Consumer Law Library

DMB Financial, LLC

Agency
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Date
Type
enforcement action
Source
consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/actions/dmb-financial-llc/
Pages
44
PDFs
2 documents (links below)

Documents in this case

Case summary

On December 1, 2020, the Bureau filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against DMB Financial, LLC (DMB). DMB, which has its principal place of business in Beverly, Massachusetts, offers to renegotiate, settle, or otherwise alter the terms of unsecured debts owed by consumers to creditors or debt collectors. As alleged in the Bureau’s complaint, since its establishment in 2003, DMB claims to have successfully negotiated and settled over $1 billion of consumer debt for over 30,000 consumers who have enrolled in its debt-settlement or debt-relief programs. The Bureau alleges that in connection with its debt-settlement and debt-relief services, DMB engaged in abusive and deceptive acts or practices in violation of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) and deceptive acts and practices in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA). The Bureau also alleges that DMB’s alleged TSR violations also constitute violations of the CFPA.

On May 19, 2021, the court entered a stipulated final judgment and order that resolved the Bureau’s claims. The settlement requires DMB to pay $7,700,000 in redress to consumers. This amount will be suspended based on DMB’s demonstrated inability to pay and upon its payment of $5,400,000 within an agreed-upon timeframe and a $1 civil money penalty to the Bureau. The settlement also requires DMB to refrain from charging unlawful settlement fees, engaging in specified deceptive practices, or obtaining consumers’ credit reports without a permissible purpose.

Complaint ()

PDF of this document (14 pages)

Page 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, Plaintiff, v.

DMB Financial, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-12147

COMPLAINT The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) brings this action against DMB Financial, LLC (DMB) and alleges as follows.

INTRODUCTION 1.

The Bureau brings this action under the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (Telemarketing Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6102(c), 6105(d); the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), 16 C.F.R. pt. 310; and the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531, 5536(a), 5564, 5565, in connection with the marketing and sale of debt-settlement or debt-relief services.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2.

This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action because it is brought under “Federal consumer financial law,” 12 U.S.C. § 5565(a)(1), presents a federal question, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and is brought by an agency of the United States, 28 U.S.C. § 1345. 3.

Venue is proper because DMB is located or resides or does business in this district. 12 U.S.C. § 5564(f).

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 14

Page 3

PARTIES 4.

The Bureau is an independent agency of the United States created by the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5491(a). It has independent litigating authority and may secure appropriate relief for violations of the CFPA, 12 U.S.C. § 5564(a)–(b), and the TSR, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6102(c), 6105(d). 5.

DMB, a Massachusetts limited-liability company, maintains its principal place of business at 500 Cummings Center, Suite 3800, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915. 6.

DMB offers and provides “financial advisory services,” including debt-settlement services, to consumers owing unsecured debts to creditors. Those activities are “consumer financial services or products” under the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5481(5)(A), (15)(A)(viii)(II). DMB is therefore a “covered person” under the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5481(6). 7.

In connection with a campaign to make interstate phone calls to consumers and to use advertisements to solicit calls from consumers to induce them to purchase its services, wherein DMB offers to renegotiate, settle, or in any way alter the terms of payment or other terms of the debt between a person and one or more unsecured creditors or debt collectors, DMB initiates and receives telephone calls from consumers. Thus, DMB is a “telemarketer” offering a “debt relief service” under the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.2(o), (ff). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 8.

DMB is a debt-settlement company. Established in 2003, DMB claims that it has successfully negotiated and settled consumer debts in excess of $1 billion for over 30,000 consumers who have enrolled in its debt-settlement programs. 9.

DMB’s debt-settlement programs are advertised to consumers through DMB’s website and direct-mail campaigns, which advertise a toll-free telephone number that consumers Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 14

Page 4

could call to enroll in DMB’s programs, and by outside marketing companies through the use of live-transfer companies or lead generators that direct consumers to DMB. 10.

DMB’s employees have received phone calls from prospective customers and have initiated phone calls to prospective customers in at least 24 states to persuade them to enroll in its debt-settlement programs.

11.

DMB has instructed consumers who had been making payments to their creditors to withhold any further payments. Because DMB requires consumers to stop paying creditors, its programs are likely to result in increased interest and fees after enrollment. 12.

DMB has required consumers enrolled in its debt-settlement program to deposit funds into dedicated accounts with an FDIC-insured account provider. DMB has claimed that once there were sufficient funds in those accounts to make settlement offers to consumers’ creditors, DMB would negotiate with the creditors to persuade them to accept less than the individual debt amounts owed.

13.

When an individual debt enrolled in its debt-settlement program was settled or a creditor ceased attempts to collect the debt (in the absence of a settlement), DMB would charge consumers fees.

The Financial Liberty Program and the Financial Independence Program 14.

Since at least 2012, DMB has offered two debt-settlement programs: the Financial Liberty Program (Liberty Program) and the Financial Independence Program (Independence Program). The only difference between the programs is how DMB structures the fee charged to consumers. Consumers enrolled in the Liberty Program pay DMB a settlement fee that is a percentage of the consumer’s debt balance. Consumers enrolled in the Independence Program Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 3 of 14

Page 5

pay DMB a settlement fee that is a percentage of what consumers saved as a result of any debt settlement that DMB secures for consumers.

15.

To enroll in the Liberty Program, DMB required consumers to complete and sign a Debt Settlement & Negotiation Services Agreement (the Liberty Enrollment Agreement) and a Financial Program Questionnaire (the Liberty Questionnaire). 16.

To enroll in the Independence Program, DMB required consumers to complete and sign a Debt Settlement & Negotiation Services Agreement (the Independence Enrollment Agreement) and a Financial Program Questionnaire (the Independence Questionnaire). 17.

The Independence Enrollment Agreement and the Liberty Enrollment Agreement state: “I understand that my commitment is essential for the success of this Program and settlements will not be attempted until I have saved sufficient funds in my designated Savings Account.”

18.

The Independence Questionnaire and the Liberty Questionnaire require that consumers initial the following statement: “You agree to commit to the DMB Financial [Liberty/Independence] Program, whereby our average Client negotiates and settles their outstanding debts for approximately 50% of the total amount due at the time of settlement, in 36 months, with no prepayment penalties.”

DMB’s Method of Calculating Fees 19.

Some versions of DMB’s Liberty Enrollment Agreement stated that the consumer “agrees to pay the Company a fee in the amount of [__]% of the Enrolled Debt on each given account negotiated and settled under the Program.” These agreements also described the “Fee Structure” as a “[p]er settlement fee of [__]% of debt balance as determined at time of enrollment.”

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 4 of 14

Page 6

20.

Some versions of DMB’s Independence Enrollment Agreement stated that the consumer “agrees to pay the Company a fee in the amount of [__]% of the Amount Saved by the Company on each given account negotiated and settled under the Program (that is, the difference between the creditors’ claim amount (at the time of enrollment negotiations) and the agreed upon Final Settlement Payment).” The Independence Enrollment Agreement also described the “Fee Structure” as a “[p]er settlement fee of [__]% of savings off debt balance as determined at time of enrollment.”

21.

Completed Liberty and Independence Enrollment Agreements included a Creditor Summary Page, which listed, among other things, each debt enrolled in the program and the debt balance at the time of enrollment.

22.

Despite representations in these enrollment materials that DMB’s fee would be a percentage of, or the savings off of, the enrolled debt, DMB charged enrolled consumers a fee based on what DMB called the “Verified Debt.”

23.

The Verified Debt amounts were often greater than the debt amounts listed on the Creditor Summary Page.

24.

Before 2019, DMB used the term “Verified Debt Amount” to mean the amount of debt verified by DMB based on a creditor statement submitted by the consumer, or when no creditor statement was provided, the debt balance at the time DMB contacted the creditor to negotiate a settlement.

25.

Beginning in 2019, DMB began verifying debt amounts based on the amount reported on the consumer’s consumer credit report, which was obtained at or near the time of enrollment.

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 5 of 14

Page 7

26.

Until 2019, if DMB never received a creditor statement submitted by a consumer for a particular debt, DMB calculated its settlement fee based on the debt amount after enrollment—often the debt amount at the time of settlement—instead of the debt amount at the time of enrollment.

27.

The debt amount after enrollment is often greater than the debt amount at the time of enrollment because the debt continues to accrue interest and fees until a settlement is reached. DMB’s Charging of Deceptive and Unlawful Fees 28.

Since at least 2012, the Liberty and Independence Enrollment Agreements have stated: “The Client agrees to pay the Company a fee . . . on each given account negotiated and settled under the Program. . . . Once Client receives an offer from any creditor enrolled in program, accepts and makes first payment toward settlement, Company is entitled to receive its full fee proportional to debt enrolled.”

29.

In two scenarios, DMB charged consumers its fee contrary to the terms of its enrollment agreements: (1) DMB charged some consumers its fee when DMB had not successfully settled consumers’ debts; and (2) DMB charged some consumers its fee before consumers had made a first payment toward settlement.

30.

DMB requested or received fees from at least hundreds of consumers when a creditor, in the absence of a binding settlement, stopped collecting from a consumer, sometimes following a charge-off. In such circumstances, the consumer had not executed a settlement agreement and had made no settlement payment to the creditor or any debt collector before DMB charged its fee. These consumers could still be subject to collection efforts, including real or threatened litigation, and their credit reports could continue to reflect an unpaid or delinquent debt in the trade line for that creditor. DMB did not disclose to consumers that it would charge Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 6 of 14

Page 8

its fee under these circumstances, and consumers did not agree when they enrolled in DMB’s programs to pay fees in these circumstances.

31.

DMB requested or received fees from thousands of consumers even though the consumers had not yet made at least one payment under a settlement agreement, debtmanagement plan, or other valid contractual agreement. DMB did not disclose to consumers that it would charge its fee in this circumstance, and consumers did not agree when they enrolled in DMB’s programs to pay fees in this circumstance.

Count 1 DMB’s Violations of the TSR and the CFPA (Charging Advance Fees) 32.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

33.

It is a violation of the TSR for any seller or telemarketer in connection with the sale of any debt-relief service to request or receive payment of any fee or consideration for any debt-relief service until and unless, in addition to other requirements, the customer has made at least one payment under that settlement agreement, debt-management plan, or other valid contractual agreement between the customer and the creditor or debt collector. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i)(B).

34.

DMB has requested and received fees from consumers in connection with enrolled debts even though consumers have not made any payments under a settlement agreement, debt-management plan, or other valid contractual agreement between the consumers and the creditor or debt collector.

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 7 of 14

Page 9

35.

DMB’s requesting or receiving payment of fees from consumers under the circumstances described in paragraph 34 is an abusive act or practice in telemarketing that violates the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i)(B).

36.

In addition, DMB’s violation of the TSR is treated as a violation of a rule under § 1031 of the CFPA. 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c). DMB therefore has also violated § 1036(a)(1)(A) of the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(A).

Count 2 DMB’s Violations of the TSR and the CFPA (Charging Fees in Absence of a Settlement) 37.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

38.

It is a violation of the TSR for any seller or telemarketer in connection with the sale of any debt-relief service to request or receive payment of any fee or consideration for any debt-relief service until and unless: (1) the seller or telemarketer has renegotiated, settled, reduced, or otherwise altered the terms of at least one debt under a settlement agreement, debt management plan, or other such valid contractual agreement executed by the customer; (2) the customer has made at least one payment under that settlement agreement, debt-management plan, or other valid contractual agreement between the customer and the creditor or debt collector; and (3) where the debts are renegotiated, settled, reduced, or otherwise altered individually, the fee or consideration must be proportional to the debts that have been so settled, or else charged at a flat percentage of the amount saved as a result of such settlements. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i).

39.

DMB has requested and received fees from consumers in connection with enrolled debts even though DMB had not renegotiated, settled, reduced, or otherwise altered the Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 8 of 14

Page 10

terms of these debts under a settlement agreement, debt-management plan, or other such valid contractual agreement executed by the consumers, and consumers had not made any payments under a settlement agreement, debt-management plan, or other valid contractual agreement between the consumers and the creditor or debt collector. 40.

DMB’s requesting or receiving payment of fees from consumers under the circumstances described in paragraph 39 is an abusive act or practice in telemarketing that violates the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i).

41.

DMB’s violation of the TSR is treated as a violation of a rule under § 1031 of the CFPA. 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c). DMB therefore has also violated § 1036(a)(1)(A) of the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(A).

Count 3 DMB’s Violations of the CFPA (Deceptive Representations Regarding Chargeable Events) 42.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

43.

DMB has represented to consumers that it would not charge any fee for its services until it settled a debt and consumers have made a settlement payment to the creditor. In fact, DMB has charged consumers its fee in cases where it did not settle the consumer’s debt, the consumer did not make a settlement payment, or both. 44.

DMB’s representations regarding when it would charge or collect its fees from consumers were likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably. The circumstances in which DMB charges consumers fees are material terms. DMB’s charging of fees to consumers as described in paragraph 43 is a deceptive act or practice that violates the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531(a), 5536(a)(1)(B).

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 9 of 14

Page 11

Count 4 DMB’s Violations of the TSR and CFPA (Charging Fees Based on Debt Amount after Enrollment) 45.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

46.

To the extent a seller or telemarketer renegotiates, settles, reduces, or otherwise alters a consumer’s enrolled debts individually over time, the TSR prohibits the seller or telemarketer from requesting or receiving any fee or consideration unless such fee or consideration: (1) bears the same proportional relationship to the total fee for renegotiating, settling, reducing, or altering the terms of the consumer’s entire debt balance as the individual debt amount bears to the entire debt amount, with the individual debt amount and the entire debt amount being those owed at the time the debt was enrolled in the service; or (2) is a percentage of the amount saved as a result of the renegotiation, settlement, reduction, or alteration; the percentage charged cannot change from one individual debt to another, and the amount saved is the difference between the amount owed at the time the debt was enrolled in the service and the amount actually paid to satisfy the debt. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i)(C). 47.

DMB settles consumers’ debts individually over time and has requested or received fees based on the debt amount after enrollment instead of the debt amount at the time of enrollment such that the fee neither (1) bears the same proportional relationship to the total fee as the enrolled debt amount bears to the entire debt amount at the time of enrollment; nor (2) is a percentage of the amount saved when the amount saved is the difference between the debt amount at the time of enrollment and the settlement amount. Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 10 of 14

Page 12

48.

DMB’s practice of requesting or receiving settlement fees described in paragraph 47 constitutes an abusive act or practice in telemarketing that violates the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i)(C).

49.

DMB’s violation of the TSR is treated as a violation of a rule under § 1031 of the CFPA. 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c). DMB therefore has also violated § 1036(a)(1)(A) of the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(A).

Count 5 DMB’s Violations of the CFPA (Deceptive Representations about Fee Structure) 50.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

51.

Until 2019, some of DMB’s contracts represented to consumers that DMB would charge a fee based on either the amount of the “Enrolled Debt” or the “debt balance as determined at the time of enrollment.” In fact, DMB charged consumers based on what DMB called “Verified Debt” amounts, which were determined after enrollment. 52.

Accordingly, some of DMB’s contracts misrepresented to consumers the debt amount that would be used to determine DMB’s fees for debt-relief services. 53.

These representations were likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances because they specified that the enrolled debt amount would be used to determine DMB’s fee.

54.

The fee that DMB charges to consumers and the debt amount on which the fee is based are material.

55.

DMB’s omissions and misrepresentations constitute deceptive acts or practices that violate the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531(a), 5536(a)(1)(B). Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 11 of 14

Page 13

Count 6 DMB’s Violations of the TSR and the CFPA (Failing to Disclose Amount of Time Necessary Before Settlement Offer Made) 56.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

57.

It is a violation of the TSR for any seller or telemarketer in connection with the sale of any debt-relief service to fail to disclose truthfully, in a clear and conspicuous manner before a customer consents to pay for those services, to the extent that the service may include a settlement offer to any of the customer’s creditors or debt collectors, the time by which the debtrelief-service provider will make a bona fide settlement offer to each of the creditors or debt collectors. 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(A).

58.

DMB failed to disclose before enrollment in a clear and conspicuous manner the time by which DMB would make a bona fide settlement offer to each of a consumer’s creditors or debt collectors.

59.

DMB’s failure to disclose in a clear and conspicuous manner the time by which DMB would make a bona fide settlement offer to each of a consumer’s creditors or debt collectors is a deceptive act or practice in telemarketing that violates the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(A).

60.

DMB’s violation of the TSR is treated as a violation of a rule under § 1031 of the CFPA. 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c). DMB therefore has also violated § 1036(a)(1)(A) of the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(A).

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 12 of 14

Page 14

Count 7 DMB’s Violations of the TSR and the CFPA (Failing to Disclose the Amount of Money for Each Outstanding Debt to be Saved) 61.

The Bureau incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Complaint.

62.

It is a violation of the TSR for any seller or telemarketer in connection with the sale of any debt-relief service to fail to disclose truthfully, in a clear and conspicuous manner before a customer consents to pay for those services, to the extent that the service may include a settlement offer to any of the customer’s creditors or debt collectors, the amount of money or the percentage of each outstanding debt that the customer must accumulate before the debt-reliefservice provider will make a bona fide settlement offer to each of the creditors or debt collectors. 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(B).

63.

DMB failed to disclose before enrollment in a clear and conspicuous manner the amount of money or the percentage of each outstanding debt that a consumer must accumulate before DMB would make a bona fide settlement offer on the consumer’s behalf. 64.

DMB’s failure to disclose in a clear and conspicuous manner before enrollment the amount of money or the percentage of each outstanding debt that a consumer must accumulate before DMB would make a bona fide settlement offer to each of the consumer’s creditors or debt collectors is a deceptive act or practice in telemarketing that violates the TSR. 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(B).

65.

In addition, DMB’s violation of the TSR is treated as a violation of a rule under § 1031 of the CFPA. 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c). DMB therefore has also violated § 1036(a)(1)(A) of the CFPA. 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(A).

Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 13 of 14

Page 15

DEMAND FOR RELIEF The Bureau requests that the Court: a.

permanently enjoin DMB from committing future violations of the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6102(c), 6105(d); the TSR, 16 C.F.R. pt. 310; and the CFPA, 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531, 5536(a), and any other provision of “Federal consumer financial law,” as defined by 12 U.S.C. § 5481(14); b.

grant additional injunctive relief as the Court may deem just and proper; c.

order DMB to pay redress to consumers harmed by its unlawful conduct; d.

order DMB to disgorge all ill-gotten gains; e.

impose on DMB civil money penalties; f.

award costs against DMB; and g.

award additional relief as the Court may determine to be just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS G. WARD Enforcement Director JEFFREY PAUL EHRLICH Deputy Enforcement Director KARA K. MILLER Assistant Deputy Enforcement Director

/s/ Hai Binh T. Nguyen_____________ Hai Binh T. Nguyen (CA Bar #313503) Patricia H. Hensler (FL Bar #102303) Enforcement Attorneys 1700 G St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20552

Telephone (Nguyen): 202-435-7251

Telephone (Hensler): 202-435-7829

Email: [email protected]

Email: [email protected] Case 1:20-cv-12147 Document 1 Filed 12/01/20 Page 14 of 14

Order ()

PDF of this document (29 pages)

Page 16

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 1 of 29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,

Plaintiff,

V.

DMB Financial, LLC, Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-12147

ae ‘ STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) commenced

this civil action on December 1, 2020 to obtain injunctive and monetary

relief and civil penalties, from DMB Financial, LLC. The Complaint alleges

violations of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), 16 C.F.R. pt. 310 and the

Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531,

5536(a), in connection with Defendant’s marketing and sale of Debt-Relief

Services.

The Bureau and Defendant agree to entry of this Stipulated Final

Judgment and Order (Order), without adjudication of any issue of fact or

law, to settle and resolve all matters in dispute arising from the conduct

alleged in the Complaint.

Page 17

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 29

FINDINGS

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

2. Defendant neither admits nor denies the allegations in the Complaint, except as specified in this Order. For purposes of this Order, Defendant admits the facts necessary to establish the Court’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of this action.

3. Defendant waives all rights to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Order and any claim it may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action to the date of this Order. Each Party agrees to bear its own costs and expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees.

4. Entry of this Order is in the public interest.

DEFINITIONS 5. The following definitions apply to this Order: a. “Affected Consumers” includes any person who paid Defendant a fee under the Specified Fee-Charging Practices

during the Relevant Period.

Page 18

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 3 of 29

b. “Assist Others” includes, but is not limited to:

il.

iii.

iv.

consulting in any form whatsoever;

formulating or providing, or arranging for the formulation or provision of, any advertising or marketing material, including but not limited to, any telephone sales script, direct mail solicitation, or the text of any Internet website, email, or other electronic communication or advertisement;

formulating or providing, or arranging for the formulation or provision of, any marketing support material or service, including but not limited to, web or Internet Protocol addresses or domain name registration for any Internet websites, affiliate marketing services, or media placement services; providing names of, or assisting in the generation of, potential customers;

performing marketing, billing, or payment services of any kind; and

acting or serving as an owner, officer, director,

manager, or principal of any entity.

Page 19

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 4 of 29

c. “Clearly and Conspicuously” means that a required

disclosure is difficult to miss (i.e., easily noticeable) and

easily understandable by ordinary consumers, including in

the following ways:

i.

il.

ill.

In any communication that is solely visual or solely audible, the disclosure must be made through the same means through which the communication is presented. In any communication made through both visual and audible means, such as a television advertisement, the disclosure must be presented simultaneously in both the visual and audible portions of the communication even if the representation requiring the disclosure is made in only one means.

A visual disclosure, by its size, contrast, location, the length of time it appears, and other characteristics, must stand out from any accompanying text or other . visual elements so that it is easily noticed, read, and understood.

An audible disclosure, including by telephone or

streaming video, must be delivered in a volume, speed,

Page 20

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 5 of 29

iv.

Vii.

Viii.

and cadence sufficient for ordinary consumers to easily hear and understand it.

In any communication using an interactive electronic medium, such as the Internet or software, the disclosure must be unavoidable.

The disclosure must use diction and syntax understandable to ordinary consumers and must appear in each language in which the representation that requires the disclosure appears.

The disclosure must comply with these requirements in each medium through which it is received, including all electronic devices and face-to-face communications. The disclosure must not be contradicted or mitigated by, or inconsistent with, anything else in the communication.

When the representation or sales practice targets a specific audience, such as children, the elderly, or the terminally ill, “ordinary consumers” includes

reasonable members of that group.

Page 21

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 6 of 29

d. “Consumer Financial Product or Service” is

synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the definition

of the term, as of the Effective Date, in § 1002(5) of the

CFPA, 12 U.S.C. § 5481(5), and subject to applicable

restrictions contained in the CFPA, includes, but is not

limited to:

i.

ii.

iii.

extending credit and servicing loans, including acquiring, purchasing, selling, brokering, or other extensions of credit (other than solely extending commercial credit to a person who originates consumer credit transactions);

providing financial-advisory services to consumers on individual financial matters or relating to proprietary financial products or services, including providing credit counseling to any consumer or providing services to assist a consumer with debt management or debt settlement, modifying the terms of any extension of credit, or avoiding foreclosure;

collecting, analyzing, maintaining, or providing

consumer report information or other account

Page 22

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 7 of 29

information, including information relating to the credit history of consumers, used or expected to be used in connection with any decision regarding the offering or provision of a Consumer Financial Product or Service; or

iv. collecting debt related to any Consumer Financial Product or Service.

e. “Creditor” means the original or current creditor as well as such original or current creditor’s agent or attorney, including any collection agent, collection attorney, or thirdparty collector, as well as any other entity holding a consumer’s Enrolled Debt, such as a debt buyer, and that entity’s agent, attorney, collection agent, collection attorney, or third-party collector.

f. “Debt-Relief Service” means any program or service represented, directly or by implication, to renegotiate, settle, or in any way alter the terms of payment or other terms of the debt or obligation, including, but not limited to a reduction in the balance, interest rate, or fees owed by a

consumer to an unsecured creditor or debt collector.

Page 23

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 8 of 29

g. “Debt Settlement and Negotiation Services Agreement” means Defendant’s contract with a consumer for the provision of Debt-Relief Services.

h. “Defendant” means DMB Financial, LLC and its successors and assigns.

i. “Effective Date” means the date on which the Order is entered on the docket.

j. “Enforcement Director” means the Assistant Director of the Office of Enforcement for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, or his or her delegate.

k. “Enrolled Debt” means a consumer debt that Defendant agreed to negotiate for a fee under a Debt Settlement and Negotiation Services Agreement and that the consumer has not withdrawn from the Defendant’s services.

l. “Insurance Agreement” means the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release between Defendant and Maxum Casualty Insurance Company dated on or about May 17, 2021.

m. “Refund” means a payment in the form of a cash refund for

a fee paid under the Specified Fee-Charging Practices.

Page 24

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 9 of 29

n. “Related Consumer Action” means a private action by or on behalf of one or more consumers or an enforcement action by another governmental agency brought against Defendant based on substantially the same facts as described in the Complaint.

o. “Relevant Period” includes the period from January 1, 2015, to the Effective Date.

p. “Specified Fee-Charging Practices” refers to the following conduct during the Relevant Period:

i. requesting or receiving fees from consumers in the absence of a settlement with the Creditor;

ii. requesting or receiving advance fees before consumers made a first payment to a Creditor under a settlement agreement; and

iii. requesting or receiving fees calculated using any debt amount other than the debt amount at the time of enrollment.

q. “Telemarketing” means a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to induce the purchase of goods or

services or a charitable contribution, by use of one or more

Page 25

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti6 Filed 05/19/21 Page 10 of 29

telephones and which involves more than one interstate phone call.

CONDUCT PROVISIONS I Prohibition on Charging Unlawful Settlement Fees IT IS ORDERED that:

6. Defendant and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys who have actual notice of this Order, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them who have actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with the marketing and sale of Debt-Relief Services, may not request or receive a fee, or Assist Others in requesting or receiving a fee, that violates the TSR’s prohibition on abusive acts or practices in Telemarketing, including by:

a. requesting or receiving advance fees under 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)()(B);

b. requesting or receiving fees that are calculated based on the debt amount after the time of enrollment under 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)()(C); and

c. requesting or receiving fees in the absence of a settlement

with the Creditor under 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(5)(i).

Page 26

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 11 of 29

II Prohibition on Deceptive Practices IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

7. Defendant and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them who have actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with sale or offering of Debt-Relief Services or Telemarketing any Consumer Financial Product or Service, may not misrepresent, or Assist Others in misrepresenting, expressly or impliedly:

a. the circumstances in which Defendant may request or receive fees from consumers;

b. how Defendant determines fees requested or received from a consumer;

c. the identity and nature of Defendant and its affiliates’ business; and

d. any other fact material to consumers such as: the total costs, benefits to consumers including savings, financial consequences, effects on consumers’ credit, and any

restrictions, limitations, or conditions.

Page 27

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 12 of 29

III Prohibition on Obtaining Consumers’ Credit Reports IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

8. Defendant and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them who have actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with sale or offering of Debt-Relief Services or Telemarketing any Consumer Financial Product or Service, may not use or obtain a consumer’s credit report unless the credit report is obtained for a purpose for which it is authorized to be furnished under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

IV Required Disclosures in Enrollment Agreements IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

9. Defendant and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other person in active concert or participation with them who have actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly,

must, before Enrollment, Clearly and Conspicuously disclose to consumers:

Page 28

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 13 of 29

a. the time by which Defendant will make a bona fide settlement offer to each Creditor or debt collector under 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(A); and

b. the amount of money or the percentage of each outstanding debt that the customer must accumulate before Defendant will make a bona fide settlement offer to each Creditor or debt collector under 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(1)(viii)(B).

V Cooperation with the Bureau IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

10. Defendant must cooperate fully to help the Bureau determine the identity and location of, and the amount of injury sustained by, each Affected Consumer. Defendant must provide such information in its or its agents’ possession or control within 14 days of receiving a written request from the Bureau.

VI Customer Information IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

11. Defendant, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and

attorneys and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of

Page 29

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 14 of 29

them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, may not:

a. disclose, use, or benefit from customer information, including names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, other identifying information, or any data that enables access to a customer's account (including a credit card, bank account, or other financial account), that Defendant obtained before the Effective Date in connection with its Debt-Relief Services;

b. attempt to collect, sell, assign, or otherwise transfer any right to collect payment from any consumer who purchased or agreed to purchase Debt-Relief Services from Defendant.

However, customer information may be disclosed if requested by a government agency or required by law, regulation, or court order. MONETARY PROVISIONS VII Order to Pay Redress IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

12. Ajudgment for monetary relief is entered in favor of the Bureau

and against the Defendant in the amount of $7,700,000 for the purpose of

Page 30

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti6 Filed 05/19/21 Page 15 of 29

providing redress to Affected Consumers; however, full payment of this judgment will be suspended upon satisfaction of the obligations in Paragraphs 12 through 17 of this Section and Paragraphs 26 through 30 of Section X and subject to Section VIII of this Order.

13. Defendant must pay to the Bureau, by wire transfer to the Bureau or to the Bureau’s agent, and according to the Bureau’s wiring instructions, $5,400,000 in partial satisfaction of the judgment as ordered in Paragraph 12 of this Section according to the following schedule:

a. $2,250,000 within 40 days of the Effective Date;

b. $2,850,000 within 244 days of the Effective Date; and

c. $300,000 within 365 days of the Effective Date. Notwithstanding Paragraph 14, below, Defendant may use up to $1,000,000 in accordance with the Insurance Agreement to meet its obligation in subpart (a), above. Moreover, Defendant may meet its obligations under this Paragraph by demonstrating to the Bureau, at least 10 days before the scheduled payment date, that it has previously made Refunds to Affected Consumers.

14. With regard to any redress that Defendant pays under this Section, except for up to $1,000,000 of the redress that Defendant must

pay under Paragraph 13(a), as provided above, if Defendant receives,

Page 31

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 16 of 29

directly or indirectly, any reimbursement or indemnification from any source, including but not limited to payment made under any insurance policy, or if Defendant secures a tax deduction or tax credit with regard to any federal, state, or local tax, Defendant must: (a) immediately notify the Enforcement Director in writing, and (b) within ten (10) days of receiving the funds or monetary benefit, Defendant must transfer to the Bureau the full amount of such funds or monetary benefit (Additional Payment) to the Bureau or to the Bureau’s agent according to the Bureau’s wiring instructions. After the Bureau receives the Additional Payment, the amount of the suspended judgment referenced in Paragraph 12 will be reduced by the amount of the Additional Payment and the Additional Payment will be applied toward satisfaction of the monetary judgment entered in Paragraph 12.

15. Any funds received by the Bureau in satisfaction of this judgment will be deposited into a fund or funds administered by the Bureau or to the Bureau’s agent according to applicable statutes and regulations to be used for redress for injured consumers, including, but not limited to, refund of moneys, restitution, damages, or other monetary relief, and for

any attendant expenses for the administration of any such redress.

Page 32

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 17 of 29

16. Ifthe Bureau determines, in its sole discretion, that redress to consumers is wholly or partially impracticable or if funds remain after the administration of redress is completed, the Bureau will deposit any remaining funds in the U.S. Treasury as disgorgement. Defendant will have no right to challenge the Bureau’s choice of remedies under this Section and will have no right to contest the manner of distribution chosen by the Bureau.

17. Payment of redress to any Affected Consumer under this Order may not be conditioned on that Affected Consumer waiving any right.

VIII

Effect of Misrepresentation or Omission Regarding Financial Condition

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

18. The suspension of the monetary judgment entered in Section VII of this Order is expressly premised on the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of Defendant’s financial statements and supporting documents submitted to the Bureau on or about March 11, 2021, and May 17, 2021, which Defendant asserts are truthful, accurate, and complete and include: (a) the Financial Statements of DMB Financial, LLC, including the attachments, signed on January 21, 2021, and submitted to the Bureau on

or about March 11, 2021; and (b) the Insurance Agreement.

Page 33

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 18 of 29

19. Ifupon motion by the Bureau, the Court determines that Defendant has failed to disclose any material asset or that any of its financial statements or oral testimony contain any material misrepresentation or omission, including materially misstating the value of any asset, the Court shall terminate the suspension of the monetary judgment entered in Section VII and without further adjudication, shall reinstate the monetary judgment and the full judgment of $7,700,000 shall be immediately due and payable, less any amounts paid to the Bureau under Section VII of this Order.

20. Ifthe Court terminates the suspension of the monetary judgment under this Section, the Bureau will be entitled to interest on the judgment, computed from the date of entry of this Order, at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961, as amended, on any outstanding amounts not paid.

21. Provided, however, that in all other respects this Order shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court; and, provided further, that proceedings instituted under this provision would be in addition to, and not in lieu of any other civil or criminal remedies as may be provided by law, including any other proceedings that the Bureau may

initiate to enforce this Order.

Page 34

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 19 of 29

IX Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

22. Under § 1055(c) of the CFPA, 12 U.S.C. § 5565(c), by reason of the violations of law alleged in the Complaint and continuing until the Effective Date, and taking into account the factors in 12 U.S.C. § 5565(c)(3), Defendant must pay a civil money penalty of $1 to the Bureau. This nominal penalty is based on Defendant’s limited ability to pay as attested to in its financial statements listed in Section VIII above.

23. Within 10 days of the Effective Date, Defendant must pay the civil money penalty by wire transfer to the Bureau or to the Bureau’s agent in compliance with the Bureau’s wiring instructions.

24. The civil money penalty paid under this Order will be deposited in the Civil Penalty Fund of the Bureau as required by § 1017(d) of the CFPA, 12 U.S.C. § 5497(d).

25. Defendant must treat the civil money penalty paid under this Order as a penalty paid to the government for all purposes. Regardless of

how the Bureau ultimately uses those funds, Defendant may not:

Page 35

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 20 of 29

a. claim, assert, or apply for a tax deduction, tax credit, or any other tax benefit for any civil money penalty paid under this Order; or

b. seek or accept, directly or indirectly, reimbursement or indemnification from any source, including but not limited to payment made under any insurance policy, with regard to any civil money penalty paid under this Order.

Xx Additional Monetary Provisions IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

26. Inthe event of any default on Defendant’s obligations to make payment under this Order, interest, computed under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, as amended, will accrue on any outstanding amounts not paid from the date of default to the date of payment, and will immediately become due and payable.

27. Defendant relinquishes all dominion, control, and title to the funds paid under this Order to the fullest extent permitted by law and no part of the funds may be returned to Defendant.

28. The facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true and be

given collateral estoppel effect, without further proof, in any proceeding

Page 36

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 21 of 29

based on the entry of the Order, or in any subsequent civil litigation by or on behalf of the Bureau, including in a proceeding to enforce its rights to any payment or monetary judgment under this Order, such as a nondischargeability complaint in any bankruptcy case.

29. The facts alleged in the Complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain an action by the Bureau under § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), and for such purposes this Order will have collateral estoppel effect against Defendant, even in Defendant’s capacity as debtor-in-possession.

30. Under 31 U.S.C. § 7701, Defendant, unless it already has done so, must furnish to the Bureau its taxpayer-identification numbers, which may be used for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent amount arising out of this Order.

31. Within 30 days of the entry of a final judgment, order, or settlement in a Related Consumer Action, Defendant must notify the Enforcement Director of the final judgment, order, or settlement in writing. That notification must indicate the amount of redress, if any, that Defendant paid or is required to pay to consumers and describe the consumers or classes of consumers to whom that redress has been or will be

paid. To preserve the deterrent effect of the civil money penalty in any

Page 37

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 22 of 29

Related Consumer Action, Defendant may not argue that Defendant is entitled to, nor may Defendant benefit by, any offset or reduction of any monetary remedies imposed in the Related Consumer Action because of the civil money penalty paid in this action or because of any payment that the Bureau makes from the Civil Penalty Fund. If the court in any Related Consumer Action offsets or otherwise reduces the amount of compensatory monetary remedies imposed against Defendant based on the civil money penalty paid in this action or based on any payment that the Bureau makes from the Civil Penalty Fund, Defendant must, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting such offset or reduction, notify the Bureau and pay the amount of the offset or reduction to the U.S. Treasury. Such a payment will not be considered an additional civil money penalty and will not change the amount of the civil money penalty imposed in this action. COMPLIANCE PROVISIONS XI Reporting Requirements

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

32. Defendant must notify the Bureau of any development that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including but not

limited to, a dissolution, assignment, sale, merger, or other action that

Page 38

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 23 of 29

would result in the emergence of a successor company; the creation or dissolution of a subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order; the filing of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding by or against Defendant; or a change in Defendant’s name or address. Defendant must provide this notice at least 30 days before the development or as soon as practicable after the learning about the development, whichever is sooner.

33. Within 7 days of the Effective Date, Defendant must:

a. designate at least one telephone number and email, physical, and postal addresses as points of contact that the Bureau may use to communicate with Defendant;

b. identify all businesses for which Defendant is the majority owner, or that Defendant directly or indirectly controls, by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, postal, email, and Internet addresses; and

c. describe the activities of each such business, including the products and services offered, and the means of advertising,

marketing, and sales.

Page 39

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 24 of 29

34. Defendant must report any change in the information required to be submitted under Paragraph 33 at least 30 days before the change or as soon as practicable after learning about the change, whichever is sooner.

35. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, and again one year after the Effective Date, Defendant must submit to the Enforcement Director an accurate written compliance progress report sworn to under penalty of perjury (Compliance Report), which, at a minimum:

a. lists each applicable paragraph and subparagraph of the Order and describes in detail the manner and form in which Defendant has complied with each such paragraph and subparagraph of this Order; and

b. attaches a copy of each Order Acknowledgment obtained under Section XII, unless previously submitted to the Bureau.

XII Order Distribution and Acknowledgment IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

36. Within 7 days of the Effective Date, Defendant must submit to

the Enforcement Director an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order,

sworn under penalty of perjury.

Page 40

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 25 of 29

37. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, Defendant must deliver a copy of this Order to each of its executive officers, as well as to any managers, employees, service providers, or other agents and representatives who have responsibilities related to the subject matter of the Order.

38. For 5years from the Effective Date, Defendant must deliver a copy of this Order to any business entity resulting from any change in structure referred to in Section XI, any future executive officers, as well as to any managers, employees, service providers, or other agents and representatives who will have responsibilities related to the subject matter of the Order before they assume their responsibilities.

39. Defendant must secure a signed and dated statement acknowledging receipt of a copy of this Order, ensuring that any electronic signatures comply with the requirements of the E-Sign Act, 15 U.S.C.

§§ 7001-7006, within 30 days of delivery, from all persons receiving a copy of this Order under this Section.

40. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, Defendant must provide the Bureau with a list of all persons and their titles to whom this Order was

delivered through that date under Paragraphs 37 and 38 and a copy of all

Page 41

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 26 of 29

signed and dated statements acknowledging of receipt of this Order under Paragraph 39.

XIII Recordkeeping

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

41. Defendant must create, for at least 10 years from the Effective Date, all documents and records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this Order, including all submissions to the Bureau. Defendant must retain these documents for at least 10 years after creation and make them available to the Bureau upon the Bureau’s request.

42. Defendant must maintain, for at least 10 years from the Effective Date or 10 years after creation, whichever is longer:

a. copies of all sales scripts; training materials; advertisements; websites; and other marketing materials, including any such materials used by a third party on Defendant’s behalf;

b. for each individual Affected Consumer: the consumer’s name, address, phone number, email address; amount paid, description of the Debt-Relief Service purchased, the date on which the Debt-Relief Service was purchased, a copy of the

consumer’s Debt Settlement and Negotiation Services

Page 42

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 27 of 29

Agreement, a copy of any promotional or welcome materials provided, and, if applicable, the date and reason the consumer left the program;

c. accounting records showing the gross and net revenues generated by the Debt-Relief Services;

d. all consumer complaints and refund requests (whether received directly or indirectly, such as through a third party), and any responses to those complaints or requests;

e. records showing, for each employee providing Debt-Relief Services, that person’s: name; telephone number; email, physical, and postal address; job title or position; dates of service; and, if applicable, the reason for termination; and

f. records showing, for each service provider providing services related to Debt-Relief Services, the name of a point of contact, and that person’s telephone number; email, physical, and postal address; job title or position; dates of service; and, if applicable, the reason for termination.

Defendant must make these materials available to the Bureau upon

the Bureau’s request.

Page 43

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Documenti16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 28 of 29

XIV Notices IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

43. Unless otherwise directed in writing by the Bureau, Defendant must provide all submissions, requests, communications, or other documents relating to this Order in writing, with the subject line, “BCFP v. DMB Financial, LLC, Case No.1:20-cv-12147-RGS,” and send them by overnight courier or first-class mail to the below address and contemporaneously by email to [email protected]:

Assistant Director for Enforcement

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

ATTENTION: Office of Enforcement

1700 G Street, N.W.

Washington D.C. 20552

XV Compliance Monitoring IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

44. Within 14 days of receipt of a written request from the Bureau,

Defendant must submit additional compliance reports or other requested

information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; provide sworn

testimony; or produce documents.

Page 44

Case 1:20-cv-12147-RGS Document 16 Filed 05/19/21 Page 29 of 29

45. Defendant must permit Bureau representatives to interview any employee or other person affiliated with Defendant who has agreed to such an interview regarding (a) this matter; (b) anything related to or associated with the conduct described the Complaint; or (c) compliance with this Order. The person interviewed may have counsel present.

46. Nothing in this Order will limit the Bureau’s lawful use of compulsory process, under 12 C.F.R. § 1080.6.

XVI Retention of Jurisdiction IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

47. The Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose

of enforcing this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this [qt day of May, 2021.

Hon. Richard G. Stearns United States District Judge