should have Known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and char- acter specified as to justify the price differ- ential. (g) Purchases by U.S. Government— Applicability of Robinson-Patman Anti- discrimination Act to same. In an opinion submitted to the Secretary of War under date of December 28, 1936, the U.S. Attorney General advised that the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimma- tion Act “is not applicable to Govern- ment contracts for supplies.” (38 Opin- ions, Attorney General 539.) COMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES § 25.201 Industry committee. The provisions of § 16.1 of this sub- chapter shall be applicable to an in- dustry committee established under this part. PART 26—REFRIGERATION AND/OR _ AIR-CONDITIONING CONTRACT- ING INDUSTRIES Sec. 26.0 Applicability of the rules in this part. Group I 26.1 Deception (general). 26.2 Guarantees, warranties, etc. 26.3. Prohibited discrimination. 26.4 Substitution of products. 26.5 Misrepresenting products as conform- ing to standard. 26.6 Deceptive prices. 26.7 Misrepresentation as to character of business. 26.8 Inducing breach of contract. 26.9 Prohibited sales below cost. 26.10 Commercial bribery. § 26.1 Sec. 26.11 Enticing away employees of competi- tors. Deception as to used or rebuilt prod- ucts. Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. Exclusive deals. Prohibited forms of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.). AutuoritTy: The provisions of this Part 26 issued under secs. 6, 5, 33 Stat. 721, 719; 15 U.8.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Source: The provisions of this Part 26 ap- pear at 21 FR 3046, May 8, 1956, uniess otherwise noted. § 26.0 Applicability of the rules in this part. The rules in this part have application to persons, firms, corporations, and or- ganizations engaged in the sale and in- stallation of: (a) Mechanical refrigeration units or systems for commercial or industrial use; or (b) Mechanical air-conditioning units or systems for commercial, industrial, or home use. Norte 1. As above used, the word “installa- tion” makes reference to services the per- formance of which requires engineering knowledge and skill. Thus, window air~con- ditioning units and mechanical refrigeration units which are of such size and type as to require but a “piug in” to an established electric power system are not to be consid- ered as products to which these rules have application. Nore 2. As above used, the words “air- conditioning units or systems” make refer- ence to units or systems which are either capable of lowering, or of both lowering and raising, the temperature of the air within an enclosure and simultaneously effecting a substantial degree of control of the humidity and circulation of the air in such enclosure. Units or systems which are designed to ratse, but not lower, the temperature of air within an enclosure are not products to which these rules have application. Nore 3. The above is to be construed as definement of the nature of activities to which the rules have application and is not tntended as definement of the kind of prod- ucts which may be designated “air condi- tioners” or “refrigeration units or systems.” Group | § 26.1 Deception (general). In connection with the sale and in- stallation of industry products, it is an unfair trade practice to use, or cause or promote the use of, any trade promo- tional literature, advertising matter, mark, brand, label, or device, or any 26.12 26.13 26.14 26.15 805