Advisory opinion letter to Mr. Scheftel
Opening text: Attorney First Staff Response November 8, 1977
92 F.T.C. 1023 · Nov. 8, 1977 ·
source volume section (92 F.T.C. 1023)
Text is machine-OCR of the printed volume and may contain errors. Advisory opinions are the Commission's views on proposed conduct, not binding orders.
Attorney
First Staff Response
November 8, 1977
Dear Mr. Scheftel:
We owe you an apology for the delay which has occurred in handling your request for an advisory opinion for the telephone cigarette advertising your company is contemplating. Although a draft response to your inquiry was prepared by me and reviewed by our General Counsel’s office back in July, the matter apparently became misplaced before the office of the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection reviewed it. We apologize for this. I can assure you that this matter is now receiving the proper attention, and although I cannot promise an advisory opinion by any specific date, I am confident that the delays which occurred in the
past will not recur.
Sincerely,
/s/ Russell Hatchl
Russell Hatch]