Rabbit Industry
16 CFR Part 103 · Trade practice rules · in the Code of Federal Regulations 1959-1978 (14 annual editions)
Scanned CFR pages, OCR text may contain errors; the linked Library of Congress PDF is the authority. Not legal advice; not affiliated with the FTC. These rules and guides are historical: most were rescinded or replaced, so do not assume any is in force.
Latest edition: Library of Congress, 1978 CFR · Earliest edition: 1959 CFR
Text (1978 edition, OCR)
§ 103.0 with a memorandum of sale identifying the buyers. There is no violation of paragraph (a) of this section in this example. In such a situation wherein the names of the buyers are not initially disclosed by the broker to his seller-principal it is the broker’s respon- sibility to provide confirmation and memo- randa as will clearly establish his role as a broker, and it is the seller’s responsibility to ascertain that the broker is not the buyer. Example No. 2. An industry member who is regularly engaged as a packer and shipper of fresh fruits and vegetables has an inad- equate supply of a particular commodity to meet his needs at a particular time. He pur- chases the necessary quantity to meet such needs from another regularly engaged packer-shipper operating at the same level of distribution. By prearrangement, the pur- chaser is allowed an inter-packing house dis- count. Such practice does not violate para- graph (a) of this section. Example No. 3. An industry member sells industry products through his broker to some purchasers and direct, without the ser- vices of his broker, to other purchasers. In doing so he charges lower prices to some customers because in making sales to them he incurs less selling and delivery expense other than savings in brokerage fees and commissions than he incurs in selling or de- livering products to the other customers. Note: A price differential which is not vio- lative of paragraph (a) of thls section may nevertheless be violative of § 74.1. [Rule 2] PART 103—RABBIT INDUSTRY Sec. 103.0 The industry and its products de- fined. 103.1 Misrepresentation of products. 103.2 Misrepresentation concerning prolifi- cacy, growth, disease-resistance, develop- ment of superior meat, fur, or hair, etc. 103.3. Misrepresenting industry products as meeting requirements of a standard or specification. 103.4 Misrepresentation as to character of business. . 103.5 Misrepresentation concerning pur- chase of offspring of rabbits or cavies, etc. 103.6 Bait advertising. 103.7 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products. 103.8 Prohibited discrimination. 103.9 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. AvutnHonriry: Secs. 6(g), 5, 38 Stat. 722, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45, unless otherwise noted. Source: 23 FR 4737, June 27, 1958, unless otherwise noted. Title 16—Commerciol Practices $103.0 The industry and its products de- fined. (a) Products of the industry covered by the rules in this part include all types, breeds, varieties, or strains of live domestic rabbits or cavies. (b) Members of the industry are per- sons, firms, corporations, and organi- zations engaged in the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of any such products. § 103.1 Misrepresentation of products. In the sale, offering for sale, or dis- tribution of industry products, it is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to make or publish, or cause to be inade or published, any statement or representation (whether in the form of advertisement, trade promotional literature, mark, stamp, brand, label, depiction, photograph, il- lustration, radio or television broad- cast, or otherwise) which, directly or by implication, has the capacity and tendency or effect of deceiving pur- chasers or prospective purchasers con- cerning: (a) The grade, quality, quantity, age, price, value, pedigree, registration, origin, weight, health, strength, growth, livability, size, productivity, breeding, raising, or desirability, of any industry product; or (ob) The hair of any industry prod- uct, the growth, use, grade, or value thereof, or the market for such hair; or (c) The delivery or purported deliv- ery dates or other terms or conditions of delivery or sale of any industry product; or (d) The experience needed, or pur- ported gross sales, income, profits, or opportunities, in connection with the breeding, raising, or marketing of any industry product; or (e) Any other material matter relat- ing to the breeding, raising, or market- ing of such product. § 103.2 Misrepresentation concerning pro- lificacy, growth, disease-resistance, de- velopment of superior meat, fur, or hair, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any industry member to represent, directly or by implication, through advertising - or otherwise, that any rabbits or 410 Chapter I—Federal Trade Commission cavies, or breeds, or varieties, or strains thereof, are more prolific or grow faster, are more disease-resistant, or develop, a higher quality of meat, fur, or hair, than is in fact the case. § 103.3 Misrepresenting industry products as meeting requirements of a standard or specification. In the sale, offering for sale, or dis- tribution of industry products, it is an unfair trade practice, directly or indi- rectly, to represent: (a) That an industry product meets the requireinents of a standard or specification, or any quality rating or designation provided for by a standard or specification, when such is not the fact; or (b) That an industry product meets the requirements of a standard or specification, or any quality rating or designation provided for by a standard or specification, without a clear and adequate identification of such stan- dard or specification and disclosure as to whether same is an official, indus- try, or private standard or specifica- tion, nade in immediate conjunction with the representation; or (c) That an industry product meets the requirements of a standard or specification which is not applicable to industry products, or which has been rescinded or superseded and no clear and adequate disclosure of such fact is made in immediate conjunction with the representation; or to make refer- ence to any standard or specification, or any quality rating, grade, or desig- nation provided for by any standard or specification, in such a manner, or under such circumstances as to mis- lead purchasers or prospective pur- chasers as to the kind, grade, or qual- ity of any product of the industry. § 103.4 Misrepresentation as to character of business. It is an unfair trade practice for any industry member to represent, directly or by implication, in his advertising or otherwise, that he is a raiser or breed- er of industry products or that he had actually raised or bred particular in- dustry products, when such is not the fact, or in any other manner to mis- represent the character, extent, or type of his business. § 103.7 $103.5 Misrepresentation concerning pur- cbase of offspring of rabbits or cavies, ete. It is an unfair trade practice for any industry member to represent, directly or by implication, through advertising or otherwise, that (a) he will buy back the offspring of the rabbits or cavies sold by him, when such is not the fact, or (b) that he will buy back such offspring at any price or prices in excess of those he actually will pay for the rabbit or cavy young of stock pur- chased from him. § 103.6 Bait advertising. It is an unfair trade practice for an industry member to offer for sale any industry product when the offer is not a bona fide effort to sell the product so offered. Nore: In determining whether there has been a violation of this section, consider- ation will be given to acts or practices indi- cating that the offer was not made in good faith for the purpose of selling the adver- tised product, but was made for the purpose of contacting prospective purchasers and selling them a product or products other than the product offered. Among acts or practices which will be considered in making that determination are the following: (a) The creation, through the initial offer or advertisement, of a false impression of the grade, quality, value, size, or origin of the product offered, or in other material re- spect. (b) The disparagement, by acts or words, of the product offered. (c) The refusal, in the event of sale of the product offered, to deliver such product to the buyer within a reasonable time there- after. (d) The failure to have available a quanti- ty of the advertised product sufficient to meet reasonably anticipated demands. It is not necessary that each act or prac- tice set forth above be present in order to establish that a particular offer is violative of this section. 8103.7 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of tbeir products. It is an unfair trade practice: (a) To defame competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable con- duct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations; or (b) To falsely disparage a competi- tor’s products, business methods, sell- 411 § 103.8 ing prices, values, credit terms, poli- cies, or services. § 103.8 Prohibited discrimination. ' (a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, credits, etc., which effect unlawful price dis- crimination. It is an unfair trade prac- tice for any industry member engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to grant or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, ef- fects a discrimination in price between different purchasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a mo- nopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of thei: Provided, however: (1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, con- sumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public li- braries, churches, hospitals, and chari- table institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, (2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the dif- fering methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchas- ers sold or delivered; 1As used in this section, the word “com- merce” means ‘‘trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or be- tween any insular possessions or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdic- tion of the United States.” Title 16—Commerciol Practices Note: Cost justification under paragraph (a)(2) of this section depends upon net sav- ings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transactions under the terms of this proviso. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a speci- fied quantity by a single order for a singie delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not foilow that the same discount can be cost justified if grant- ed to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders or for multiple deliveries. (3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade; (4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in re- sponse to changing conditions affect- ing the market for or the marketabil- ity of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned. (5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of competitor. Norte: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (e) of this section. (b) Prohibited brokerage and com- missions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry en- gaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or dis- count in lieu thereof, except for ser- vices rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect con- trol, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is.so granted or paid. (ec) Prohibited advertising or promo- tional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay 412 Chapter I—Federal Trade Commissian or contract for the payment of adver- tising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connec- tion with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any prod- ucts or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or con- sideration is available on proportional- ly equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodlties. (d) Prohibited discriminatory ser- vices or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the indus- try engaged in commerce to discrimi- nate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contribut- ing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the pro- cessing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all com- peting purchasers on proportionally equal terms. Norte: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (e) of this section. (e) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the fore- going provisions of this section. ° Note: This paragraph is a restatement of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding under this sec- tion, in order to make out a prima facie vio- lation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2(a) of said act and not justified under paragraphs (a)(2), (4), or (5) of this section. When, in any such proceed- ing, the issue is limited to the question of § 103.9 whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences in cost of manufacturing, sale, or delivery re- sulting from the differing methods or quan- tities in which the goods were sold and de- livered, the Commission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, in- cluding: (1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and delivered to him by the seller were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or (2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the compet- ing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and char- acter specified as to justify the price differ- ential. Norte: This section is based on the provi- sions of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act. Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended, to which reference is made in the note to paragraph (a5) of this sec- tion and in the note to paragraph (d) of this section reads as follows: “Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this sec- - tion, and unless justification shall be affir- matively shown, the Commission is autho- rized to issue an order terminating the dis- crimination: Provided, however, That noth- ing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnish- ing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.” § 103.9 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices. It is an unfair trade practice for any person, firm, or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, direct- ly or indirectly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice speci- fied in this part. 413